Clete's latest activity

Judges under the proposed Constitution are not sitting in hierarchical seats of power where only some higher authority can prosecute...

It 100% does answer it and it does so without any possible refutation. The difference between judges ignoring the law and a king who...

"So, let's throw out checks and balances!" is your solution? You are literally making the Shakespearean argument, "Kill all the...

There is no need to spend three hours responding to each point.

Our disagreement comes down to what it means to have rule of law. The rule of law exists when rulers and subjects alike are governed by...

Okay JudgeRightly, let's look at this a slightly different way... Let's say that a king publicly renounces the Constitution and...

I just cannot understand how you can find so much to say on a point we've belabored for months. I am addressing the point specifically...

I'm not sure you've posted enough of the author's argument to fully evaluate his position. My difficulty with treating information as a...

I do not make bald assertions! First of all, we've been discussing this for months - years! Secondly, and far more importantly, I...

The fact that the provision in the law is permanently there is COMPLETELY NOT RELEVANT!!!! Every provision in the law is permanent...

I keep trying to boil this down to what I think is our core disagreement. Under the proposed system as written, there is no earthly...

Answered in posts #210, #211, #216, #230, and #235. Calling your view “precedent” and calling Open Theism “heterodox” does not prove...

Okay, so I fed as much as I could of Bob's material into, and had some lengthy discussion with, ChatGPT on the subject of a Code of Use...

The point is that this is not an argument! Precedent can be wrong - and often is! Not in the classical sense of the term. It isn't...