What utter vacuous drivel aCW!Spoiler
With those words of wisdom from Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson, this concludes this segment on "Why Art Brain MUST Be Institutionalized!"
:think: ......................... :AMR1: I wanted your feedback on the actual story.
lain:Not when it comes to gay sex, apparently. Or mayhap they are........ :think:
I'm not a woman aCW but I'm fairly sure that they pee out of it too, ask your wife if you don't believe me.
A God who actually chose to combine sexual pleasure with waste disposal and childbirth does seem a little bit unlikely to me aCW.
Oh well (sigh) some guys have all luck it seems, but whatever turns you on aCW
.
I'm not a woman aCW but I'm fairly sure that they pee out of it too, ask your wife if you don't believe me.
God or Darwinian evolution seems to have arranged things so that waste disposal, sexual intercourse and childbirth are multi-tasked? :think:
A God who actually chose to combine sexual pleasure with waste disposal and childbirth does seem a little bit unlikely to me aCW.
All of which does seem to make Darwinian evolution rather more likely for me than created, as is, by the God supposed by anonymous ancient middle eastern goat herders in their often highly esteemed scriptures.
Oh well (sigh) some guys have all luck it seems, but whatever turns you on aCW
Personally however it's more often than not the soft gentle curves and overall femininity of the whole female body that seems to do it for me rather than just the vagina, but maybe I'm a little bit unusual perhaps?
Or maybe you simply haven't really noticed such things about women aCW?
Touché aCW, touché.
I won't argue the exact technical details but I think I was nevertheless reasonably close enough with the location.
Is that what it you deduced from Genesis aCW? (Hardly from evidence based natural sciences.)
Many homosexuals will agree with you, while many heterosexuals don't care.
Good for you aCW, I sincerely hope that the feeling is mutual.
I clearly spend considerably less time defending homosexuality than you do attacking it. I rather suspect that your wife must be a very understanding and tolerant person.
Marry? Why, how quaint aCW.
The Federalist found the story poignant enough to publish, and the two women found Stefano and Domenico to be heroic. I think this is sufficient in most people's minds to render them admirable in an era such as ours.
I think it's clear that American culture (and Western culture in general) has become so steeped in postmodernism that it does indeed take people like Dolce and Gabbana to voice what would be dismissed coming from a religious figure. It's simply where we stand now (and we stand where the amazingly prescient Kierkegaard indicated we would more than a century and a half ago.)
Well, their standpoint is that they are Sicilian Italians and Catholics who both revere and stand outside of original civilization (they've become billionaires in the Unravelling).
Yes, in mine, and in Brian Brown's, and in Catholic scholars at First Things, and in the minds of the two women who wrote that letter, and in the editors at The Federalist.
:think: ....................
I don't really want to labour the point but firstly you are technically correct aCW, I'll concede that much, although the wiki vagina page on it does also include the urethra as a relevant part.
Safer sex has always been my mantra aCW, for whoever is doing it, however they are doing it.
lain:
I know I am not mocking it. Please point out where I mocked it. Rather: I am pointing out a cultural phenomenum.
