Search results

@User Name In one of your posts over the last few years, I remember you had posted this bizarre image, or one pretty close to it: I haven't found that post, and I can't really remember what you had said in it. But I recollected that image today as I was watching a video in which a guy was...

@Dingleberry still disagrees with you: You, two jokers are glaringly contradicting each other. It's pathetic that you imagine you'll somehow be able to whitewash your failure...especially by writing more and more ridiculous stupidity to pile on top of it.🤣🤣🤣

Whom do you mean by "gentiles"? Most people mean people who are not Jews. So, by this bizarre phrase of yours, do you mean: "Israeli [people who are not Jews]"? So, since Jews are not gentiles, Jews are not men?

Is a creature not an individual? What would a creature be if not an individual? I don't know that I have ever been given a definition by a Darwinist, of anything. Many times Darwinists have handed me some gobbledygook and erroneously called their gobbledygook, "definition". But what is not...

But every butterfly is an individual, and it is the same individual emerging out of its chrysalis that it already was at the moment it had first hatched out of its egg; it's not now another individual than the individual that it was all along.

LOL @ the pathetic spectacle of people like @User Name, @annabenedetti, and @Arthur Brain--proud lovers of the murder of unborn babies--speaking in terms of posterity!

No creature has ever changed into another creature. Your dog, Rosie, gave birth to a puppy, Rover. Rosie's one creature, and Rover's another creature. Rosie did not change into Rover. Rosie did not become Rover. So, as long as Darwinists, by their "evolved into" lingo mean gave birth to...

@Arthur Brain, could you please provide a link to where (if anywhere) your fellow leftard, @User Name, has answered the question I asked him: It doesn't appear that he has answered it. Even though I gave him a reminder of it several hours after I had first asked him it. Why is that? Or, did...

Well, @User Name? Can you not tell us?

That is gold!

At approximately what angle?

With all due respect, I think what you're missing is that, in order for an acausal continuum to first need to relate to an infinite array of manifestations, we would have to have a regession where there resists (not exists, as you so eruditely yet mistakenly suppose) nothing between continuum...

Hey Einstein, what's your avatar? Is that a character from Despicable Me?

Of every person whom you would call a "Trump supporter," exactly what is it that he or she does that you are calling "supporting Trump"? What is the sine qua non of whatever you call "supporting Trump"?

Their game is to not address, and to try to shift attention away from their failure to address criticism of the irrational ways in which they are using their words. And, lo and behold! What's one way they love to try to silence said inconvenient criticism? Why, they love to reflexively throw...

In other words, @User Name refuses to answer the question I asked him.

So, which is it? When Trump says he is "one of the great men of America," does he believe what he is saying, or instead, is he lying?

Apparently so. At least, he must be at least some of the time.

One of @User Name's people spoke at a Trump rally recently: