Search results

Look, if you accuse someone of something then the onus isn't on the person to prove their innocence but rather on you to establish their guilt. Anyone can cry fraud as Trump did. It's another thing altogether to substantiate it and his own team had ample opportunity to bring such to court if...

The situation in Arizona is a farce. Even plenty Republicans aren't in favour of what's going on.

If there was any evidence of fraud then sure, it should be investigated. As it stands, there isn't any evidence and just a lot of sour grapes from the former president on down because he lost.

The onus is on those who are shouting fraud to have something substantial to back up those claims. Otherwise, all said allegations have come to nothing besides law suits directed at those who've pushed false claims.

Well, I don't kowtow to any sort of group mentality without question but then proper research involves scrutinising sources that don't fit into a confirmation bias.

Nope.

Prove it. Otherwise this is just yet more bluster.

There's been ample opportunity for Trump's lawyers to present any such evidence in court and they backed off from crossing that threshold.

Well, no, that's simply not the case. The majority of Americans voted for Biden and you're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.

The onus isn't on me to prove such, that would be the remit of those who levelled the accusation of fraud to start with and summarily failed to substantiate it.

Anyone with a sensible mind wouldn't be prone to such subjective hyperbole. As I've already stated, I've no issue with investigations or any such fraud being uncovered had there been any. You can convince yourself that Trump was swindled out of winning or some such as you may, it doesn't make it...

I do no such thing. Where on earth have I claimed anything remotely resembling? I've pointed out to you that the allegations of fraud have been baseless which isn't the same thing at all.

Hardly.

Where on earth did you get this from?

Investigate away, I've no problem with any actual fraud being uncovered and brought to light, none at all regardless of who won. As it stands, Trump lost because the majority of the American people wanted him out of office, just like how the majority wanted him in back in 2016.

They backed away because they didn't want to be hit with lawsuits and they had no evidence to support the bunk that Powell and Giuliani were promoting.

Fine. At the same time, there's no reason to take baseless allegations of fraud seriously if there's nothing of substance to support such claims. As is the case here.

Covering up for fraud of any sort would amount to such. As I've stated before, if there was any tangible evidence of such fraud then as much as I'm no fan of Trump, it should be brought to light and those responsible for perverting the results be brought to justice and held accountable. That...

If that's the 'strength' of your argument then you have no idea whether someone has won any election or not regardless of party or candidate. Otherwise, I certainly do have an 'idea' as to who won the last election and it assuredly wasn't Trump. Powell and Giuliani can be dismissed easily enough...

Yep, that still won't stop some from buying into fraud conspiracy rubbish unfortunately...