Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John Solomon reports on FBI FISA applications

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John Solomon reports on FBI FISA applications

    This is really incredible. John Solomon has identified a multitude of violations in the FBI's FISA applications. He identifies 51 violations and 9 out right lies in an appendix of the IG's report. Horowitz has blown the whistle on the Democrats, the DOJ and the FBI. He has completely destroyed any thought of honesty in the Russian collusion conspiracy theory.

    To understand just how shoddy the FBI’s work was in securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant targeting the Trump campaign, you only need to read an obscure attachment to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report.

    Appendix 1 identifies the total violations by the FBI of the so-called Woods Procedures, the process by which the bureau verifies information and assures the FISA court its evidence is true.

    The Appendix identifies a total of 51 Woods procedure violations from the FISA application the FBI submitted to the court authorizing surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page starting in October 2016.

    A whopping nine of those violations fell into the category called: “Supporting document shows that the factual assertion is
    inaccurate.”

    For those who don’t speak IG parlance, it means the FBI made nine false assertions to the FISA court. In short, what the bureau said was contradicted by the evidence in its official file.

    To put that in perspective, former Trump aides Mike Flynn and George Papadopoulos were convicted of making single false statements to the bureau. One went to jail already, and the other awaits sentencing.

    The FBI made nine false statements to the court.

    And the appendix shows the FBI made another nine factual assertions that did not match the supporting evidence in the file. In another words, the bureau was misleading on nine other occasions.

    The vast majority of remaining Woods violations — 33 in total — involved failing to provide any evidence in the Woods procedure backing up assertion in the FISA warrant application.

    That’s serious too since the sole purpose of the Wood procedures is to ensure all evidence cited in a FISA application is documented as accurate and reliable so it can be trusted by the courts.
    The article can be found here.

    “Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith.”
    ― Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

    “One and God make a majority.”
    ― Frederick Douglass

  • #2
    This makes me sick and the progressives will not even acknowledge this threat on the democracy in the USA! They would rather defend these crooked cops!

    Pitiful!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
      This makes me sick and the progressives will not even acknowledge this threat on the democracy in the USA! They would rather defend these crooked cops!

      Pitiful!
      MSNBC Incredulously Defends FBI & Discredited Dossier:

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
        This makes me sick and the progressives will not even acknowledge this threat on the democracy in the USA! They would rather defend these crooked cops!

        Pitiful!
        Jerry,

        The goal of socialism is the destruction of liberty, so of course those who accept that political philosophy don't give a rip about liberty/freedom. Those crooked cops are of the same political philosophy so they see nothing wrong abusing their power to rid the world of any threat to their ideology. Bruce Orr and his wife have a long history of agreeing with socialistic ideology and activism promoting it. Nelly Orr is very dedicated to it, clear down to the way she chooses to dress. Her academic history shows how much support she exhibited for the Soviet Union and how they treated their own people.

        Remember the expressions on Strzok's face when he was called to testify? They were no accident. He couldn't expressed his hatred of those who disagree with him deeply enough. There was no evidence of any regret for lying and deception whatsoever in his facial expressions or his behavior. He obviously felt he was not bound by any law or morality.

        “Liberty cannot be established without morality, nor morality without faith.”
        ― Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

        “One and God make a majority.”
        ― Frederick Douglass

        Comment

        Working...
        X