Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

One on One: Stripe & genuineoriginal - The Hydroplate Theory

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Great!

    What do you not understand?
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Stripe View Post
      Great!

      What do you not understand?
      It took a lot of effort for the guy in the video to pull off the orange peel.

      When did the crust of the earth get pulled off and put back on top of the mantle, and what were the forces that pulled off the crust and replaced it?
      Learn to read what is written.

      _____
      The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
      ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

      Comment


      • #33
        Uh.... It didn't. Only the parts I cut off the orange got removed. The rest I had to separate from the orange in order to show how the plates moved.
        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
        E≈mc2
        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
        -Bob B.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Stripe View Post
          Uh.... It didn't. Only the parts I cut off the orange got removed. The rest I had to separate from the orange in order to show how the plates moved.
          But the crust cannot move unless it is separated from the mantle.
          Learn to read what is written.

          _____
          The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
          ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

          Comment


          • #35
            Yep. Subterranean water was separating the crust from the mantle. The crust was created within water, not attached to the mantle.
            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
            E≈mc2
            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
            -Bob B.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Stripe View Post
              Yep. Subterranean water was separating the crust from the mantle. The crust was created within water, not attached to the mantle.
              Are you referring to the Conrad discontinuity or the Mohorovičić discontinuity?
              Learn to read what is written.

              _____
              The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
              ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
                Are you referring to the Conrad discontinuity or the Mohorovičić discontinuity?
                The firmament created within water, dividing the waters above from the waters below. The thing that ruptured forming the fountains of the great deep. The crust of the Earth, according to the Hydroplate Theory, was not attached in any significant way to the mantle.

                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I think this thread has run its course. Thanks for your time, genuineoriginal.

                  See you in the trenches.
                  Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                  E≈mc2
                  "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                  "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                  -Bob B.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                    I think this thread has run its course. Thanks for your time, genuineoriginal.

                    See you in the trenches.
                    I think there is one more thing to address.
                    Flood Phase. Each side of the rupture was basically a 10-mile-high cliff. Compressive, vibrating loads greatly exceeded the rock’s crushing strength in the bottom half of the cliff face, so the bottom half continually crumbled, collapsed, and spilled out into the jetting fountains. That removed support for the top half of the cliff, so it also fragmented and fell into the pulverizing supersonic flow. Consequently, the 46,000-mile-long rupture rapidly grew to an average width of about 800 miles all around the earth.Water trapped in the spongelike openings in the chamber’s roof and floor was steadily forced into the chamber during the flood, so the hydroplates settled slowly. Sediments swept up in the escaping flood waters gave the water a thick, muddy consistency. These sediments rapidly settled out over the earth’s surface, trapping and burying many plants and animals. The world’s fossils then began to form.
                    According to the Hydroplate Theory, there was an 800 mile gap between South America and Africa that was spewing water and mud up both sides of the gap onto the continents, burying plants and animals to form fossils.

                    The fossil beds show a continuity across oceans that cannot be explained by an 800 mile gap and sediment flowing in opposite directions on either side of the gap.


                    To a lot of people, it looks like the continents were joined together during the time the sediment layers were deposited.
                    Since the sediment layers were deposited during the flood, the continents were joined during the time of the flood, not separated as they need to be to fit the Hydroplate Theory.
                    Learn to read what is written.

                    _____
                    The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                    ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Deposition either side of the rupture would have been very similar.
                      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                      E≈mc2
                      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                      -Bob B.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                        Deposition either side of the rupture would have been very similar.
                        The evidence from Paleocurrents disagrees.
                        What are Paleocurrents?
                        Paleocurrents are directions of movement of fluid and the entrained particles responsible for the
                        formation of sedimentary rocks. These current directions can be retrieved from sedimentary
                        rocks by measuring the direction and/or sense of paleocurrent indicators preserved within the
                        rocks themselves. These paleocurrent indicators include crossbeds, ripple marks, flute and
                        groove casts, parting lineations, fossil orientations, imbrications and other more obscure features
                        of sedimentary rocks. Crossbeds are faint layering visible in sandstones and other clastic rocks
                        (rocks made of particles of other rocks – sandstone, shale, etc.) that strike diagonally across the
                        thickness of the beds. Ripple marks are miniature dunes resulting from the transport of sand and
                        mud that are often seen on the banks of rivers and streams. Flute casts, groove casts and tool
                        marks are structures reflecting deposition in turbidites and other mass flow phenomena that are
                        seen most often on the underside of rock layers. Parting lineations are trains of sand grains
                        exposed when layers of sandstone are pried apart that reflect the movement of the grains during
                        deposition. Imbrication is the domino-like orientation of clasts resulting when the grains achieve
                        the most stable position during deposition. All of these features are capable of yielding the kinds
                        of data required for reconstruction of paleocurrents.
                        Learn to read what is written.

                        _____
                        The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                        ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          How?
                          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                          E≈mc2
                          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                          -Bob B.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                            How?
                            Sedimentary layers that span continents show that the water flowed across South American and Africa at the same time with the same sediment and the same pre-fossilized plants and animals.

                            This would not happen if the water erupted from the middle of the areas covered with the same sediment, since the sediment would be different on both sides of the gap and would not show the continuity that led to the acknowledgment of Pangaea as a super-continent.

                            The water flow from the Hydroplate Theory would come from the Atlantic and towards the coastlines on either side of the Atlantic washing over both sides and continuing away from the Atlantic, but the Paleocurrents show many different directions of water flow that do not correspond to the flow which would be predicted from the Hydroplate Theory.

                            The "fit" of the continents of South America and Africa led scientists into searching for evidence that would prove whether the land masses were joined, and they discovered plenty of evidence. Dr. Brown doesn't address that evidence, but concentrates only on the "fit" and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge to show how the continents could not have been joined together. This is understandable, since Dr. Brown is one of the first to make sure people know that he is not a geologist.

                            But it is the geological evidence that prevents me from accepting the Hydroplate Theory as the definitive answer.

                            I think this is the best explanation I have seen for the flood:
                            Eden as Pangea and the Flood as a Mass Extinction: Catastrophes at the Time of the End
                            Learn to read what is written.

                            _____
                            The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                            ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by genuineoriginal View Post
                              The water flow from the Hydroplate Theory would come from the Atlantic and towards the coastlines on either side of the Atlantic washing over both sides and continuing away from the Atlantic, but the Paleocurrents show many different directions of water flow that do not correspond to the flow which would be predicted from the Hydroplate Theory.
                              Seds were not deposited by erupting or fast moving waters.
                              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                              E≈mc2
                              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                              -Bob B.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                                Seds were not deposited by erupting or fast moving waters.
                                Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                                Learn to read what is written.

                                _____
                                The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim to understand the science are precisely the people who are blind to the evidence.
                                ~ Dr Freeman Dyson

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X