ECT Christian Zionism and Dispensationalism

northwye

New member
Christian Zionism and Dispensationalism

https://religionandpolitics.org/…/whats-so-american-about-…/

"God’s Country: Christian Zionism in America
By Samuel Goldman
University of Pennsylvania, 2018"

Stephen Sizer published, in 2004, an important book which is critical of what he calls Christian Zionism. By Christian Zionism, Sizer means dispensationalism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Sizer

"In 2004, Sizer adapted his PhD thesis into a book, Christian Zionism - Road Map to Armageddon.....He claims that Christian Zionism has led millions of Christians astray and helped to tip the world on its side heavy with military artillery."

But what was meant by Christian Zionism in history is larger than the church theology called dispensationalism. Christian Zionism was a movement in the English speaking nations before dispensationalism came on the scene in the 19th century.

Here is a quote by Samuel Goldman in "God’s Country: Christian Zionism in America, " 2018: "God’s continued covenant with the Jewish people did not, of course, seamlessly translate into Protestant respect for Judaism. Most theologians expected Jews to convert “from unbelief” as a precondition for their restoration to Palestine."

Christians can make an effort to lead Jews to Jesus Christ and to be born again in the Gospel of Christ without changing that Gospel of Christ at all. In fact, for men to change the Gospel of Christ would be to make it into a man-made theological system, which would weaken its ability to transform people.

John Darby said that the "Church has sought to settle itself here, but it has no place on the earth... [Though] making a most constructive parenthesis, it forms no part of the regular order of God's earthly plans, but is merely an
interruption of them to give a fuller character and meaning to
them..."

John. N. Darby, 'The Character of Office in The Present Dispensation'
Collected Writings., Eccl. I, Vol. I, p. 94.

"Them" are all physical Israel. The church, for Darby, exists to "give fuller character and meaning to all physical Israel."

John Darby, known as the father of dispensationalism, teaches that the ekklesia, translated in the modern Bibles as the church, is just a parenthesis, and is not the main purpose of God. Instead John Darby says the ekklesia, the church, was established by God in order to fill in the parenthesis between the time the kingdom was rejected by the Jews and the time when it will be re-establiahed and accepted by the Jews. After the "parenthetic church age" is finished, then God will return to his first love, Old Covenant Israel.

Note that in the William Tyndale New Testament of about 1526, ekklesia was consistently translated as congregation. except for Acts 14: 13 and Acts 19: 37 where he used churche, meaning a pagan place of worship. Tyndale broke with Catholic tradition and used congregation for ekklesia something which might have contributed to his being strangled at the stake by the Catholics.

And after the death of John Calvin, Theodore Beza in 1556 returned to the use of church to translate ekklesia - and the Geneva Bible followed him, using church instead of congregation. Beza returned to the Catholic translation of ekklesia as "chirche."

In dispensationalism the church, with the implication that it is the Body of Christ, is a parenthesis, i.e., a temporary thing lying between God's two dealings with national Israel.

But Ephesians 1: 21-23 says the body of Christ,is the fullness of God.

"Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
22. And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church,
23. Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all." Ephesians 1: 21-23

The Body of Christ, all the elect of God now in the New Covenant, is not just a temporary group. Dispensationalism, though says that at the Rapture the ekklesia, the church, will meet Christ in the air, before the Great Tribulation, which in a way contradicts the teaching that the ekklesia is just a temporary group, while the multitude of Old Covenant Israel remain the chosen people.

Here dispensationalism makes a big change from the doctrine about the ekklesia given by Paul and what dispensationalism postulates about the ekklesia being merely a temporary group which is to exist between two dispensations of Israel, where Israel is defined literally as being the multitude of Israel, who are of the physical bloodline from Abraham.

Dispensationalism teaches that God has two distinctly different peoples, Old Covenant Israel and the Church.

"Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne so that in eternity, '...never the twain, Israel and church, shall meet." Lewis S. Chafer, Systematic Theology (Dallas, Dallas Seminary Press, 1975), Vol. 4. pp. 315-323..

In his book, Dispensationalism (1966), Charles Ryrie says "The
essence of Dispensationalism, then, is the distinction between Israel
and the church." (page 3, "Dispensationalism")

J. Dwight Pentecost is another dispensationalist theologian who in his
book Things To Come ( 1965) says "The church
and Israel are two distinct groups with whom God has a divine plan.
The church is a mystery, unrevealed in the Old Testament. (page 193,
J. Dwight Pentecost, Things To Come, Zondervan, 1965).

Lewis S. Chafer admits that dispensationalism changed the New Testament.

Lewis S. Chafer said that dispensationalism has "...changed the Bible from being a mass of more or less conflicting
writings into a classified and easily assimilated revelation of both
the earthly and heavenly purposes of God, which reach on into eternity
to come.." Lewis. S. Chafer, ‘Dispensationalism,’ Bibliotheca Sacra, 93 (October 1936), 410, 416, 446-447

Chafer, a founder of dispensationalism which became a newer form of Chritian Zionism in the 19th century, following John Darby and C.I. Scofield, claimed the Bible is a mass or more or less conflicting writings and that dispensationalism or Christian Zionism makes the Bible more easily classified and assimilated, or more easily understood.

Dispensationalism creates a systematic theology - "of rightly Dividing" the New Testament teachings - based upon the dispensationalist view that Old Covenant Israel remains God's Chosen people and that God is to bring in another dispensation in which physical Israel will be restored. Some dispensationalists, though, will dispute this view of what dispensationalism is about.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Dispensationalism teaches that God has two distinctly different peoples, Old Covenant Israel and the Church.

When the nation of Israel was in covenant relationship with God circumcision was a requirement for the sons of Israel and any uncirumcised male was cut off from that nation:

"This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you...And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant" (Gen.17:10-11,14).​

On the other hand, circumcision profits no one during the Church age, as witnessed by Paul's words here:

"For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love" (Gal.5:6).​

The Scriptures reveal that when the nation of Israel was in a covenant relationship with the LORD the children of Israel were a special people unto Himself:

"For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth" (Deut.7:6).​

On the other hand, during the Church age there are no special people unto the LORD except for believers and in the Body of Christ there is no distinction between the Jews and those of other nationalities:

"And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all"
(Col.3:10-11).​

These facts serve to prove that when the LORD's program for Israel is in view then that program cannot be about the Body of Christ because His two different programs are mutually exclusive. In other words, when the Divine plan toward Israel is in effect then the children of Israel are above all people on the face of the earth so therefore it is impossible that at the same time the Divine plan is also toward the Body of Christ where there is no difference between the Jews and the Gentiles.

Sometimes in order to understand the Bible a person must use a little common sense.
 

northwye

New member
"These facts serve to prove that when the LORD's program for Israel is in view then that program cannot be about the Body of Christ because His two different programs are mutually exclusive. In other words, when the Divine plan toward Israel is in effect then the children of Israel are above all people on the face of the earth so therefore it is impossible that at the same time the Divine plan is also toward the Body of Christ where there is no difference between the Jews and the Gentiles."

This is a short explanation of the dispensationalist doctrine that God will, sometime in the future, create a dispensation in which physical Israel is restored. We know that dispensationalism teaches that there is to be such a dispensation in the future. But this explanation does not deal with what the New Testament says which is relevant to this doctrine of dispensationalism.

Hebrews 8: 6-7, 13 says Jesus Christ created "...a more excellent ministry" and "he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises. For if that covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second...In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old Now that which decayeth and waxeth old, is ready to vanish away."

The same gist meaning saying that Jesus Christ created a New Covenant and took away the Old Covenant is found in II Corinthians 3: 7-11.

"But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:
8. How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?
9. For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.
10.For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth.
11. For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious. "

In II Corinthians 3: 7-11 Paul does not mention a New Covenant or an Old Covenant, but that is what he is talking about. Here Paul calls the New Covenant which Hebrews 8: refers to as a better covenant the ministration of the Spirit (II Corinthians 3: 8) and the ministration of righteousness (II Corinthians 3: 9).

In teaching that God will, in the future, create a different dispensation in which Old Covenant Israel is restored, dispensationalism is changing a fundamental doctrine of the New Testament.

How do we understand such a change in doctrine from Hebrews 8: 6-7, 13 and II Corinthians 3: 7-11 to the dispensationalist doctrine that God will instead restore Old Covenant Israel?

The dispensationalist literalist method of Bible Interpretation only goes so far in explaining how this radical change in New Testament doctrine on the "replacement" of the Old Covenant with the New Covenant came about. It is more than just an interpretation; it is an ignoring of the New Testament doctrine as the absolute authority and going off alone to create a different doctrine, following John Darby's idea that the Body of Christ (ekklesia) is merely a parenthesis between two dispensations of physical Israel.

And we do not know the details of what the dispensationalist ministration will be, because such a dispensation is not in the New Testament. Its in a man made Church Theology - dispensationalism, which took over Christian Zionism, which in history did not make such radical changes in New Testament doctrine.

A list of details of a restored physical Israel would violate what Paul explains in Colossians 2: 16-17 "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
17. Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ."
 
Top