Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

REPORT: TOL Statement of faith

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [QUOTE=Charity;4295714][QUOTE=Ben Masada;4295277]
    Originally posted by Charity View Post

    The following Easter, it was the men that said to the pale woman who pecked threw the door crack, it must be peters ghost, for even they new that Thomas was killed one year after Jesus, an to please the crowd peter was taken to. An Peter should be held until Easter Sunday to be presented to the Jews, wither his rising or not again! This is none of King David's statues, yearly human sacrifices, an one year later it seems people still needed evidence of full body resurrection, willing even to sacrifice their best being to see if he can rise?
    I agree with you because there is nothing at all Jewish in this text above. It must have been written by some one who believed in ghosts and in bodily resurrection.

    Comment


    • [QUOTE=Ben Masada;4298062][QUOTE=Charity;4295714]
      Originally posted by Ben Masada View Post

      I agree with you because there is nothing at all Jewish in this text above. It must have been written by some one who believed in ghosts and in bodily resurrection.
      I agree, there are those that preferred to believe in riseing the flesh above the returning soul within a new temple body.
      Hence, theory must be, a prophet begins his work perishes, returns latter in a prepared body grows up in the stall - hearing an learning from his very historical words, he rises extremely quickly to continue, nothing more powerful than a prophet forfilling his own phrophecy! That was the key, hence the new - in rising the body- people became blinded to King David's Statues an throne. Children grew up in the stall to rise there own flesh, Jesus would have no chance on deaf ears, I an my father are in me! Son of David, to be "called" the son of God

      Read The last page of the Jerusalem bible.

      I Jesus had to send my angel to the church's (after my body's destruction I am cut off from the living with no sound, I tell you all, )
      I AM FROM THE LINE OF DAVID
      Extremely important, choice of foundations.king David has an extremely hard task to unveil his return an glorify his God.
      Last edited by Charity; April 23rd, 2015, 03:33 PM.

      Comment


      • [QUOTE=Charity;4298367][QUOTE=Ben Masada;4298062]
        Originally posted by Charity View Post

        I agree, there are those that preferred to believe in riseing the flesh above the returning soul within a new temple body.
        Hence, theory must be, a prophet begins his work perishes, returns latter in a prepared body grows up in the stall - hearing an learning from his very historical words, he rises extremely quickly to continue, nothing more powerful than a prophet forfilling his own phrophecy! That was the key, hence the new - in rising the body- people became blinded to King David's Statues an throne. Children grew up in the stall to rise there own flesh, Jesus would have no chance on deaf ears, I an my father are in me! Son of David, to be "called" the son of God

        Read The last page of the Jerusalem bible.

        I Jesus had to send my angel to the church's (after my body's destruction I am cut off from the living with no sound, I tell you all, )I AM FROM THE LINE OF DAVID. Extremely important, choice of foundations.king David has an extremely hard task to unveil his return an glorify his God.
        Okay, now, would you please quote wherefrom you got Jesus saying that he was from the line of David!? What I have is that the idea was fabricated by Paul according to II Tim. 2:8. And Paul said to his disciple Timothy that it was according to his gospel that Jesus was of the line of David and that he had resurrected. Besides, that Jesus was the son of God, was also from the gospel preached by Paul when he showed up in Jerusalem. (Acts 9:20) That's how Christianity rose. Today, no one can document any thing as true.

        Comment


        • [QUOTE=Ben Masada;4300058][QUOTE=Charity;4298367]
          Originally posted by Ben Masada View Post

          Okay, now, would you please quote wherefrom you got Jesus saying that he was from the line of David!? What I have is that the idea was fabricated by Paul according to II Tim. 2:8. And Paul said to his disciple Timothy that it was according to his gospel that Jesus was of the line of David and that he had resurrected. Besides, that Jesus was the son of God, was also from the gospel preached by Paul when he showed up in Jerusalem. (Acts 9:20) That's how Christianity rose. Today, no one can document any thing as true.
          Hi Ben, Most important...the original saying was for King David an about King Davids son. That son, after he should fall asleep, one from his own "seed" that would proceed from his bowels, Thats simply genetic....
          Rather a Task to rise Davids Kingdom from achient instruction scrolls? the challenge was excepted by more than just jesus, what confused people - the production of body's, flesh an blood being separate from the uncorruptible soul. I just wish Paul Had gotten on with the Fail bit, all prophecy shall fail...we only know in part.
          prophecies, they shall fail; knowledge, it shall vanish away. all is vanity.


          Johns your Pope!


          To Answer your question, the words..
          I AM FROM THE LINE OF DAVID, are written in The Jerusalem BIBLE. Last page.
          This bible was not allowed to be sold in the united states an phillipine's 1900's.
          I understand that there are major fabrications in the new testament as they attempt to piece things together. many generations have been silent an blind about King David when Jesus lived, details of his Kingdom had been in Darkness for nearly 500 years. both the jewish nations had no remembrance they had to be re-taught....that teaching may also have been corrupted, an was certainly obstructed by the new catholic roman testament

          Comment


          • [QUOTE=Charity;4300325][QUOTE=Ben Masada;4300058]
            Originally posted by Charity View Post

            Hi Ben, Most important...the original saying was for King David an about King Davids son. That son, after he should fall asleep, one from his own "seed" that would proceed from his bowels, Thats simply genetic....
            Rather a Task to rise Davids Kingdom from achient instruction scrolls? the challenge was excepted by more than just jesus, what confused people - the production of body's, flesh an blood being separate from the uncorruptible soul. I just wish Paul Had gotten on with the Fail bit, all prophecy shall fail...we only know in part.
            prophecies, they shall fail; knowledge, it shall vanish away. all is vanity.

            Johns your Pope!

            To Answer your question, the words..
            I AM FROM THE LINE OF DAVID, are written in The Jerusalem BIBLE. Last page.
            This bible was not allowed to be sold in the united states an phillipine's 1900's.
            I understand that there are major fabrications in the new testament as they attempt to piece things together. many generations have been silent an blind about King David when Jesus lived, details of his Kingdom had been in Darkness for nearly 500 years. both the jewish nations had no remembrance they had to be re-taught....that teaching may also have been corrupted, an was certainly obstructed by the new catholic roman testament
            It does not matter; I have the Jerusalem Bible. The whole of the Jerusalem Bible is a paraphrasing of the Bible according to Christian preconceived notions. If you have it, I still need the quote because I don't remember to have ever read about Jesus himself declaring that he was from the line of David.

            Jesus could not have been from the line of David if he was not a biological son of Joseph who was the one from the Tribe of Judah. That was the biggest mistake committed by the gospel editor who lacked all knowledge of Jewish culture. He simply exonerated Jesus from being the Christian Messiah so desired by the Church.

            Comment


            • [QUOTE=Ben Masada;4302457][QUOTE=Charity;4300325]
              Originally posted by Ben Masada View Post

              It does not matter; I have the Jerusalem Bible. The whole of the Jerusalem Bible is a paraphrasing of the Bible according to Christian preconceived notions. If you have it, I still need the quote because I don't remember to have ever read about Jesus himself declaring that he was from the line of David.

              Jesus could not have been from the line of David if he was not a biological son of Joseph who was the one from the Tribe of Judah. That was the biggest mistake committed by the gospel editor who lacked all knowledge of Jewish culture. He simply exonerated Jesus from being the Christian Messiah so desired by the Church.

              Great detail went into Jesus's Visible DNA, THE Scrolls all came out of storage, an the whole town was turned upside down by two historical reports.

              Luk 3:31
              Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David


              I agree When did Jesus ever say he was the son of David? Harps & pipes

              I Must ask you, Where Did David ever say he was the son of Abraham?

              The celtic Nation were the Jewish Nieghbour's 1000 BC, Celtiberian, The Mary's, Josephs, Peters, Nicolas's. " Jesus"Harps&pipes, celt&jew, arab&jew, what was Solomon in trouble for? his foreign marriages an his children. Kings giving their Daughter to other kingdoms was like buying a loto ticket in inheriting an winning the kingdom.


              Thats when a full UNDERSATNDING of THE SEED OF TWO Jewish Nations helps.

              Jer 33:26
              Then will I cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.

              Who ever built a house for the Lord an destroyed the last, felt they had ended the covenant of the Last King of the Land.

              Its truly a mess, a web of conflict an betrayal.

              The Destruction of Jesus did not resemble any sacred ceremony, Im confident He would Have been Part Jewish, but the struggle for the throne an control between the two Jewish nations, seed, an servant, ended in the Roman empire dividing an conquering. The Land was broken as an earth quack into three..
              The Book of revelations is also more Achient than the new testament, which then makes it possible to change times an seasons from the original era, tricking the senses by using the book again, on the end of the new testament, creating a second judgement.
              Last edited by Charity; April 29th, 2015, 03:50 AM.

              Comment


              • [QUOTE=Charity;4302861][QUOTE=Ben Masada;4302457][QUOTE=Charity;4300325]

                Great detail went into Jesus's Visible DNA, THE Scrolls all came out of storage, an the whole town was turned upside down by two historical reports.
                It does not matter what happened. Jesus was a Jew and the NT could not use a Jew to teach against the Jewish culture.

                Luke 3:31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David.
                This has nothing to do with the genealogy of Jesus if Joseph was not his biological father.

                I agree When did Jesus ever say he was the son of David? Harps & pipes.
                Never if you are using the NT to speak about his genealogy.

                I Must ask you, Where Did David ever say he was the son of Abraham?
                In John 8:37. But it doesn't help. All Jews are of the seed of Abraham but not all are of the line of David.

                The celtic Nation were the Jewish Nieghbour's 1000 BC, Celtiberian, The Mary's, Josephs, Peters, Nicolas's. " Jesus"Harps&pipes, celt&jew, arab&jew, what was Solomon in trouble for? his foreign marriages an his children. Kings giving their Daughter to other kingdoms was like buying a loto ticket in inheriting an winning the kingdom.
                Women could not pass down the tribal genealogy of their children but only the Jewish identification. If Jesus was not a biological son of Joseph, he was a Jew but a Jew without a tribe in Israel.

                Thats when a full UNDERSATNDING of THE SEED OF TWO Jewish Nations helps.
                I don't think so.

                Jer 33:26 Then will I cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.
                Jer. 33:26 is a word of guarantee from the Lord that He would never reject the Jewish People as long as the natural laws that define the day from the night functioned properly. (Jer. 31:35-37) That's what Jer. 33:26 means.

                Who ever built a house for the Lord an destroyed the last, felt they had ended the covenant of the Last King of the Land. Its truly a mess, a web of conflict an betrayal.
                That was the intent in the case of insurrection or revolutions among the People.

                The Destruction of Jesus did not resemble any sacred ceremony, Im confident He would Have been Part Jewish, but the struggle for the throne an control between the two Jewish nations, seed, an servant, ended in the Roman empire dividing an conquering. The Land was broken as an earth quack into three..
                There were no three Jewish nations at the time of Jesus and, btw, never was. In fact, when Jesus was born there was only one Jewish nation. Rome divided nothing. The Romans just conquered what there was of a Jewish nation. When the Tribes split into two nations, Rome did not exist yet.

                The Book of revelations is also more Achient than the new testament, which then makes it possible to change times an seasons from the original era, tricking the senses by using the book again, on the end of the new testament creating a second judgement.
                The book of Revelation was written by several authors all within the second Century. Therefore, after the whole NT had been written. (Catholic preface to the book written by the Bishops' Committee of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine and inserted into the NAB a Catholic translation of the NT.

                Comment


                • So we agree, All Jews are the seed of Abraham, that left his law an land, saw a blazing fire ball shot across the sky, An said the Land he stood on would now be His an his seed to comes?

                  David is a servant, not a seed?

                  Rome's done well hiding it past - name change-Babylon that great has Fallen, everyone came out of Her, Babylon City- in the book of kings.
                  Here we Go, recored-Peter the friend of Jesus, the church that is Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you, An so dose Marcus my Son.
                  2Ki 17:24
                  ¶And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof.
                  And so it was at the beginning of their dwelling there, that they feared not the LORD: therefore the LORD sent lions among them, which slew some of them.
                  Wherefore they spake to the king of Assyria, saying, The nations which thou hast removed, and placed in the cities of Samaria, know not the manner of the God of the land: therefore he hath sent lions among them, and, behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the God of the land.
                  ¶Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.

                  Nation swaps - how they DIVIDED an conquered, an destroy pre existence with a new culture. An the book of revelation is a book between -500 BC an Jesus. the Long siience...

                  Comment


                  • [QUOTE=Charity;4304567]
                    So we agree, All Jews are the seed of Abraham, that left his law an land, saw a blazing fire ball shot across the sky, An said the Land he stood on would now be His an his seed to comes?
                    Right, we do. All Jews, aka the loyal ones to Judaism are the seed of Abraham. The Jews are the seed-to-come promised to Abraham. (Gen. 17:21)

                    David is a servant, not a seed?
                    No more. David is dead and God is the God of the living only.

                    Rome's done well hiding it past - name change-Babylon that great has Fallen, everyone came out of Her, Babylon City- in the book of kings.
                    And so has Rome fallen too. Only the seed of Abraham remains.

                    Here we Go, recored-Peter the friend of Jesus, the church that is Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you, An so dose Marcus my Son. (2Ki 17:24)
                    That's why the region at that time became known as the district of the Gentiles. (Isa. 9:1)

                    And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof.
                    And they became an annoying in the life of the Jews since then.

                    And so it was at the beginning of their dwelling there, that they feared not the LORD: therefore the LORD sent lions among them, which slew some of them.
                    That was the way the beloved Land of Israel found to react against the strange owners.

                    Wherefore they spake to the king of Assyria, saying, The nations which thou hast removed, and placed in the cities of Samaria, know not the manner of the God of the land: therefore he hath sent lions among them, and, behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the God of the land.
                    The Land of Israel did not welcome the people without a semblance of the lover. That's why the king of Assyria decided to send some of the Israelites to make life possible for the strangers in the Land.

                    Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.
                    That's true and that's why some of the Israelites were sent to it.

                    Nation swaps - how they DIVIDED an conquered, an destroy pre existence with a new culture. An the book of revelation is a book between -500 BC an Jesus. the Long siience...
                    About the book of Revelation, what I am aware of is that it was written by several authors already in the Second Century.

                    Comment


                    • Hi Ben, The book of relations was more than lightly edited in the second century, boy thats even close enough to finding the culprit if you wanted to try?

                      Abrahams from the east, the bibles all about his seed engaging the jewish blood. according to Abrahams seed with jewish blood in the veins, the Celtaberian seed-an jewish blood are pure pagan...
                      are you an arab-jew with a name like jesus, or a blue eyed celtic jew with a name like Mary, Joseph, peter?
                      According to the battle, paternal seed gains the throne AN the land according to Abraham, the man who left his birth land an birth Law, an made a covenant with his god by viewing a fire ball crossing the sky, that that land, Israel, would now be his seeds reward, even if it had another god, different morals, cities already built.
                      whats written about Abraham the foreigner has been made legal, clue of clues, with no regard to anyone that also occupied israel. hence, No mystery when king David was born to be forgotten, the intruders are still as rude today as back then, an still believe the whole place should bow to them as soon as they arrive an nothing before shall be worth remembering.
                      Last edited by Charity; May 14th, 2015, 03:50 AM.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Charity View Post

                        Rome's done well hiding it past - name change-Babylon that great has Fallen, everyone came out of Her, Babylon City- in the book of kings.
                        Here we Go, recored-Peter the friend of Jesus, the church that is Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you, An so dose Marcus my Son
                        it is a mystery
                        and
                        can be found no more
                        so
                        why does everyone know?
                        a voice crying in the wilderness :chrysost:

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by chrysostom View Post
                          it is a mystery
                          and
                          can be found no more
                          so
                          why does everyone know?
                          Hi Chrys,

                          The front brain must ask the back brain what it thinks, marshall religion divided perceptive thinking enforcing a Law to compulsory belief. resulting in deaf an blindness.
                          If we could only know who ended up with all the looted books, and 50 ton of looted jewish Gold, an hide it away form the first century to 500 BC THEN we might kick start the Brain to brake the law that sayeth follow the Law an find freedom.
                          An to understand the theory of those with power to create problems an power to be able to arrive as the hero.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Charity View Post
                            1- Hi Ben, The book of relations was more than lightly edited in the second century, boy thats even close enough to finding the culprit if you wanted to try?

                            2 - Abrahams from the east, the bibles all about his seed engaging the jewish blood. according to Abrahams seed with jewish blood in the veins, the Celtaberian seed-an jewish blood are pure pagan...
                            are you an arab-jew with a name like jesus, or a blue eyed celtic jew with a name like Mary, Joseph, peter?

                            3 - According to the battle, paternal seed gains the throne AN the land according to Abraham, the man who left his birth land an birth Law, an made a covenant with his god by viewing a fire ball crossing the sky, that that land, Israel, would now be his seeds reward, even if it had another god, different morals, cities already built.

                            4 - whats written about Abraham the foreigner has been made legal, clue of clues, with no regard to anyone that also occupied israel. hence, No mystery when king David was born to be forgotten, the intruders are still as rude today as back then, an still believe the whole place should bow to them as soon as they arrive an nothing before shall be worth remembering.
                            1 - Maybe but I am not interested. I have enough from the Catholic Bishop in the NAB who wrote in the preface to the book of Revelation that the book was written by several unknown authors, probably the persons responsible for the forth gospel. And that it was written at the end of the First Century.

                            2 - Neither of one nor of the other ethnicity. I am a Sephardic Jew. The greater percentage of Jews in Israel is of the Sephardic orientation.

                            3 - The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was not "a god of his" as you joke about. He is the Primal Cause who caused the universe to exist. If you have any doubt about it, I am sure I can help you.

                            4 - I think you have never read the Tanach, especially Torah aka the Pentateuch because what and how you speak of our beginnings is too rudimentary and more akin to satiric literature.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Ben Masada View Post
                              1 - Maybe but I am not interested. I have enough from the Catholic Bishop in the NAB who wrote in the preface to the book of Revelation that the book was written by several unknown authors, probably the persons responsible for the forth gospel. And that it was written at the end of the First Century.

                              2 - Neither of one nor of the other ethnicity. I am a Sephardic Jew. The greater percentage of Jews in Israel is of the Sephardic orientation.

                              3 - The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was not "a god of his" as you joke about. He is the Primal Cause who caused the universe to exist. If you have any doubt about it, I am sure I can help you.

                              4 - I think you have never read the Tanach, especially Torah aka the Pentateuch because what and how you speak of our beginnings is too rudimentary and more akin to satiric literature.
                              HI Ben, would you say we have a problem with nations that believe their god created the universe an that gives them authority to rule over other nations?
                              I believe the early scientists, having observed the universe,recored their work only for their names to be earased by looters, who in turn gave their god all the glory for a 7 day knowledge, an failed to tell the truth about where they obtained the infomation.
                              The oldest known Calendar is a Lunar Calendar in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, which was constructed around 8,000 BCE.
                              The Julian calendar, introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 BC (708 AUC), was a reform of the Roman calendar. It took effect in 45 BC (709 AUC), shortly after the Roman conquest of Egypt. It was the predominant calendar in the Roman world, most of Europe, and in European settlements in the Americas and elsewhere, until it was refined and gradually replaced by the Gregorian calendar, promulgated in 1582 by Pope Gregory XIII.
                              Religion must maintain its lie. an is very furious when it come to science.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Ben Masada View Post
                                1 - Maybe but I am not interested. I have enough from the Catholic Bishop in the NAB who wrote in the preface to the book of Revelation that the book was written by several unknown authors, probably the persons responsible for the forth gospel. And that it was written at the end of the First Century.

                                2 - Neither of one nor of the other ethnicity. I am a Sephardic Jew. The greater percentage of Jews in Israel is of the Sephardic orientation.

                                3 - The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was not "a god of his" as you joke about. He is the Primal Cause who caused the universe to exist. If you have any doubt about it, I am sure I can help you.

                                4 - I think you have never read the Tanach, especially Torah aka the Pentateuch because what and how you speak of our beginnings is too rudimentary and more akin to satiric literature.
                                I spose so too.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X