Twitter is planning to start charging $20 per month for verification
It looks like Elon isn't even going to need that many advertisers.
Last edited:
MUSK BUYS TWITTER!
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Let's talk about just how wonderful this article is:
In other words: "It's my way or the highway, snowflakes."
This means the blue checkmark libs are going to be paying money to make sure that formerly banned conservatives (which banning they cheered) will have their influence back. It just keeps getting better and better.
Read that sentence again. Just for fun. Let it sink in.
"...right now." Christmas come early.
And many of those same managers will likely be fired themselves when they finish the task. Brutal. Just brutal. This is what political censors deserve.
Give the snowflakes a taste of what actual work feels like (for the first time in their lives) and then fire them. Ya gotta love him.
Go ahead and boycott Twitter from receiving a lot of ad revenue all you "woke" corporations. With the increase in revenue from the blue checkmark liberals along with the massive cuts in bloated salaries, it won't hurt Twitter's bottom line.
Christmas come early!
In other words: "It's my way or the highway, snowflakes."
This means the blue checkmark libs are going to be paying money to make sure that formerly banned conservatives (which banning they cheered) will have their influence back. It just keeps getting better and better.
Read that sentence again. Just for fun. Let it sink in.
"...right now." Christmas come early.
And many of those same managers will likely be fired themselves when they finish the task. Brutal. Just brutal. This is what political censors deserve.
Give the snowflakes a taste of what actual work feels like (for the first time in their lives) and then fire them. Ya gotta love him.
Go ahead and boycott Twitter from receiving a lot of ad revenue all you "woke" corporations. With the increase in revenue from the blue checkmark liberals along with the massive cuts in bloated salaries, it won't hurt Twitter's bottom line.
Christmas come early!
Sure, no problem:
Hollywood Elites Panic, Vow to Quit Twitter over Elon Musk Takeover: ‘I’m Out of Here’
Last edited:
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
But when someone chooses to criticize your self-righteous hypocrisy and your use of the "ignore" function, whose business is it but that critic's?
Right Divider
Body part
Not all bias is bad. Bias in the open is hardly something to fear.
Truth and error create a tilted playing field. You're just mad because you're in error.
No, I'm not the "chosen one".
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
GET A GRIP: Reuters Editor Freaks World ‘Worse Off’ with Musk Twitter Ownership
An editor for one of the most powerful liberal media outlets in the world is having a breakdown over the world’s richest man completing his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You seem to spend a lot of your time on TOL calling non-banned TOL members who say things you don't like to hear, "wingnuts," "bat crazy," etc. Yet, here you've basically just told us that to not be banned from TOL is to have not "gone off the deep end". IOW, according to your silliness, a person can be a "bat crazy" "wingnut" without having "gone off the deep end":
"Joe is a bat crazy wingnut, but at least he's not gone off the deep end!"
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
This judgemental, leftard clown wasted one bale of hey and six heads of let's to make his word salad:
I guess too much roughage could explain the flatulence that is his Twitter output.
I guess too much roughage could explain the flatulence that is his Twitter output.
Hollywood Elites? I could not care less.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Why?
But how many of those 31 million were bots?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I was well aware of the bias of this place when I joined back in 2006. It was recommended to me a friend from another forum with the advice of have a thick skin and enjoy.
It's not that at all as was explained to you in my last. You can use all manner of name calling, implied vulgarity etc whereas were I to do the same in turn would land me in the penalty box. You won't be the one getting the ban and frankly, you know this. You know fine well that you have more leeway than those on the 'left' of the aisle who have to tread more carefully and if you somehow don't know this then you should. I'm not mad about it but I'm not going to pretend that this is a level playing field because it isn't. Saying that I'm mad because I'm in error is just kindergarten rubbish. I argue on issues from a perspective that's different to yours is all.
Nobody said you were. See above for clarification.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Hmm, funny, not so long ago you were wondering why I wasn't on TOL that much these days and felt the need to contact me about it. Amusing if nothing else.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Your point?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It was made in my post. Hardly any need to elaborate.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Nice conspiracy theory you're pushing there, you unhinged wingnut. Good luck trying to sell it, seeing as how you use outright vulgarity, and yet you're still here, Princess Snowflake:
Stop being such a whiney hypocrite.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Oh, so the point you made in your post is that you had no point to make. Understood.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What "outright vulgarity" are you accusing me of? Do provide an example as I'm averse to it as well as using it normally. The floor is yours. "Bat crap crazy" hardly counts and you should already know that.
Take your own advice.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, obviously you didn't understand but far from unexpected.