Apart from the fact that I answered you several times. Never once have I stated that a criminal should get away with a crime as you accused me of. Care to retract? Ironically enough, Clete did answer you on the score where it comes to five year olds, something I did at the time this particular...
You'll find out if you read it. I provided the evidence so read it or don't. I know it's in depth and a long read so up to you.
It's not just you where it comes to social media, I'm a bit more savvy than to buy into preconceived talking heads to confirm bias is all.
I know it wasn't. That's why I've stated - even just in my above that we shouldn't allow a PERSON - NOT A CRIMINAL - to get away with a crime, provided that they're old enough to be held accountable for one. Geez...
If you cared enough you'd read it, it's all addressed, in detail and corroborated.
You don't get to critique anybody else's intelligence when you're posting off 'YT, 'X' 'TikTok' etc and expect anything from talking heads to pass muster.
Gordon Bennet, maybe I should post pics cos you sure don't seem to understand words too well. I'll see if all caps helps any. MY ANSWER HAS BEEN THERE FOR THE LAST DOZEN OR SO POSTS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW A PERSON TO GET AWAY WITH A CRIME - PROVIDED THEY'RE OLD ENOUGH TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR A...
No, I haven't. A five year old child is a person, yes, but they're not a criminal or held as accountable for their actions as an adult under law. You wanna keep beating this asinine drum of yours then go ahead.