Clete's latest activity

I haven't the time to respond to each point so I'll have to keep this generalized.... The point it seems you are missing is that...

This is in part why non-believers change translations. It is a perversion to suit their agenda. The same with Genesis 3. When shown what...

Yes it does prove it. It proves it for the same reason that Enyart's "Evolve" computer program back in the 90s proves the theory of...

Unresponsive, unsupported claims do not an argument make. (i.e. Saying it doesn't make it so.) They haven't done so because it cannot...

Repeat yourself all you like. Your implication that such details are relevant doesn't make it so. At the end of the day, we are talking...

Think of it this way. Imagine a much easier scenario. Let's pretend someone was trying to create a stable system that rested inside one...

I do not need to know anything more about what it does or how it behaves beyond the fact that it is an uncontrolled explosion...

There are really really excellent reasons why this line of thought has been understood to be a fallacy for longer than anyone has...

We are repeating ourselves. Those six bodies wouldn't have been the only six pieces of debris sent there in such an explosion -...

It is not merely a mathematics problem. The mathematical difficulty reflects something true about reality itself, namely that extremely...

No. I am simply applying a single definition of knowledge to both cases. Knowledge means knowledge. Foreknowledge means prior...

That is a LOT easier to say than it is to do.

It would have lit up the sky like a Christmas tree. The biggest meteor showers recorded in history would have paled in comparison...

That depends on relative velocity. If two large bodies collide from unrelated trajectories at high relative speed, then yes, they tend...