Search results

Wish granted!

If the odds of practically ANY biological system you care to name forming by mindless, undirected natural processes were only 1 in 300,000,000 you'd have a point, but the odds aren't even close to being that good! Not even remotely close! In fact, there are no odds. It is not unlikely, it is...

You have to actually read my posts, fool. Both arguments presented with full to the brim with scripture. It isn't my fault that you're too lazy to bother reading them. Here, I'll post them again just so as to remove any excuse you might want to employ about not being able to find them... Proof...

I wasn't wrong. At most we were talking past one another and all you're doing now is asking me to REPEAT myself! It seems all you're interested in is wasting my time. And I will post in any thread I desire to post in whether you like what I have to say or not.

None of this refutes a single syllable of what I've now repeatedly argued. Clete

No, I wont.

Then why don't you make actual arguments instead of simply stating your doctrine? If it isn't true then prove it! All you have to do is answer the question in a manner that is consistent with your doctrine! Forgot the question? Here it is again... Do you suppose God would have broken had...

I'm the only one here who has presented a thorough biblical argument - two of them in fact! You've presented a single proof text that doesn't say a syllable about time being created! You want to say that time is included in "ALL things", including things that don't actually exist and so I just...

Nope. I'm the one here defending what I believe with actual argumentation. You've got nothing but your a priori doctrine and the pretense that simply saying something makes it true. Liar! I responded directly to the mindless quote a scripture that said precisely nothing about the creation of...

Why do you want me to repeat myself?

I am the originator of "Saying it doesn't make it so." - at least on TOL, anyway. It has been a staple in my posts for decades and it will continue to be so. Anyone else here who says it, is copying me (i.e. following my example).

Did you really miss the point of the comment? Anyone can believe anything! I don't care what you believe, I care about what you can establish with scripture and plain reason. It's only a "stupid question" because there's no way for you to answer it that is consistent with your doctrine! The...

You're a liar! Good bye!

Why do you do this? Stop wasting my time!

Liar. There is no such scripture. If you had anything close to that, you'd have already posted it. I just posted two separate things that actually do PROVE that God is not timeless and, more importantly, I don't have to prove a negative. The fact is that the whole creation event is recorded in...

Why should I care about what you believe? That's stupidity. Of course He knew what He was doing. That's why He had a plan in place to deal with it if Adam chose to disobey. Do you suppose God would have broken had Adam decided to obey God's command and refused to eat of the Tree of the...

Yes, of course I do. I've never denied the existence of figures of speech. What I've denied is that it took more than 144 hours for God to create the Heavens, the Earth and everything in them (Exodus 20:11 & Exodus 31:17). Clete

Saying it doesn't make it so, glorydaz! Neither does ignoring counter arguments and repeating your position as though it hasn't been refuted! First of all, I've never said that man is spiritually dead from birth, which is what the Calvinists teach. And I've also never said that being...

It doesn't matter whether you reject them or not. That isn't the point. Those things are RATIONAL CONSEQUENCES. In other words, those things follow logically from the premise that a day isn't a day. You can reject them if you like but then you'll have to stop claiming to have anything that...

Because I can think clearly. You cannot control something that does not exist except as a concept. Time is an idea, not an ontological thing that can be manipulated. Of course I do! It is you who have exactly nothing to support the notion of a "timeless eternity". That idea is nowhere in...