Search results

Actually there are "good" today that attack bacteria. But how do you rationalize that preFall when no death was supposed to be the standard. Neither viruses or bacteria would have much to do.

Then what would they have done? Just used others cells to reproduce but not injure the host? How would that work?

Should they have a different name? By definition, pathogens cause disease.

What is so special about the architecture of Sacsayhuaman. Are you suggesting somehow it is architecturally or technologically more advanced than buildings today?

So blood born pathogens were present preFall?

Mosquitos were designed after the Fall to do this? Why? If not, what was their purpose pre Fall?

nope, you don’t debate.

In addition to life evolving the chance of life arising from chemistry and physics is also 100%—-here we are

You are using a computer program to assemble a particular RNA molecule by random chance. Ignoring any of the physics and chemistry that put such a molecule together. The analogy to an expensive watch coming together by virtue of chance and gravity is not applicable. In addition, I suspect from...

RNA does not need 26 letters.

What information are you encoding, I dont see why you need 102 nucleotides You are using RNA to make protein, right? so ignoring any start/stop messages 102 nucleotides makes a protein with 34 amino acids. Why that limit? I suspect most proteins are much larger and yes, a different amino acid...

why is there only one combination that works? Why do you need 102 nucleotides?

Ahhh, evidence for that knowledge? You must have some, right?

I'm not on X "formerly known as Twitter", can you provide a citation to the scientific literature. for this claim, thanks

Less travel time to visit his friend Vlady?

That is a quote from Stephen Jay Gould. If you rely on that to suggest Gould did not accept evolution you have not read much of his work. Quote mine much?

Good, how and with whom did you check facts re sea level rise

How do you decide if they are correct??

No, I don't know the name of the logical fallacy, please explain it to me. thanks ever so much