Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WHAT GAL 2:20 MEANS TO BELIEVERS !!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Danoh View Post
    From what I have read from your posts, you and I perhaps have a same understanding about many things than most anyone else on here.

    Doesn't mean I should hound them about it. I'll start a thread about something; if it goes nowhere, so be it.

    Other times I'll engage some on here who I differ with on some things, it goes nowhere, and I leave it at that.

    Why?

    Because I was fine before discovering any of our differences. in understanding. If anything, I find these differences stimulating to think thru.

    Outside of that, I find no need to have others on a same page with my own understanding.

    "Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind... for whatsoever is not of faith is sin," Rom. 14: 5, 23.

    Anyway, let me know on my above, Brock on Rom. 16:26 question.

    Thanks

    Hi and I will respond as best I can and looking at some other verses !!

    I am not offended with anyone and you are amusing me , with what you say about me !!

    By the way I have Bullinger's book on " How to Enjoy the Bible " and can defend against them .

    I got busy today and at my age get tired and just relax as I have other things to do during the day .

    I hurt myself very bad and have almost recovered !!

    dan p
    Last edited by DAN P; August 20th, 2015, 11:37 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by DAN P View Post
      Hi and I will respond as best I can and looking at some other verses !!

      I am not offended with anyone and you are amusing me , with what you say about me !!

      By the way I have Bullinger's book on " How to Enjoy the Bible " and can defend against them .

      I got busy today and at my age get tired and just relax as I have other things to do during the day .

      I got hurt myself very bad and have almost recovered !!

      dan p
      To your quick recovery, brother, and your stedfastness therein. D

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
        I started a new thread asking for evidence that the present dispensation began at Acts 9 and no one was able to present any such evidence.

        On the same thread I presented evidence that it began at Acts 13 and no one was able to prove anything I said about that was in error!

        Hi Jerry , and why not start an OP , here or on that other section on dispensationalism for Acts 13 !!

        dan p

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by DAN P View Post
          Hi Jerry , and why not start an OP , here or on that other section on dispensationalism for Acts 13 !!

          dan p
          Done!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by DAN P View Post
            Hi to all and what does Rom 16:26 mean ?

            There are many who believe that Eph 3:5 was made KNOWN to the OT apostles and prophets by the Spirit and how can that be if we believe Col 1:25-27 ??

            Paul is the one who wrote about Grace in his epistles and we see from Eph 3:1 it is written to Gentiles. While Rom 16:26 has 2 verbs ALL in the Aorist Tense which happened when Paul wrote them, or in the Past Tense !!

            The verb PROPHETIC / PROPHETIKOS which means 'proceeding from a Prophet - which is Paul, it means PROPHETIC !!

            This message is written to Gentiles , verse 26 !!

            And Eph 3:5 is not speaking to OT apostles or Prophets and is obvious to me this was before Acts 13 !!

            I know that R C Brock believed that books like 1 Corinthians, Romans and Galatians were written first !

            As 1 Cor 1:17 says; Paul was NOT sent to Baptize BUT to preach the Gospel, not with words of wisdom in order that the CROSS of Christ should not be made empty !

            This means that Paul could never have preached the Kingdom of Heaven message ,

            I could write more , like Rom about 1:1, and many more passages, as there is no room for Acts 13, as Paul's ministry began as soon as he received the MYSTERY, Rom 16:25 and 26 !!

            Robert C Brock asserted the PROPHETIC SCRIPTURES referred to Paul's epistles, not to OT writings, and PROPHECY is mentioned in 12 of Paul's epistles , Philemon being the lone exception !!

            dan p
            Thanks, DP

            By the way, I corrected some of your expressions in the above; hope that was ok.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Danoh View Post
              Thanks, DP

              By the way, I corrected some of your expressions in the above; hope that was ok.

              Hi amd I am always in a hurry and I find myself correcting my owm posts , no big deal !!

              dan p

              Comment

              Working...
              X