Canadian discusses biased fact-checkers

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
You don't seem to be able to discern between fact and biased fiction already. You're already entrenched it would seem and that's the problem. I'm left of centre, politically but I'm cynical where it comes to politics and don't lap up anything that's spewed out by any media source on face value. Can you understand that?
 

Hilltrot

Well-known member
You don't seem to be able to discern between fact and biased fiction already. You're already entrenched it would seem and that's the problem. I'm left of centre, politically but I'm cynical where it comes to politics and don't lap up anything that's spewed out by any media source on face value. Can you understand that?

So, you admit to being a troll. Just not that far left.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
You don't seem to be able to discern between fact and biased fiction already. You're already entrenched it would seem and that's the problem. I'm left of centre, politically but I'm cynical where it comes to politics and don't lap up anything that's spewed out by any media source on face value. Can you understand that?

The thing this guy doesn't get, is that the time to be really skeptical, is when someone tells you things you really want to believe. Hence fact-checkers (or their critics) who don't cite data to support their determinations are not good sources.

This is why the You Tuber didn't include any data for comparison. A simple check for this would be to pick out a number of prominent fact-checkers, and analyze how many of their determinations could be validated compared to the number that could not be validated. Alternately, one could just talk louder and accuse them all of "spinning."

One of those is more sensible than the other.

https://www.kare11.com/article/news...iden/507-985d7570-1155-4424-9c85-6599db02d50e

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/fact-check-trump-biden-final-presidential-debate/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...ing-the-final-trump-biden-presidential-debate

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/22/us/fact-check-debate-trump-biden
 

Hilltrot

Well-known member
The thing this guy doesn't get, is that the time to be really skeptical, is when someone tells you things you really want to believe. Hence fact-checkers (or their critics) who don't cite data to support their determinations are not good sources.

This is why the You Tuber didn't include any data for comparison. A simple check for this would be to pick out a number of prominent fact-checkers, and analyze how many of their determinations could be validated compared to the number that could not be validated. Alternately, one could just talk louder and accuse them all of "spinning."

One of those is more sensible than the other.

https://www.kare11.com/article/news...iden/507-985d7570-1155-4424-9c85-6599db02d50e

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/fact-check-trump-biden-final-presidential-debate/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...ing-the-final-trump-biden-presidential-debate

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/22/us/fact-check-debate-trump-biden

It's obvious that The Barbarian, slayer of babies, isn't even responding to what the video said. I'll use his leftist logic and assume it's because he's racist against French Canadians.
 

Hilltrot

Well-known member
You've confused me with Donald Trump, who paid his girlfriend to kill his unborn child:
https://friedmanoftheplains.com/dona...n-1c4ae9832770

It's why you support him, remember?

Oh, and "French Canadian" isn't a race. Not even for a white nationalist Trump supporter. C'mon.

And you think that quoting a fake make-up story written by a comedian will convince me of what? That you're a moron? That you're projecting your personal experience onto others? That you're worshiping Satan?

I support him for a number of reasons, including the fact that he doesn't support baby-killing while the Democrats do.

Technically there is only one race- the human race. But leftists like you tend to preach otherwise.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
And you think that quoting a fake make-up story written by a comedian will convince me of what? That you're a moron? That you're projecting your personal experience onto others? That you're worshiping Satan?

I support him for a number of reasons, including the fact that he doesn't support baby-killing while the Democrats do.

So now, you're telling us that you and Trump are democrats? C'mon. If you're going to support abortion, you shouldn't be ashamed of it.

You're new here, so you don't know you're trolling under the wrong bridge. I caught a lot of flak from creationists here when I first pointed out that the Human Genome Project showed that there are no biological human races. The difference is, I actually know that there are no such races, and you're just betraying your own ideology to make a phony point. Why does it always have to be about race for you guys? You're obsessed with it.

And you're still wrong; "French Canadian" isn't a race. It's just your delusion that such "races" exist. It's sort of interesting that you brought up French Canadians, though. They aren't a biological race any more than blacks are a biological race. Would you like to learn how we know?
 
Top