Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Grace History Project: Darby

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Theology Club: Grace History Project: Darby

    http://gracehistoryproject.blogspot....date=false&m=0

  • #2
    Unshackled

    A short, but good read on how Darby came to his Dispensational Perspective.

    He did not invent it, rather, as he came to understand his identity in Christ through time in Scripture, the eyes of his understanding sufficiently educated by this, he was now able to see that Israel is not the Body and the Body is not Israel.

    If you have ever had a moment in any area of your life where seeing some things clearly for the first time allowed you to see other things as a result, you have a sense of the experience Darby experienced that resulted in his recovery of truths that had been lost for quite some time.

    http://www.pre-trib.org/articles/vie...nd-the-rapture

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Danoh View Post

      He did not invent it
      I know.

      We don't tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters exist.
      They already know monsters exist.
      We tell our children fairy tales so that they will know that monsters can be killed.

      Comment


      • #4
        Did Tet Nelson Elestai invent Tetelestaism?
        Originally posted by Interplanner
        They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
        Originally posted by Interplanner
        You're too literal to get it.
        Originally posted by Interplanner
        The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
          Did Tet Nelson Elestai invent Tetelestaism?
          Check Wikipedia
          All of my ancestors are human.
          Originally posted by Squeaky
          That explains why your an idiot.
          Originally posted by God's Truth
          Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
          Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
          (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

          1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
          (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

          Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

          Comment


          • #6
            Darby was flawed in doctrine and in character, he taught much good doctrine...but it is well to know that he is flawed
            One lavished upon in the Beloved
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
              Darby was flawed in doctrine and in character, he taught much good doctrine...but it is well to know that he is flawed
              It's always good to impugn a dead man's doctrine and character with vague and unspecified accusations.
              All of my ancestors are human.
              Originally posted by Squeaky
              That explains why your an idiot.
              Originally posted by God's Truth
              Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
              Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
              (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

              1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
              (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

              Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

              Comment


              • #8
                Read the history of the Brethren movement, there was nothing vague about what Darby did. Look up Bethesda.

                If anyone is going to seriously consider Darby's work [and he is worth looking at] then it will be wise to look closely at him.

                ...it is no different than if he is alive or dead. We scrutinise ministers [or we should] before we start imbibing their doctrine.
                One lavished upon in the Beloved
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
                  Darby was flawed in doctrine and in character, he taught much good doctrine...but it is well to know that he is flawed
                  So are you and me

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
                    Read the history of the Brethren movement, there was nothing vague about what Darby did. Look up Bethesda.
                    Why are so many people here on TOL so ridiculously illogical?

                    I said that YOU were vague. And you WERE.

                    Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
                    If anyone is going to seriously consider Darby's work [and he is worth looking at] then it will be wise to look closely at him.
                    I don't "seriously consider his work", so I guess that I'm fine.

                    Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
                    ...it is no different than if he is alive or dead. We scrutinise ministers [or we should] before we start imbibing their doctrine.
                    Once again, I don't "imbibe his doctrine", so I'm fine.
                    All of my ancestors are human.
                    Originally posted by Squeaky
                    That explains why your an idiot.
                    Originally posted by God's Truth
                    Father figure, Son figure, and Holy Spirit figure.
                    Col 2:9 (AKJV/PCE)
                    (2:9) For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

                    1Tim 4:10 (AKJV/PCE)
                    (4:10) For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

                    Something that was SPOKEN OF since the world began CANNOT be the SAME thing as something KEPT SECRET since the world began.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Right Divider View Post
                      Why are so many people here on TOL so ridiculously illogical?

                      I said that YOU were vague. And you WERE.


                      I don't "seriously consider his work", so I guess that I'm fine.


                      Once again, I don't "imbibe his doctrine", so I'm fine.
                      Well if somebody does seriously consider his work, or are fastidious about from who they imbibe doctrine

                      ....it is well to know that Darby is flawed
                      One lavished upon in the Beloved
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by patrick jane View Post
                        So are you and me
                        It will be well for us to know what those flaws are then.
                        One lavished upon in the Beloved
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          ....I don't want to catch something
                          One lavished upon in the Beloved
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Totton Linnet View Post
                            Read the history of the Brethren movement, there was nothing vague about what Darby did. Look up Bethesda.

                            If anyone is going to seriously consider Darby's work [and he is worth looking at] then it will be wise to look closely at him.

                            ...it is no different than if he is alive or dead. We scrutinise ministers [or we should] before we start imbibing their doctrine.
                            I "know no man after the flesh." Background, good, bad, circumcision, uncircumcision, you name it; what I look at is whether or not any aspect of his words are true to Scripture.

                            Its why I do not take sides, other what's right, no matter who. Its amazing how much more one is able to learn; as a result.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                              I "know no man after the flesh." Background, good, bad, circumcision, uncircumcision, you name it; what I look at is whether or not any aspect of his words are true to Scripture.

                              Its why I do not take sides, other what's right, no matter who. Its amazing how much more one is able to learn; as a result.
                              I can benefit from reading Darby in relation to Israel, many agree with him and he did bring light to bear on the matter.


                              But by not being careful a very great many people have imbibed Darby's teaching on the "secret rapture" it is a plague in the church...many on this forum believe it, Darby is the father of it or at least it was through him that the doctrine gained popularity.


                              ....Tots would have sounded a word of caution
                              One lavished upon in the Beloved
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X