Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Y does Pres O seem to care about soldiers but no/1 else?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Y does Pres O seem to care about soldiers but no/1 else?

    The pres never wants to do boots on the ground in the middle east even when it is highly indicated..

    Well, he finally sent some Americans into Syria on a mission. Not one American was lost

    amazing. An important terrorist was killed, the one who had control over the $$ matters of the savages (ISIS)

    Great..

    But i just wonder why he doesn't seem to care about the citizens over in the middle east who are running from ISIS, some not making i t... being killed by the hundreds.

    If we were to do this war the way the generals and others want to do it.. we could save so many lives..

    It seems he doesn't want soldiers to die (very good idea) but he doesn't care about others' lives... (the unborn also).

    I guess he wants the Ds to get the military vote?

    well, a lot of military (and ordinary people like me) WANT to go over there and kick ISIS into the 7th century where they belong--No, wait, they don't belong anywhere on Planet Earth

    just don't get it... except

    politics


    that explains the inexplicable...

    http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/20...sis-on-ground/

    We should ARM not only the Kurds and the Iraqi fighters but EVERYONE over theere..
    Why is life so cheap?

    very sad


    +


    ___

  • #2
    Col 3:2 (KJV)
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    You're too literal to get it.
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by republicanchick View Post
      The pres never wants to do boots on the ground in the middle east even when it is highly indicated..

      Well, he finally sent some Americans into Syria on a mission. Not one American was lost

      amazing. An important terrorist was killed...
      US looking into whether American hostage Kayla Mueller was kept for a time by ISIS leader
      Last edited by serpentdove; May 21st, 2015, 01:06 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        You can't go to war every time innocent people die in a conflict overseas. Do you know how many wars you'd be in. We've tried wars to fix the middle east. Didn't work. Arming people in the middle east has been the worst foreign policy disaster of them all! Maybe we should just let the people in the middle east decide their own fate. Maybe they'll decide they don't want a theocracy in the end. You can't force people to be civilized. They have to want it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by TrakeM View Post
          You can't go to war every time innocent people die in a conflict overseas. Do you know how many wars you'd be in. We've tried wars to fix the middle east. Didn't work. Arming people in the middle east has been the worst foreign policy disaster of them all! Maybe we should just let the people in the middle east decide their own fate. Maybe they'll decide they don't want a theocracy in the end. You can't force people to be civilized. They have to want it.
          how callous

          just like a lib: let them all die. Who cares? It doesn't concern the US

          God's Word says to save those destined for death

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by TrakeM View Post
            You can't go to war every time innocent people die in a conflict overseas. Do you know how many wars you'd be in. We've tried wars to fix the middle east. Didn't work...
            Too bad sat images didn't pick up this this ISIS parade. Eccl 3:8

            "Too bad." ~ Seth Brundle, The Fly

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by republicanchick View Post
              how callous

              just like a lib: let them all die. Who cares? It doesn't concern the US...
              We gave them a chance.

              Comment


              • #8
                When you go to war, you go to win.

                Comment


                • #9
                  this war strategy (so called) of the Admin

                  is just show... the bombings are not effective b/c no boots on the ground to direct where to bomb.. just a show.. b/c Pres O and the Admin need to show they are doing something...

                  Well, I sometimes wonder if this something is worse than nothing

                  either fight a war to win or why fight? Why have all those lost lives when you do not plan on allowing the military to WIN?

                  I say every country in the "coalition" should contribute forces. Then we obliterate the psychocaliphate and anyone thinking of getting it going again would remember..


                  +++

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As with bin Laden, it takes some time, but we will get them, one at a time.

                    It's starting to dawn on them. Lots of ways to get them, and we're getting better and better at it, since Obama decided that Bush's defensive policy wasn't working.
                    This message is hidden because ...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by republicanchick View Post
                      The pres never wants to do boots on the ground in the middle east even when it is highly indicated..

                      Well, he finally sent some Americans into Syria on a mission. Not one American was lost

                      amazing. An important terrorist was killed, the one who had control over the $$ matters of the savages (ISIS)

                      Great..

                      But i just wonder why he doesn't seem to care about the citizens over in the middle east who are running from ISIS, some not making i t... being killed by the hundreds.

                      If we were to do this war the way the generals and others want to do it.. we could save so many lives..

                      It seems he doesn't want soldiers to die (very good idea) but he doesn't care about others' lives... (the unborn also).

                      I guess he wants the Ds to get the military vote?

                      well, a lot of military (and ordinary people like me) WANT to go over there and kick ISIS into the 7th century where they belong--No, wait, they don't belong anywhere on Planet Earth

                      just don't get it... except

                      politics


                      that explains the inexplicable...

                      http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/20...sis-on-ground/

                      We should ARM not only the Kurds and the Iraqi fighters but EVERYONE over theere..
                      Why is life so cheap?

                      very sad


                      +


                      ___
                      He wants to change the international perception of the US as a country that meddles in things that aren't its problem, which is sometimes to the detriment of where the meddling occurs. And he's right that we have often been overzealous in our desire to be world police. However, he incorrectly assumed for way too long that ISIS would burn itself out and never be of any real concern to anyone outside of Iraq.

                      I think sending in a large ground force is a bad idea. The people there hate America for intrusively inserting itself into their daily lives enough already, and that hatred helps to fuel radicalization of new terrorist candidates. We should only deploy SEALs and other specialized combat units that can perform specific operations without actually occupying the area, and we should continue to train and support Iraqi resistance to ISIS.

                      Perhaps we can be doing a bit more, but we also need to keep our footprint small after the whole Iraq fiasco that indirectly led to ISIS's rise by creating a vacuum of power in the region. What Obama needs to do more than anything else is to call these guys what they are: the enemy. He needs to quit pretending like they aren't a problem and strongly come out against them, and perhaps in doing that he will command more respect from the Saudis and other Middle Eastern allies, which will make them more likely to commit more to fighting ISIS than they currently are (excluding Jordan, which has been doing more than its fair share)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by The Barbarian View Post
                        As with bin Laden, it takes some time, but we will get them, one at a time.

                        It's starting to dawn on them. Lots of ways to get them, and we're getting better and better at it, since Obama decided that Bush's defensive policy wasn't working.
                        you sound like a robot invented by the libs to spoutate all their talking points so their mouths could take a break



                        +++

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Kdall View Post
                          He

                          I think sending in a large ground force is a bad idea. The people there hate America for intrusively inserting itself into their daily lives enough already, and that hatred helps to fuel radicalization of new terrorist candidates. are)
                          i read this far. And this is ridiculous

                          They do NOT want ISIS there and even if they hate America (NOT true but even if they did) they hate ISIS more

                          geez...


                          ___

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X