Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Class Action Suit Starting up against Govt Canada over forced Prisoner Vaccines

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Class Action Suit Starting up against Govt Canada over forced Prisoner Vaccines

    This will be an easy win for lawyers using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
    and just about every prisoner will sign onto this,
    because of the long history of abuse of prisoners in medical experiments
    excused by such programs.

    Currently Canadian prisons inject all detainees with a "TB Vaccine" which
    neither inoculates against TB, nor does it detect the presence of TB,
    even though this is the 'official' reason for the inoculations.

    Furthermore, the medical practitioners (nurses) who do the injections
    have no idea of what is even in the vaccine dosages,
    including dangerous and harmful additives like mercury and acidic
    chemicals to 'enhance' the body's reaction to microbes.

    The nurses questioned recently had no idea even whether the 'virus'
    in the injections was 'live' or dead.

    This brutal operation is insisted upon by nurses and guards,
    even though it violates at least four statutes in the Canadian Criminal Code,
    as well as the universal Medical Code of Ethics, which begins
    with the concept of "Do no harm".

    As the site says:



    This action by the government constitutes an extreme violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    It also violates the Criminal Code of Canada, including, but not limited to,
    the following:

    (1) Forced medical treatment without consent. A violation of basic rights and freedoms. The right to refusal of medical treatment is a natural and international right, recognized for all human beings.

    (2) The administering of a noxious substance. Vaccines contain a variety of poisonous, harmful, and noxious substances, including carriers and non-medicinal ingredients that are of dubious value but are known to be harmful biological agents.

    (3) Assault, and assault bodily harm. The forced injection of harmful chemical agents is a form of assault, which can result in horrific medical illnesses and complications.

    (4) Assault with a weapon, aggravated assault. The needle used, and the forced confinement often used, is in fact assault with a weapon. If for instance, any ordinary citizen stabbed a police officer or government employee with a needle containing ambiguous substances, that citizen would be instantly charged with assault with a weapon, and the basic question of assault with a weapon would not be in dispute.

    (5) Cruel and Unusual Punishment. The emotional and psychological stress caused by forced injections on unwilling and uninformed detainees constitutes a violation of both the Charter of Rights and international law.

    (6) The provision of a means or system to harm inmates. This system can be abused and has been already abused in a number of ways, including the injection of harmful substances without the knowledge of inmates or even medical practitioners. It constitutes the creation of a second 'tier' system of punishment upon inmates not authorized by either the Criminal Code or the Charter of Rights.

    http://noprisonvaccinations.blogspot.ca/


    Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
    Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
    It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
    The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
    until He has done it, And until He has performed
    the intents of His heart.
    In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



    sigpic

  • #2
    Here's some more general information on vaccines:



    Vaccine Information
    Vaccination: Basic Concerns

    Revelation 18:23 ...for by Mystery Babylon's sorceries (pharmakeia) were all nations deceived.
    The medical establishment considers vaccines effective if they suppress a few targeted illnesses – but at what cost? An emerging body of evidence indicates that vaccines can damage a child’s developing brain and immune system, leading to neurodevelopmental disorders, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, anaphylactic food allergies, diabetes and autoimmune disorders. As well, vaccines have been linked to sudden, unexpected death in infancy and early childhood (SIDS).
    Real Truth Behind Vaccines - Full HD Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M93CkKV6Mdw
    http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-
    Arguments for and against https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
    http://thinktwice.com/faq.htm


    The Central Mechanism By Which Vaccines Induce Autism - Dr. Russell Blaylock Lecture https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
    Dr Russell Blaylock - Nutrition and the Illuminati Agenda
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
    http://www.vaccinationcouncil.
    CANADA
    http://vaccinechoicecanada.
    The International Medical Council on Vaccination is an association of medical doctors, registered nurses and other qualified medical professionals whose purpose is to counter the messages asserted by pharmaceutical companies, the government and medical agencies that vaccines are safe, effective and harmless.

    Principles and Findings

    • We are profoundly critical of the practice of vaccination. Vaccination is an unacceptable risk to every member of society, regardless of age.
    • As medical professionals, Council members have observed first-hand the health of vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated. We find the latter group to be robust, healthy and drug-free compared to the former group.
    • We have reviewed published studies in support of vaccines and have found them wanting in both substance and science.
    • We have brought out into the open hundreds of peer-reviewed, published medical articles that document the damage and the diseases caused by vaccines.
    • We find the premise of herd immunity to be a faulty theory.
    • We encourage intelligent debate about vaccination.
    • We expect individuals to take responsibility for their health and the health of their children by investigating the problems due to vaccination prior to subjecting their children, or themselves, to this medical procedure.
    • We believe that refusing vaccination is a personal right that should be legislatively guaranteed.

    http://www.drcarley.com/
    Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines Movie dire
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    RESEARCH AND RESOURCES
    http://vaccinechoicecanada.HERD IMMUNITY IS NOT LOGICAL https://www.youtube.com/watch?


    Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
    Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
    It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
    The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
    until He has done it, And until He has performed
    the intents of His heart.
    In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      Position of the American Medical Association:



      American Medical Association opposes mandatory vaccines: medical ethics statement

      Tuesday, February 10, 2015
      by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
      Tags: mandatory vaccines, code of ethics, American Medical Association




      (NaturalNews) According to the "Informed Consent" section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics posted at the American Medical Association website, the AMA is fundamentally and unambiguously opposed to mandatory vaccine programs in America. Read the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics statement here.

      A mandatory vaccination policy -- forced vaccination of unwilling recipients -- is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the consent of the patient or the patient's parents. This directly violates the very clear language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:

      The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment... Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent.

      "Physicians must honor" informed consent


      The AMA's Code of Medical Ethics statement is very clear: "physicians must honor" the policy of informed consent. In fact, the AMA describes this as "a basic policy in both ethics and law" and only makes exception if the patient "is unconscious" or if harm from failure to treat "is imminent."

      Mandatory vaccine interventions are conducted in total violation of this code of ethics. Most unvaccinated children are in a state of perfect health, with no symptoms and no active disease. There is no "imminent" risk of harm from "failure to treat."

      Because the mainstream media is desperately trying to confuse the public about the very definition of "medical consent," here is the Dictionary.com definition of "consent":

      verb - to permit, approve, or agree; comply or yield (often followed by to or an infinitive)
      He consented to the proposal. We asked her permission, and she consented.

      Patients deserve an "informed choice"

      The AMA's Code of Ethics statement furthermore says that patients possess a "right of self-decision" and that this right can only be effectively exercised "if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice."

      Nearly all vaccinations are carried out in direct violation of this medical code of ethics because patients are almost never handed vaccine insert sheets, and the very real risks of vaccination are almost never explained to anyone. In fact, virtually the entire medical establishment operates in a state of total denial that any vaccine risks exist at all. This, too, is a striking violation of the AMA's code of ethics.

      It is also an outright abandonment of all logic and medical reality, as every medical intervention comes with some level of risk, even if that risk is small. It is not zero, as is routinely and repeatedly claimed by vaccine fanatics.

      Doctors should "respectfully" explain treatment options to patients

      The AMA's Code of Ethics further states "Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients."

      Instead, what we actually see in America today is:

      • Belligerent doctors verbally berating patients for asking intelligent, informed questions about vaccine ingredients and vaccine side effects.

      • Arrogant doctors threatening to cut off all medical treatment from patients unless they agree to a coerced medical intervention (vaccinations).

      • Doctors and hospitals calling law enforcement authorities on families, then staging the state seizure of children while threatening parents with arrest and imprisonment (medical kidnapping).

      These actions are so far removed from the AMA's Code of Ethics that they call into question the very real question of whether the entire medical system has utterly abandoned any shred of medical ethics at all.

      A campaign of intellectual bigotry carried out in the name of science

      Today, medical obedience to mandatory vaccines is being aggressively demanded by rage-filled doctors, health authorities and media outlets. A vicious campaign of intellectual bigotry has been unleashed against all vaccine skeptics, with malicious tactics such as equating skeptical thinkers who seek to avoid mercury with people who still think the Earth is flat.

      There is no question that such malicious tactics against concerned moms are being conducted in total violation of the AMA's own Code of Ethics, which also states that "The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice."

      This code of medical ethics means doctors may educate patients and even respectfully urge them to follow a particular course of action, but they may not coerce, threaten, intimidate or otherwise verbally berate patients who disagree with their suggested course of action.

      Here's the full statement from the AMA's Code of Ethics page, section 8.08 - Informed Consent:

      The patient's right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent. In special circumstances, it may be appropriate to postpone disclosure of information, (see Opinion E-8.122, "Withholding Information from Patients").

      Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients. The quantity and specificity of this information should be tailored to meet the preferences and needs of individual patients. Physicians need not communicate all information at one time, but should assess the amount of information that patients are capable of receiving at a given time and present the remainder when appropriate. (I, II, V, VIII)


      Because we believe the AMA will, after seeing this investigative story, attempt to alter or revoke this medical ethics document, we are also posting a screen shot of the AMA's page sourced on February 9, 2015:




      Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
      Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
      It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
      The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
      until He has done it, And until He has performed
      the intents of His heart.
      In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



      sigpic

      Comment


      • #4
        Nuremberg Code and Modern Medical Ethics:





        'The Nuremberg Code was delivered in 1947 as part of the verdict against Nazi doctors who had conducted horrific medical experiments on Jews and other prisoners and remains one of the foundations of medical ethics with respect to human subjects research. Some of the ten points of the code include the requirement for informed consent, the requirement that there be strong preclinical data (in vitro and animal experiments) to support the hypothesis being tested, that physical and mental suffering must be avoided or minimized, and several other principles that we accept today.'

        a passage from an article entitled Have Rabbis Forgotten The Experiments on Jewish Women at Auschwitz?:
        Needless to say, giving untested, unknown vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates the core principles of the Nuremberg – informed and unambiguous consent. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed “emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental status to legally consent.“Informed,” as well, is hollowed of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false or frightening “information.”


        Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
        Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
        It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
        The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
        until He has done it, And until He has performed
        the intents of His heart.
        In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          Class Action Suit Starting up against Govt Canada over forced Prisoner Vaccines

          Conversely, the government could also be subject to a class action suit by inmates who contacted TB or any other cantageous disease while they were in prison.

          One solution might be to place all prisoners in solitary confinement for the duration of their sentence, but that would also give rise to its own set of lawsuits.

          I suspect that one of the conditions for being employed in the prisons is a TB vaccination.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jgarden View Post
            Class Action Suit Starting up against Govt Canada over forced Prisoner Vaccines

            Conversely, the government could also be subject to a class action suit by inmates who contacted TB or any other cantageous disease while they were in prison.

            One solution might be to place all prisoners in solitary confinement for the duration of their sentence, but that would also give rise to its own set of lawsuits.

            I suspect that one of the conditions for being employed in the prisons is a TB vaccination.
            Yes, guards and other professionals should also sue over ininformed consent and forced vaccination.

            Nurses and doctors, and paramedics know about the risks, and most try to avoid getting vaccinated, and have their unions fight for their right to exemption. Prisoners have no union, and are not even informed of the risks, or consequences of forced vaccination.

            Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
            Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
            It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
            The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
            until He has done it, And until He has performed
            the intents of His heart.
            In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Nazaroo View Post
              Yes, guards and other professionals should also sue over ininformed consent and forced vaccination.

              Nurses and doctors, and paramedics know about the risks, and most try to avoid getting vaccinated, and have their unions fight for their right to exemption. Prisoners have no union, and are not even informed of the risks, or consequences of forced vaccination.
              Prison inmates don't have a reputation for being one of the more health conscious segments of society - if I was a guard or an inmate, I'd opt for the shot.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jgarden View Post
                Prison inmates don't have a reputation for being one of the more health conscious segments of society - if I was a guard or an inmate, I'd opt for the shot.
                The TB 'shot' doesn't immunize against TB.

                It is supposed to 'detect' it by stimulating the production of antibodies
                previously created by the virus in an already infected person.

                However it does neither, but the prison population does provide
                a handy uninformed unconsenting population so that
                drug corporations can sell millions of vaccines and have them used,
                without anyone taking note of the profits they are gouging out of bad science.

                Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
                Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
                It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
                The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
                until He has done it, And until He has performed
                the intents of His heart.
                In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9


                  IN fact, many subsequent councils have advanced medical ethics, codes and guidelines.

                  Informed Consent for instance has been fleshed out in the following way in university research environments:

                  'Adults are assumed to be competent unless demonstrated otherwise. Potential subjects should be adequately informed of the aims, methods, benefits, hazards and any discomfort. Documentation given to potential subjects should be comprehensible. Consent should normally be in writing and records kept. Potential subjects are free to withdraw without implication. All subjects should be volunteers, decisions not to participate should not prejudice the subject in any way.'

                  One can see how far away the practice inside Canadian prisons is from what is internationally considered acceptable ethical standards.
                  Prisoners are not adequately informed of the aims, benefits (none), hazards (many), and discomfort (and the intent of informing someone of discomfort is to help assist them in making a decision to consent!). Consent is not in writing, and no records are kept. Subjects are NOT free to withdraw without implications or prejudice to their situation. Instead they are routinely threatened when they object to imposed medical procedures including forced vaccinations.


                  Vaccines typically contain many harmful agents, making them effectively a 'noxious substance' and that means that administering such vaccines is a criminal offence.

                  Vaccines also includes aluminum, sodium chloride, L-histidine, polysorbate 80, water, and sodium borate – boric acid – (poison)! Boric acid, an insecticide and anti-fungal, is banned in the United States as a food additive. It is toxic to all cells. The negative effects of aluminum and other heavy metals are widely reported.

                  Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
                  Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
                  It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
                  The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
                  until He has done it, And until He has performed
                  the intents of His heart.
                  In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Nazaroo View Post
                    Yes, guards and other professionals should also sue over ininformed consent and forced vaccination.

                    Nurses and doctors, and paramedics know about the risks, and most try to avoid getting vaccinated, and have their unions fight for their right to exemption. Prisoners have no union, and are not even informed of the risks, or consequences of forced vaccination.
                    Nazaroo, there has been much discussion about making laws to inject U.S. prisoners about ten years ago. Nothing that really took off. But this issue you bought to our attention may reignite the U.S. idea.

                    There was considerable and valid sites ten years ago regarding this, but I could only find a small mention of it now.

                    WASHINGTON (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
                    said Thursday that it was about to begin testing a new technology
                    designed to help more closely monitor and assist the nation's
                    homeless population.Under the pilot program, which grew out of a
                    series of policy academies held in the last two years, homeless
                    people in participating cities will be implanted with mandatory Radio
                    Frequency Identification (RFID) tags that social workers and police
                    can use track their movements.

                    http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64828

                    However India is really making progress in this area. No microchips. They use all ten finger prints and Iris scans to identify people. So far almost a BILLION people.

                    http://www.economist.com/news/specia...aying-leapfrog

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by rougueone View Post
                      Nazaroo, there has been much discussion about making laws to inject U.S. prisoners about ten years ago. Nothing that really took off. But this issue you bought to our attention may reignite the U.S. idea.

                      There was considerable and valid sites ten years ago regarding this, but I could only find a small mention of it now.

                      WASHINGTON (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
                      said Thursday that it was about to begin testing a new technology
                      designed to help more closely monitor and assist the nation's
                      homeless population.Under the pilot program, which grew out of a
                      series of policy academies held in the last two years, homeless
                      people in participating cities will be implanted with mandatory Radio
                      Frequency Identification (RFID) tags that social workers and police
                      can use track their movements.

                      http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64828

                      However India is really making progress in this area. No microchips. They use all ten finger prints and Iris scans to identify people. So far almost a BILLION people.

                      http://www.economist.com/news/specia...aying-leapfrog
                      Thanks for your post!

                      I'll pass these links on to others

                      Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord
                      Goes forth with fury, A continuing whirlwind;
                      It will fall violently on the head of the wicked.
                      The fierce anger of the Lord will not return
                      until He has done it, And until He has performed
                      the intents of His heart.
                      In the final days you will consider it. - Jer. 30:23-24



                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X