Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some Thoughts On The Religion Of Evolution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some Thoughts On The Religion Of Evolution

    JAGG Writes:
    Some Thoughts On The Religion Of Evolution , , ,


    Some talk about Abiogenesis {life came from non-life}

    Most Evolutionists today do NOT make a case
    for Abiogenesis, but some Thread-Evolutionists
    have argued for the possibility. To me its an
    absurd notion. Life cannot come from non-life.

    Most Evolutionists these days go with the word
    Evolution and hawk "Natural Selection"
    and "Random mutation" , , ,

    My view is that it does not matter what you
    call it -- the fact remains that , ,

    Evolutionists claim that , , ,

    ~ natural selection
    and
    ~ :random mutation
    and
    ~ atoms and molecules
    and
    ~ chemical reactions
    and
    ~ etc etc etc

    plus
    unthinking non-intelligent Time
    plus
    unthinking non-intelligent Chance
    plus
    unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,

    , , eventually produced a situation where our ancestors crawled
    up out of the Primordial Slime or Primordial Soup, at first just a
    tiny speck, later to become the size of a dime, later to become the
    size of a golf ball, later to become a Bullfrog or Whatever They Say It Was
    later to become a Monkey or a Chimp, later to become a "George W. Bush."

    ____________


    Moreover, , , Evolutionists believe that , , ,


    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Time
    plus
    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Chance
    plus
    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,

    . . . produced a , , ,

    ■ highly complex Human Brain
    and
    ■ a highly complex Human Eye
    and
    ■ a highly complex Fully Functioning Human Body
    and
    ■ a highly complex Earth
    and
    ■ a highly complex Universe.
    and eventually produced a , , ,
    ■ highly complex "George W. Bush"

    _____________


    It takes a lot of Faith to believe all that up there.
    And my view is that anybody who believes all that
    up there is a Great Man Of Faith -- this is why I
    speak about the Religion Of Evolution.

    Speaking about Faith , ,

    Theistic Evolution may be the way it happened.
    My view is that it has NOT been scientifically proved
    that the one-celled speck in the Primordial Slime eventually
    became "Oprah Winfrey" and "Joe Biden" , ,

    , , but, , ,

    , , Evolution is not a crucial issue for the Christian anyway.

    Millions of us say Evolutionists have NOT scientifically proved
    that "George W. Bush" started off as a single-celled speck that
    "came up out of the Slime" -- but even if they do, one day, prove
    that it happened that way, So what? Who cares?

    We Christians will forever believe in the God that created the highly
    complex Human Person, the highly complex Human Brain, the highly
    complex Human Eye, the highly complex Earth, the highly complex
    Universe, and all that exists --- how He did it, is interesting but it has
    zero to do with our Faith in God , ,,

    , , , repeat , , ,

    how He did it, is interesting but it has zero to do with
    our Faith in God , ,,


    "Have Faith in God."___The Lord Jesus {Mark 11:22}

    JAGG


  • #2
    "As for the evolutionary path responsible for "a Ronald Reagan"
    or "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg" our DNA already can be decoded
    to provide a general idea of our ancestry, our common genetic
    relations, and that of a common primordial ancestor,
    simply
    because we follow the identical pattern of blueprint
    common
    to that of all thus far known life. In this regard,
    there is
    empirical evidence consistent with understanding
    of our
    genetic origins." ___off the Web

    JAG Replies:

    You have no Empirical Evidence that your original ancestor

    was at one time a dead one-celled speck that lived in the
    Primordial Slime and then later begin to pulsate with life
    and eventually became "a Ronald Reagan" and "a Ruth
    Bader Ginsburg."



    Pulsate , , just a slight boom , , boom , , boom , , ,


    I mean the one-celled speck was not always alive --so there
    was a time when Old One-Cell was as dead as a door nail , ,


    , , , but , , , ,


    , , lo and behold , , ,


    , , ,Old One Cell at some point became alive and it began to pulsate.

    Then Time Passed.


    After awhile Old One Cell, increased to the size of a pecan.


    Then later on Old One Cell increased to the size of a baseball.


    Then to the size of a Chicken.


    A chicken , , ,


    Then later on as Time Passed Old One Cell has now become a Toad Frog.
    {or What Ever You Claim It Became}


    But Old One Cell did not remain a Toad Frog.


    On no.


    Old One Cell eventually became a Chimp.


    Then as time Passed a "scientific miracle" occurred , , ,


    Here it comes , , ,


    Old One Cell now at last as become "a Ronald Reagan"
    and "a Ruth Bader Ginsburg."


    And all that up there happened due to , , ,


    ~ natural selection

    and

    ~ :random mutation

    and

    ~ atoms and molecules wiggling around

    and

    ~ chemical reactions taking place . . .


    , , , and all that was produced by


    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Time

    plus

    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Chance

    plus

    ~ unthinking non-intelligent Matter , , ,


    , , which produced a , ,


    ~ highly complex Human Brain


    ~ and a highly complex Human Eye, and


    ~ a highly complex Fully Functioning Human Body


    So?


    So if you believe all that up there, then you are a Great Man Of Faith
    and you believe in the Religion Of Evolution.


    My view is >> It requires MORE faith to believe in all that up there, than
    it requires to believe in John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that He
    gave His one and only Son that whoever believes in Him shall not perish
    but have Eternal Life."


    Best.


    JAG


    Comment


    • #3
      There is still a "missing link." Also no one can explain the evolution of a single cell and all its parts.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Bradley D View Post

        There is still a "missing link." Also no one can
        explain the evolution of a single cell and all its
        parts.

        Agreed.

        By the way, the OP is AGAINST Evolution, not For Evolution.

        JAG


        Comment

        Working...
        X