Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Real Science Friday: Comets

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Real Science Friday: Comets

    Comets

    This is the show from Friday March 19th, 2010.

    BEST QUOTES OF THE SHOW:
    Of the short period comets which are 205 out of the 1000 known comets...within 10,000 years they will all be gone because Jupiter will sweep them all up. This is a huge problem for astronomers [who believe the universe is billions of years old]. And there has never been a new comet observed to form. All the comets we see are within the solar system's sphere of influence and we have never seen a new one built
    The reason why Dr. Brownlee at the University of Washington convinced NASA to spend 200 million dollars to send the Stardust space probe up to the Wild 2 comet is because the Wild 2 comet was coming in for the first time and they thought it would be pristine and it would bring back all this - the beginning of the universe, big bang stuff that would be formed in the outer reaches near absolute zero cold space. Well, what it ended up bringing back are minerals that can only form in liquid water such as limestone. How can limestone be in liquid water that was supposedly out in the outer reaches of space its entire life where it's where it's minus 400 degrees or so farenheight?
    SUMMARY:

    * Kevin Lea Talks about Comets: Bob Enyart and Kevin Lea, a Washington state pastor with a background in nuclear physics, talk about comets: their size, speed, orbits, composition, and lifespan, and origin!

    * Today's Resource: Have you browsed through our Science Department in the KGOV Store? Check out especially Walt Brown'
    In the Beginning and Bob's interviews with this great scientist in Walt Brown Week! You'll also love Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez' Privileged Planet (clip), and Illustra Media's Unlocking the Mystery of Life You can consider our BEL Science Pack; Bob Enyart's Age of the Earth Debate; Bob's debate about Junk DNA with famous evolutionist Dr. Eugenie Scott; And the superb kids' radio programming, Jonathan Park: The Adventure Begins! And Bob strongly recommends that you subscribe to CMI's tremendous Creation magazine!
    WARNING: Graphic video here.

  • #3
    Awesome show. That's how to do science!
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Comment


    • #4
      Originally posted by Stripe View Post
      Awesome show. That's how to do science!
      They haven't 'done' any science.

      Comment


      • #5
        Originally posted by Chalmer Wren View Post
        They haven't 'done' any science.
        Make predictions and test them. That's how to do science.
        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
        E≈mc2
        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
        -Bob B.

        Comment


        • #6
          Originally posted by Stripe View Post
          Make predictions and test them. That's how to do science.
          Exactly. The evolutionists are constantly "shocked" at what they discover. Meanwhile, we Bible thumpers just yawned with boredom because we knew what the probe was going to discover from this comet before the probe was even launched.

          The best part of this whole story is our anti-bible government which strives for the separation of church and state spent 200 million dollars that resulted in evidence for the truth of the Bible.
          WARNING: Graphic video here.

          Comment


          • #7
            evolutionists.
            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
            E≈mc2
            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
            -Bob B.

            Comment


            • #8
              Originally posted by Stripe View Post
              Make predictions and test them. That's how to do science.
              You mean like the theory of Relativity?

              Comment


              • #9
                Originally posted by Flipper View Post
                You mean like the theory of Relativity?
                Of course. Relativity is a scientific theory that explains observations. It's useful and accessible.

                Why would you bring that up?
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • #10
                  I thought you rejected relativity because it requires time dilation.

                  Although biology is a lot messier than physics, evolution also explains observations and makes predictions. Are you agreeing that evolution is also a scientific theory?

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    Originally posted by Flipper View Post
                    I thought you rejected relativity because it requires time dilation.
                    How I understand it only requires a few changes to a few labels. Clocks are affected by gravity rather than space. Doesn't make the world work any differently, just makes the explanation far more reasonable.

                    Although biology is a lot messier than physics, evolution also explains observations and makes predictions. Are you agreeing that evolution is also a scientific theory?
                    No .. evolution is a bad joke that's gone on too long. It's of zero use, remains untestable and is adhered to because of a blind devotion to .. something.

                    But what has this thread got to do with evolution?
                    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                    E≈mc2
                    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                    -Bob B.

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      It's astounding how inventive people are.
                      Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                      E≈mc2
                      "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                      "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                      -Bob B.

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                        Make predictions and test them. That's how to do science.
                        They've only critiqued other peoples results.

                        Comment


                        • #14
                          Originally posted by Chalmer Wren View Post
                          They've only critiqued other peoples results.
                          :squint:

                          Did you listen to the show? There has been a prediction made that a comet will return in 2012. That is science. That is what I'm talking about. What are you talking about?
                          Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                          E≈mc2
                          "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                          "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                          -Bob B.

                          Comment


                          • #15
                            Atheists clearly aren't interested in science....
                            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                            E≈mc2
                            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                            -Bob B.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X