Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sandyhook still unanswered Questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ok doser View Post
    a third of the way in you identify a "Halbig" - a quick google search shows "Wolfgang Halbig", who is, apparently, an insignificant nobody who has been magnified by the attention given him by people like anna and barbie
    You perhaps meant to say "THall", who trotted out Halbig's stupid fantasies and suggested that they posed important questions. (perhaps he didn't intend to make it look as though they were his own) I just showed that they had been thoroughly debunked.

    maybe you guys should stop doing that
    Not when it's that easy to deflate someone's whacked-out conspiracy stories.

    Anna posed an important question:
    can you understand why people (especially morons) might believe this?
    Who, after seeing that debunking, will take it seriously?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
      You perhaps meant to say "THall" ...
      nope, i meant what i said - it's people like you and anna who breathe life into this nonsense



      and it's people like THall who troll for people like you and anna, and you guys take the bait every single time

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ok doser View Post
        nope, i meant what i said - it's people like you and anna who breathe life into this nonsense
        As I said, after reading that debunking, who would give it any credibility at all? You're annoyed that it got shot down so easily. Don't worry, you'll find something else; there's a lot of it out there.

        and it's people like THall who troll for people like you and anna,
        I think you're projecting a little here. THall is maybe too willing to believe some things, but I think you're wrong to suggest that he's dishonest.

        It was a perfectly good conspiracy theory, taken down by a pack of ugly little facts. Let it go, and find another one.

        There's plenty of them out there for you.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
          ... You're annoyed that it got shot down so easily....
          back to your old tricks again?

          perhaps it's time you had another time-out

          Comment


          • #20
            bump for [MENTION=10029]annabenedetti[/MENTION]
            Originally posted by ok doser View Post
            can you understand why people (especially morons) might believe this (that Sandy Hook was staged to give government officials the justification to ban guns)?

            are you familiar with the NYS-SAFE ACT, that my scumbag governor rammed through the legislature literally in the middle of the night, without public debate, in response to Sandy Hook?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by ok doser View Post
              back to your old tricks again?

              perhaps it's time you had another time-out
              We don't seem to be able to have a conversation without you getting upset. So you're getting an ignore for a few weeks. Maybe you should do that for me, too. Might be good for your blood pressure.

              Bye, now.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                Bye, now.
                Bye.
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Forgot about you. You're out of sight for a while, too...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                    You're out of sight for a while, too...


                    I've never been so "upset" in my whole life.
                    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                    E≈mc2
                    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                    -Bob B.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I can't begin to describe how upset I am

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X