Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Lon's latest activity
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
Nice! Unsettler, note form on this one for 'how to respond to "classic" theism from Clete's attempt here. Realize for most anybody...
Nov 9, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
Or buying any particular translation. That knife is double-edged. Be careful shaving.
Nov 9, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did
.
The 'so' is how we address any particular person, such as if I called you a (see above). Perhaps it is preference and protocol on...
Nov 9, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did
.
Thanks, it has been awhile and I missed context. Appreciate the reminder, help. My last paragraph is most pertinent. The rest of...
Nov 9, 2025
Lon
reacted to
Derf's post
in the thread
Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did
with
Like
.
Here:
Nov 9, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
I'd suggest 'attacking the messenger' the least effective way to 'respond to "classical" theism.' I may be wrong, like I said, not my...
Nov 8, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did
.
??? Not sure what this is in reference to for me specifically. I believe Hebrews is written to Hebrew Christians, not gentiles...
Nov 8, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
AI, have no link persay, just typed in "Root meaning of Nacham" Do you realize you are saying 'context' tells you how to translate one...
Oct 24, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
Or you, to yourself? --> https://vojisrael.org/hebrew-word-of-the-week-nacham-the-comfort-of-god/ "The comfort of God." 🌿 Root...
Oct 24, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
Conveyance, especially accuracy. Any one of us can (an do) come up with language to describe something. Often, you have called me...
Oct 20, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
Just over 9k 🆙 Really at the heart of what I'm saying: translation pushes meaning further than Hebrew intent. I believe it best...
Oct 20, 2025
Lon
reacted to
JudgeRightly's post
in the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
with
Like
.
One more thing to point out: English is a very broad language, with over 170k words. Hebrew, by comparison, has only a fraction of...
Oct 20, 2025
Lon
reacted to
Clete's post
in the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
with
Like
.
That's right and words are the symbols we use to name concepts. It's more complicated than just that though because the concept a word...
Oct 19, 2025
Lon
replied to the thread
How to respond to classical theists who dodge Open Theism arguments
.
But plugging in a modern colloquialism isn't best either. We'd instead follow: Nacham means to sigh. When we think of...
Oct 19, 2025
Lon
reacted to
Clete's post
in the thread
Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did
with
Like
.
Paul's existence as an Apostles doesn't even make sense from anything other than a Mid-Acts Dispensational perspective. Jesus already...
Oct 18, 2025
Forums
Members
Top