Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Disconnect between theology and behavior?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Lon View Post
    It means to me that God has 'ordained' that men should be able to resist His will, for however long He deems.
    Lon, first you say that the LORD has total control and that He is unwilling that any should perish.

    Then you turn around and say that men are able to resist His will.

    If He is unwilling that any should perish and He is in total control then none would be able to resist his will and none will perish.

    We are to "reason" out of the Scriptures (Acts 17:2) but if we are to believe your ideas we must throw our reason to the wind!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post

      Lon, first you say that the LORD has total control and that He is unwilling that any should perish.

      Then you turn around and say that men are able to resist His will.
      Start a new thread? Even an Open Theist agrees God 'can' stop any man from 'resisting' His will. Sheer force, necessarily means complete sovereignty.
      Listen please: ANY force outside of God would create a duality in the universe where something exists 'beside' and 'outside' of God. If so, then is God just one of many elements in a pre-existing universe? I've thought long and hard about 'implications' and direction of specific theological ideas. I know where they logically lead. Without being condescending, I simply invite others to think long and hard about these same things. Part if this is logic and philosophy class (classes that are supposed to teach us 'how' to think) but I was thinking like this long before I took these classes. Our thoughts and ideas, logically lead somewhere and we have to determine where ideas point as well as well as if scripture upholds them. Again, after this point, could we please start a new thread? It doesn't really carry the intent here and I don't want this thread diminished by conflicting and distracting agendas. My last post was engineered to get this one back on track because the topic is very important to me. It means I really need a new thread on this very different and separate topic or I'm not going to respond in this thread to any more questions in this direction.

      Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
      If He is unwilling that any should perish and He is in total control then none would be able to resist his will and none will perish.

      We are to "reason" out of the Scriptures (Acts 17:2) but if we are to believe your ideas we must throw our reason to the wind!
      "Reason to the wind" when my I.Q. is reasonably high, is a non starter. Try instead to ask 'how' or what I do with what doesn't make sense to you. It has nothing to do with reason being thrown to the wind, but reason carried where all this logically points to and I believe I do it as well, if not better than most. Again, start another thread. This is absolutley not where I want this thread to go and I crafted my last post prior, to get this thread back on track. As graciously and forcefully as I will convey: I will not continue this line of discussion here, and no amount of baiting will get me to do so. I'm done with this side-rail.

      My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
      Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
      Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
      Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
      No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
      Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

      ? Yep

      Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

      ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

      Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Lon View Post
        Listen please: ANY force outside of God would create a duality in the universe where something exists 'beside' and 'outside' of God.
        Lon, please let me ask you a simple question:

        Do you believe in free will?

        Or do you believe that the LORD is responsible for all of our actions, including our sins?


        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post

          Lon, please let me ask you a simple question:

          Do you believe in free will?

          Or do you believe that the LORD is responsible for all of our actions, including our sins?

          Start a new thread, please.
          My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
          Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
          Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
          Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
          No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
          Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

          ? Yep

          Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

          ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

          Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Lon View Post
            Start a new thread, please.
            Why? What could be more germane to the subject of this thread which is:

            Disconnect between theology and behavior?

            Again, Do you believe in free will?

            Or do you believe that the LORD is responsible for all of our actions, including our sins?


            Do you not think that these questions are related to "theology and behavior"?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post

              Why? What could be more germane to the subject of this thread which is:

              Disconnect between theology and behavior?

              Again, Do you believe in free will?

              Or do you believe that the LORD is responsible for all of our actions, including our sins?


              Do you not think that these questions are related to "theology and behavior"?
              More a distraction than reaching the pertinent, Jerry.

              It was 'my' point that freewill theists should be the ones that support this thread the most: the onus of their behavior is on them.

              Me? I'm a 'new' creation created by Christ Jesus FOR good works. My will, such as it may be, is on board or I'd not be a Christian.

              There: In two sentences: both freewill and not much of a will people of God, need to be conformed to His image by the renewing of our minds.


              Thus germane? It is shadow and mirrors for disobedience as well as trying to cover a life that is stagnant or growing VERY slowly otherwise. THAT is what is germane to this thread.

              Discussion of the will simply provides distraction or lame excuse, regardless if you are an Open Theist, Arminian, or Calvinist. As far as I grasp the scriptures, there is no excuse. This thread isn't about the state of salvation, but 1) how much time is EVIDENT from spending daily time in prayer and scriptures with the Savior (we start to look like whom we hang around). and 2) What the Lord Jesus Christ is doing in "HIS" creations. Paul tells us, 'You are not your own! You were paid for at a great price!" That, Jerry, is the end and most important point of this discussion. There is nothing more important or germane that would distract from this biblical, Christ-given, Paul-given truth AND it is so important to ask on TOL. I've been here 20 years. There really should be evidence of the Savior's work, more and more.

              Because we 'belong' to Jesus Christ, 'our' will is not the important discussion. It'd be like talking about 'me' all the time when I'm talking about my marriage. It ignores that the 'two' have become one flesh. Likewise, it isn't appropriate to talk about 'my' freewill as a Christian since I'm united with Christ in His death and, IN HIM, am a new creation. There is a sense at that point that 'freewill,' has been replaced with "Ourwill" and "Hiswill." "It is no longer I, but Christ in me" Paul says in Romans.

              As Open Theism and Mid Acts Theology venture into the world, there is an even GREATER need for lights in connection with the message. Nobody will believe the messages are 'good' news, without 'good' accompanying the message. The message, rather will look like something MUCH less than 'good' and that blame necessarily falls on the messenger.

              Granted Jonah was a very disgruntled messenger, so it is possible that the message can be separated, but God corrected Jonah's bad attitude. A BUNCH of times. He doesn't leave us the way we were.

              My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
              Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
              Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
              Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
              No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
              Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

              ? Yep

              Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

              ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

              Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Lon View Post
                This thread isn't about the state of salvation, but 1) how much time is EVIDENT from spending daily time in prayer and scriptures with the Savior (we start to look like whom we hang around). and 2) What the Lord Jesus Christ is doing in "HIS" creations. Paul tells us, 'You are not your own! You were paid for at a great price!" That, Jerry, is the end and most important point of this discussion.
                Sorry, Lon, but I misunderstood the subject of this thread. Evidently you are speaking of the disconnect between theology and behavior only in regard to those who are already saved. Excuse me.

                On this subject I would say that a Christian's behavior is mostly determined by His "growth" as a Christian and here is what the Scriptures say about that:

                "But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen." (2 Pet.3:18).


                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post

                  Sorry, Lon, but I misunderstood the subject of this thread. Evidently you are speaking of the disconnect between theology and behavior only in regard to those who are already saved. Excuse me.

                  On this subject I would say that a Christian's behavior is mostly determined by His "growth" as a Christian and here is what the Scriptures say about that:

                  "But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen." (2 Pet.3:18).

                  Thank you. Appreciate that, Jerry.
                  My New Years Resolution: 1 Peter 3:15
                  Omniscient without man's qualification. John 1:3 "Nothing"
                  Colossians 1:17 "Nothing" John 15:5 "Nothing"
                  Mighty, ALL mighty (omnipotent). Revelation 1:8
                  No possible limitation Isaiah 40:25 Joshua 24:15
                  Infinite (Omnipresent) Psalm 145:3 Hebrews 4:13

                  ? Yep

                  Now to Him who is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think... Amen. -Ephesians 3:20 & 21

                  ... when I became an adult, I set aside childish ways. Titus 3:10 Ephesians 4:29-32; 5:11

                  Separation of church and State is not atheism "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    If there is anyone who reads this thread and thinks that Lon rejects free will and has at least partially accepted Calvinism because some Open Theist (me) offended him then you're a bigger fool than even Lon.

                    Lon care at all about what the bible says. He doesn't care at all about making an argument or responding to one. He cares about what he LIKES. He liked AMR and so now he starts threads extolling how nice he was. But the only reason Lon liked him is because they are two birds of a feather. They both believed that its far more important to be nice than it is to be right, no matter the issue. If someone is preaching blasphemy, Lon's answer is to befriend the blasphemer! Be kind, gentle and meek to those who impugn the reputation of the God Who created all things and Who died that we might be saved from the Hell we deserve. The result however is that Lon becomes more like the blasphemer!

                    Heaven forbid that Lon make his decision about what is right doctrine based on reason and sober thought and careful exposition of the scriptures that has as its primary premise the righteousness and justice of the Creator who inspired their authorship. Oh no! It's far better to go with whichever person is the most likable! The one who is saying something he likes hearing, that's the teacher Lon looks for.

                    Heaven forbid that Lon make any effort to figure out what those nasty open theists are upset about or what motivates them to treat certain people like enemies. That would take too much effort and require paying attention to things that he doesn't want to discuss or to even think about. No, its far better to judge an entire theological construct on the basis of how two or three people come off on a website that is intended to be precisely what it is. That's the easy excuse Lon was looking for! All Lon wants to do is to believe whatever tickles his ears and allows him to be nicer than God. Any excuse he can find to justify it will do.

                    Clete

                    sigpic
                    "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Nicer Than God by Bob Enyart

                      Are Christians too nice? Well, Christians today are nicer than God.

                      Or at least they are trying to be so. In the Church there is a standard of niceness that Jesus failed to reach while on earth. Comparing God's attitude and behavior with that of the Church today shows that believers are far more polite, tolerant, understanding and respectful to the wicked than God is.

                      The Church is also less offensive, rude and sarcastic than God's men in the Bible were. And no Christian would ever be caught dead mocking the wicked, as God's men in the Bible sometimes did.
                      The Bible sometimes ministers through ridicule, humor, sarcasm, name-calling, and even mocking. For example, God mocked and defeated the Midianites by giving them a nightmare in which they were attacked by a loaf of bread (Jud. 7:13-14). Elijah, just prior to executing 450 prophets of Baal, "mocked them" as the Bible says, telling them to yell louder to their god so that Baal could hear their prayers since he was either on a trip, sleeping or in the restroom (Hebrew, "private place," 1 Ki. 18:27; and 2 Ki. 6:8-20). And Jesus rebuked the multitudes for not responding in faith to John the Baptist's message as He ridiculed them: "What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind?" (Mat. 11:7).
                      The especially harsh term hypocrite is used in the Gospels twenty-three times. Christ often insulted the scribes, Pharisees and lawyers. He even called the Pharisees blind guides (Mat. 23:16, 24) and sons of hell (Mat. 23:15). Jesus spoke unkind words unacceptable today. He said to Peter "Get behind me, Satan" (Mat. 16:23). He told the Pharisees "You are of your father the devil" (John 8:44), and made a whip and cleared "thieves" from the temple (Mat. 21:12-13; Mark 11:15-17; Luke 19:45-46; John 2:14-15).

                      Gentiles (as symbols of the godless) and sodomites are called "dogs" in the Bible. (For "dog" as a metaphor for filthy homosexuals see Deut. 23:17-18 and Rev. 22:15. And for this term of derision referring also to Gentiles as symbols of the ungodly see Mat. 7:6 with Lev. 22:10; Mat. 15:26; Ps. 22:16, 20; 59:5-6; Phil. 3:2, with this usage easily originating with Ex. 22:31 and Deut. 14:21.) And Jesus was harsh not only to the Pharisees, as some believers wrongly assume, because if so, that would mean that He only loved religious leaders. But the Lord was harsh with all the unrepentant. See for example His name calling use as described above for the word "hypocrite" and see the Lord's use of the word "liar" (John 8:55, "if I say, 'I do not know Him' I shall be a liar like you", where He seems to be speaking with a group of unbelievers). Jesus instructs believers to not "cast your pearls before swine" (Mat. 7:6). Yet the silly dilemma now is, "Who could Christ possibly have meant by that? For we are too loving, tolerant, polite and respectful to refer to any human being by that mean-spirited term."

                      In the King James Version, the seductive women among the people of God are worse than "whores" (Ezek. 16:33). That crude term appears in the Bible dozens of times. The men who use those women are "whoremongers" (1 Tim. 1:10; Heb. 13:4; Rev. 21:8; 22:15), which is the most raw term in the English language to describe promiscuous men. God describes other sinners in terms of filthy excrement (Isa. 64:6) and even worse (2 Ki. 18:27; Isa. 36:12). Sinners truly are repulsive, regardless of how men may try to sanitize them.

                      Since 1991, our radio program, Bob Enyart Live, has been an occasionally harsh and often confrontational news-talk show. The program does not cater to what Christians expect and is sometimes criticized for being offensive.


                      Jesus was offensive. Most people were offended by him. The proof for John the Baptist that Jesus was the Christ was that the blind see, the lame walk and the majority are "offended" by Him (Mat. 11:2-19). As Jesus said, "Blessed is he who is not offended because of Me" (Mat. 11:6; Luke 7:23). In Galilee, Jesus did not plead with his neighbors to understand Him when "they were offended at Him" (Mat. 13:57; Mark 6:3). If unbelievers are offended, so be it (cf. Luke 14:3-4; John 5:8-16). "Shake off the dust from your feet" (Mat. 10:14). But alas, that is no longer a Christian attitude.

                      Christ's apostles asked Him, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard [Your] saying?" (Mat. 15:12). What is the accepted Christian response today after an offense is taken? Quick, apologize! Ask for forgiveness! Tell them you are sorry. How did Jesus respond? He said to ignore the complaints of the unbelievers: "Let them alone. They are blind," (Mat. 15:14). Today, many Christians condemn Christ's attitude as unloving.

                      Jesus promised his followers, "you will be hated by all nations for My name's sake. And then many will be offended" (Mat. 24:9-10). When a Canadian started his call into our talk show with a vicious, "Bob, I hate you..." The response was "Cool. Great! Because Jesus taught that if they hated Me, they will hate you" (see John 15:18-20; 17:14; Mat. 10:22; Luke 21:17). And why did the world hate Jesus? Not because He was overly nice, but as He said, "The world... hates me because I testify of it that its works are evil" (John 7:7). Today Christians think if the world hates them, they have failed. The reverse should be true. It is not that a Christian wants to be hated; it is simply an occupational hazard.

                      Jesus is the Rock. Most believers are unaware, however, that Jesus used this metaphor to issue a graphic threat against the unrepentant. For Christ said that on whom that Rock "falls, it will grind him to powder" (Mat. 21:44; Luke 20:18). Even the Father said that the Son is the "rock of offense" (Isa. 8:14; Rom. 9:33; 1 Pet. 2:8). Offending unbelievers is Christlike in the deepest sense.

                      God utterly forbid drinking blood (Lev. 3:17; 17:14). Israelites, from priests, to Pharisees, to average citizens, were at least superficially obsessed with "keeping the law." Thus when Jesus said whoever "drinks My blood has eternal life," (John 6:54) He was being extremely offensive, and intentionally so. Further, He made no effort whatsoever to clarify Himself. Rather, He let the offense work its ministry. Jesus knew He even offended His own followers. As He said to "His disciples" immediately afterward, "does this offend you?" (John 6:61). After He called the scribes and Pharisees hypocrites, a lawyer said to Him, "Teacher, by saying these things You reproach us also." Jesus answered, "Woe to you also, lawyers!" (Luke 11:45-46)." For those who still didn't get it, Jesus said, "I will show you whom you should fear: Fear Him who, after He has killed, has power to cast into hell; yes, I say to you, fear Him!" (Luke 12:5). Even more emphatic, the New Testament warns, "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Heb. 10:31).

                      Being rough with the wicked does not automatically turn off unbelievers. An Indianapolis Star columnist, Steve Hall, wrote about our BEL program, "But he's cheerful. Oddly, despite the rigidity of his views, Enyart does not come across as a dour, puritanical type." Jesus spoke of a king who arranged a marriage for his son, but those receiving the invitations killed the messengers so the king, who represented Jesus' own Father, "was furious, and he sent out his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city" (Mat. 22:7), and regarding an "evil servant", the Son of Man "will cut him in two" (Mat. 24:51). A harsh style of evangelism is difficult for more sensitive Christians to appreciate. However the biblical approach to communicating with the world includes not only compassion, but severity as well.

                      When the Ad Council airs anti-drug public service announcements (PSAs) that mock "potheads on Jeopardy" who cannot even remember their names, they are not motivated out of hatred, but out of love. Ridicule can and does save lives. "Why do you think they call it dope?" Ad Council spots run on Christian stations and get no criticism for being unloving or unkind. Why is it that Christians never rise up against the effort to stigmatize drug users? If a pagan brings peer pressure against potheads, that is accepted. Let a believer, however, use mockery to stigmatize fornication or sodomy, and the Church rises in condemnation. God, however, does not condemn those who "rebuke the wicked" (see Prov. 24:25).


                      God mocked Jeroboam, who "stretched out his hand from the altar" and ordered the prophet arrested. "Then his hand, which he stretched out toward him, withered, so that he could not pull it back to himself" (1 Ki. 13:4). God mocked the Philistines when they found Dagon their god "fallen on its face before the ark of the Lord. So they took Dagon and set it in its place again" (1 Sam. 5:3). The next morning they found Dagon toppled again, but this time he had lost his head (1 Sam. 5:4). God mocked the idolaters who cut down a branch, and with half of it they make a god to worship and with the other half, they make a fire to cook lunch (Is. 44:14-17). Another carves an idol of stone and says to it "wake up" (Hab. 2:18-19). (See also Jer. 49:1.)

                      When a harsh word is needed God uses a harsh word. This is true in the Old and New Testaments. Herod beheaded John the Baptist for "rebuking" the king for "all the evils which Herod had done" (Luke 3:19) and for condemning the tetrarch for incestuous adultery (Mat. 14:3-4; Mark 6:17-18; Lev. 18:16; 20:21) with "Herodias, his brother Philip's wife" (Luke 3:19). Jesus warned of "the leaven of Herod" (Mark 8:15). When notified that "Herod wants to kill You," (Luke 13:31), Christ responded without respect, "Go, tell that fox, 'I cast out demons'…" (Luke 13:32). Then in a parable Jesus said, "bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me" (Luke 19:27), and of course He was speaking about Himself.

                      The Bible does not say, "Hate the sin, love the sinner." It says, "As a man thinks in his heart, so is he" (Prov. 23:7). Thus, the problem isn't his sin as much as it is him. Yes, "the Lord hates... hands that shed innocent blood," (Prov. 6:16-17), but those hands are attached to the man and controlled by his heart (i.e., his mind). So God hates "all workers of iniquity" (Ps 5:5). "The Lord abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man" (Ps 5:6). Also "the wicked and the one who loves violence [God] hates." (Ps 11:5). So not only does King David say, "Oh, that You would slay the wicked, O God! ... Do I not hate them, O Lord who hate You? And do I not loathe those who rise up against You? I hate them with perfect hatred" (Ps. 139:19, 21-22). Of God's own nation, He says, "I have hated it" (Jer. 12:8). Further, "The face of the Lord is against those who do evil" (Ps 34:16). God "loves righteousness and hate[s] wickedness (Ps. 45:7).

                      There are six things "the Lord hates," including "a heart that devises wicked plans… a false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord among brethren" (Prov. 6:16-19). And God reminds us "All their wickedness is in Gilgal, for there I hated them. Because of the evil of their deeds I will drive them from My house; I will love them no more" (Hos. 9:15). As Moses recorded that God said, "if you do not obey Me... My soul shall abhor you" (Lev. 26:27-30).

                      Even in the New Testament, Paul wrote, "Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9) introducing the concept of hypocritical love. What is hypocritical love? "Should you… love those who hate the Lord? Therefore the wrath of the Lord is upon you" (2 Chr. 19:2). Warning the wicked of the coming judgment is harsh, but is a necessary component of acceptable love. A love that is not hypocritical rebukes and condemns, and then points the way to God.

                      God uses different methods to communicate the Gospel to people at different depths of depravity. At times, a Christian can pray with an unbeliever. At other times, a believer might ridicule the unrepentant in hopes of waking him up. Painful communication though is in no way reserved just for non-Christians.

                      Paul uses dripping sarcasm telling the Corinthians that they do not need his counsel because they are full, rich, wise, strong and distinguished. They are even like kings, and all that without Paul's help (1 Cor. 4:8, 10). Sarcasm stigmatizes destructive behavior and prods people toward righteousness (1 Cor. 4:14). Paul also fell short of today's compassionate Christianity when he wrote that the government should minister terror, wrath and vengeance against the evildoer and that the sword should be used against them (Rom. 13:3-4). The Apostle also erred by today's standards calling unbelievers fools (Rom. 1:22) and the Galatians fools (Gal. 3:1, 3). Incidentally, Jesus also called men fools (Mat. 23:17, 19; 25:2-8; Luke 11:40; 12:20) when appropriate but never "without a cause" (Mat. 5:22) according to His teaching. Proverbs says that "he who hates correction is stupid" (Prov. 12:1) and a generation earlier King David wrote, "The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.'" (Ps. 53:1). Thus, atheists, for example, are fools and to always withhold this knowledge from them is cruel.

                      Christians enjoy quoting, "No weapon formed against you shall prosper." However many shudder at the rest of the verse. For thus says the Lord, "Every tongue which rises against you in judgment you shall condemn" (Isa. 54:17). Jesus taught that human beings will condemn the wicked. "The men of Nineveh will rise in the judgment with this generation and condemn it" (Mat. 12:41). Speaking of vengeance, the saints in heaven who no longer have a shred of false religiosity seek vengeance. For of course, vengeance is good, for "vengeance is Mine" says the Lord (Deut. 32:35; Rom. 12:19) saith the Lord. True, we ourselves are not to exact vengeance on our enemies, "but rather give place to wrath" and that place is with "the governing authorities... For rulers are... a terror... to evil. ... for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil" (Rom. 12:19; 13:1, 3-4). This "is the patience and the faith of the saints." So in heaven, "the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God... cried with a loud voice, saying, 'How long, O Lord, holy and true, until You judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?'” (Rev. 6:9-10). Once that vengeance is complete, an angel will say, "Rejoice over her, O heaven, and you holy apostles and prophets, for God has avenged you on her" (Rev. 18:20). Remember that Jesus said, "For God so loved the world." Two verses later though He added, "but he who does not believe is condemned already" (John 3:18). By today's Christian standard, no unbeliever would know that he is condemned, because most believers will not communicate this vital truth. John 3:16 is nice. John 3:18 is not nice.

                      WWJD? WDJD? Some have called Bob Enyart Live rude. Jesus was rude. We're not Jesus. (He was a person, we're a radio talk show But the Apostle Paul said to "Follow me as I follow Christ," and he was rude too. Jesus is an example as are the prophets and the apostles. The Lord was asked a question that goes to the very heart of His ministry. "Who gave you this authority?" (Mat. 21:23). Within the answer to that question lies eternal life, yet Christ was not inclined to answer. Rather, He asked them a question, which they failed to answer (Mat. 21:24-27). Therefore He said to them that neither would He answer their question (Mat. 21:27; see also Luke 22:67 and John 12:34-36).

                      When people misunderstood Jesus He often made no effort to explain Himself. Quite to the contrary, He often purposely let His hearers misconstrue His words (John 2:18-22). Jesus let people walk away in unbelief without running after them. The Bible does not record Him as saying, "I'm sorry, did you misunderstand me?" He is the "stumbling block," and if men wanted to stumble, He let them. For those who want to hang themselves, He invites them (Rev. 22:11). Jesus made the rope available. He is that rope (Rom. 9:33).

                      Jesus was a man, not a girl. Christianity today has been emasculated. Men and women are different and they communicate differently. Women are softer and nicer than men, and thank God that they are. However, men are not supposed to be women. Today, Christian ministers are expected to behave like women. That foolishness is a death sentence for many unbelievers. Strength, confidence, conviction and tough love appeal to those who are searching. Thus Jesus is a beacon to real seekers. But for those wanting to get lost, Christ is like a street sign that has been reversed by a troublemaker.

                      Today we are way nicer than God. It is tragic. This spiritual plateau that the Church has reached conveniently reduces the chances for confrontation. Nice people rarely rebuke, judge, confront, accuse or condemn. Nice people have less stress. It seems the only ones that Christians are quick to judge and condemn are fellow believers who judge and condemn the wicked. Go figure.
                      -Bob Enyart
                      sigpic
                      "The [open view] is an attempt to provide a more Biblically faithful, rationally coherent, and practically satisfying account of God and the divine-human relationship..." - Dr. John Sanders

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Clete View Post
                        I'm just continually baffled by the ridiculous things these people say in defense of their doctrine. They contradict one doctrine in order to defend another and refuse to allowed their own mind to make the connections required to see the contradiction.
                        Clete, I feel the same way about those who teach that the Jews who lived under the law could not be saved apart from works despite the fact that the Lord Jesus said the following to the Jews who lived under the law:

                        "Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life" (Jn.6:47).

                        I am baffled that those who teach that the Jews who lived under the law could not be saved apart from works despite the Savior's clear words at John 6:47.

                        Comments?

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X