Derf's latest activity

Alright, your AI experiment is a perfect opportunity that should allow us to land this plane. I think at this point it should be pretty...

So you're a mind-reader now. You know just what Paul would have done.... come on! You get so worked up that you start using fallacious...

No it isn't! Everyone knew what baptism was and knew it involved water. If Paul had meant something else, he would have said so. No...

LOL--"Password is too strong"

No sir! I am purely and only and explicitly QUOTING the verse! It says what it says! You have to interpret it to say something that...

That's your doctrine talking. Do you remember when I said something about how it seems like almost all of the arguments supporting...

I am quoting scripture. Do you deny that Paul baptized people as late as Acts 18 and 19? That is your doctrinal position. You don't get...

Repeating your position does not count as a response to the argument. If "Any other baptism is a distraction that diverts attention...

There were negative effects in Corinth about communion, but that wasn't a reason to ignore Christ's teaching about it. So Paul didn't...

And where are these instructions not to water baptize? They don't exist. If they did, there would be no argument.

How much later can it be than Acts 19? Just how much past the period of time covered by Acts are you thinking these latest instructions...

Well, of course it makes perfect sense. That's the reason it was the very first thing Paul did once having been filled with the Spirit...