Search results

Well, that's his credibility - if he ever had any - out the window then.

Pffft, nah doofus, it's cos I disagree with you and any other far right fundamentalist dipstick. Thankfully, most Christians aren't pompous stuffed shirts and legalists and the irony is that you resemble those of the time who were puffed up, considering themselves experts in the law and that...

This the same guy who tried to defend Alex Jones over the Sandy Hook Massacre?

Most of the Ukrainian people don't hate Russia. They'd have far preferred they weren't victims of this horrific and barbaric invasion to start with.

Well, that rules Putin and his regime out then doesn't it? No matter what "spiritual" ties he claims to have with the Russian orthodox church or Christianity. Since when is it moral to invade a country and bombard its populace with continual shelling and else?

Aw, you took the rhyme out of it. That was its major selling point...

All sorts whether through enacting or through ideology.

Er, how you gleaned that from what I wrote is anyone's guess, but more probably just yours...

Given the amount of far right wingnut sites that are prevalent and that you seem partial to then eminently possible. Otherwise there's all sorts of satirical shows that don't expect their audiences to give every given thing aired as news verbatim...

I know you weren't. I was putting things in perspective. This "patriot" stuff is just divisive rubbish.

Haven't heard that dumb one in a while!

Uh, if it's satire then it wasn't meant to be taken seriously anyway was it?

You said "good enough for everyone" so what were you on about exactly? Again with the arrogance. My conscience has to be seared because I don't happen to agree with you? Not how it works. If my being for civil liberties and freedoms without religious persecution is searing it exactly then can't...

You seriously think that Trump has a shot of becoming president again, even after his atrocious remarks regarding the invasion of the Ukraine? Some "war". Most people just try to get on with their lives as they can and want to be thankful they can do that without their streets being shelled.

What, everyone? Even Vladimir Putin? Oh, I'm sure there'll be loads who'd be disappointed then, shame that. Why is it a false dilemma? Did you need the Bible to be moved by the plight of others? Are you even? I would remind you of the woman in adultery but as it's likely to be a load of waffle...

Shame that...

"The rest of us"? Shame, thought you might have been ready to have a proper conversation but apparently not. Still, as it is.. I didn't need the Bible to give me a conscience, to be moved by the suffering of others, to be appalled at cruelty or the notion of inflicting it etc. Still, if that was...

Oh, I actually need a source to have a functioning moral compass? Let me guess, anything other then the Bible is a complete no-no right? Well, as it happens the Bible informs a lot of it.

But apparently worth the time it took you to respond to it. Hardly. I'm not the one arrogantly accusing others of having no moral standards.

You're not delivering a message that warrants a peashooter dude. Heard it all before. The self impressed, pompous arrogance is once again, nothing new.