glorydaz
Well-known member
|
|
I have a feeling these boys would rather play alone.
They seem to be hinting rather strongly.
Don't be too naughty, boys, we can still see you. :chuckle:
Warmbier deserved his cruel torture because of white privilege
- Thread starter ClimateSanity
- Start date
I have a feeling these boys would rather play alone.
They seem to be hinting rather strongly.
Don't be too naughty, boys, we can still see you. :chuckle:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The terms are actually rather restrained if you consider that rape can be deserved. Someone holding up a store at gunpoint is committing a violent crime and the possible consequences for it are justifiable, including being shot to protect those under attack. Rape could be a consequence for a drunken woman walking naked through a park but there's no justification for her being raped and nor does she deserve to be. If you can't see the massive difference then the disturbance here is all yours.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
She wrote, without support, with malice, and not a hint of self-awareness.
Ah, I see what you're doing. Completing your cycle/spiral.
And she fumbles to play the gay innuendo card.
You should try your hand at non-fiction, just for the sake of variety.
glorydaz
Well-known member
If I had ever said a drunk woman walking through the park deserved to be raped, then you might have a point. But, like all libs, you like to twist the facts to make them fit your little LaLaLand scenario.
I am so totally disgusted with your inability to tell the truth. Not just you, but darn near every liberal I come into contact with, have a built in deafness to hearing or comprehending the truth of what is being said. It's DENIAL....even an unknowing denial....a self inflicted blindness and deafness by all those who have lost all their common sense. :nono:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Thou doth protest too much. :chew:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You effectively have said just that when you say that rape victims have or potentially could have 'reaped what they've sown'. That was just one scenario to underscore the insidiousness of such "thinking".
Well, no, as above.
Oh, and calm down, you're perilously close to having a hissy fit...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What is it with some of you far right wingers and the gay innuendo stuff? It's...bizarre.
Scribbling a "thou" in the dirt doesn't really elevate the dirt. :nono:
But thanks for the continuing illustration of moral character you're putting on. I'm hoping it will save PJ from his worst inclinations.
Maybe you should try photos. :think: It's all the rage in some circles and that's where you do your best thinking anyway.
lain:
Meh. She hasn't had any luck with the other shtick and she probably remembered that I was offended by it with Eeset a long time ago. It's just noise these days. Investing any emotion in someone like that is compounding their mistake.
But yeah, it's a peculiar habit by the least rational on the right. The worst thing a liberal has called me around here was an apologist for the religious right.
And there was some truth in that, at least.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Apparently the best you can do is to invent some lurid gay innuendo up and chuckle at yourself.
Impressive...
I offended you? Oh gosh, sorry.
Don't give it another thought. There's no reason to break your streak on my account.I offended you? Oh gosh, sorry.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Eh, it seems to be a 'go to' option and it's actually pretty funny these days. With aCW it was kinda expected, given his obsession but for Christians who are supposedly repelled by it and to then invent lurid stuff up?
Go figure...
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
the definition of "deserved" at play was "earned by one's actions"
and the circumstances that brought me into the discussion a year and a half ago had to do with college students getting hours and hours of training and posters and symposia and classroom discussions on methods to avoid putting yourself in a position of vulnerability and those foolish students who chose to ignore that advice and found themselves at risk
It's the tired method of replacing a VALID argument with throwing as much mud at your opponent with the hopes that some of it will stick.
It's really quite remarkable. I've noted something about a short list of hard right irrationalists (it isn't inherent, only present in the group I'm thinking of that, sadly, represents the hard right more often than not around here as posters), they have a habit of declaring their reality in lieu of fact and confusing assumption with conclusion.
By way of, the liberal use of the word liberal to describe anyone who isn't in lock step with them on any particular. At first I thought they simply didn't understand what a liberal actually was or how the term functioned, that it was a point of confusion. So I spent a few weeks meeting the off claim by noting my actual voting record and history, my support of gun ownership, my belief in fiscal responsibility, my belief that a market economy, intelligently regulated, should out perform socialist economies, and my opposition to abortion, issues of distinct separation from the lion's share of people who would actually consider themselves liberals.
Nothing changed.
At that point I realized I was dealing with either irrational or dishonest people and that the only reason the liberal line was thrown out was that they saw it as a deep insult. I don't. It's just inaccurate. Conservatives fought integration and preserved slavery. Liberals defend abortion. Reason to lay serious charges of moral deficiency at their feet. The two camps have also done enormous good and not everyone in either camp supported the evil wrought in its philosophical name.
When people who throw out the word "liar" like candy at a parade routinely speak a thing they know to be untrue, they're irrational and you have to reframe your consideration and response to them. When people usurp the prerogative of God as an expression of their faith they're irrational and you have to reframe your consideration and response to them. When people echo the form of you without demonstrating the foundation of reason and support, and believe that to be sufficient or meaningful, well, you have to recognize who and what you're dealing with and find a measure of compassion for someone that bereft of reason. They really don't know what they're doing a good bit of the time. It's what happens when you feel your way through things best suited for consideration.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
you voted for obama in 2008
you defend homosexual "marriage"
your support for islam is embarrassing
you support too many liberal causes to mention
the only people who believe your claims of being non-liberal are your liberal buddies like anna, rusha, artie....
you may claim that you're not a liberal, but if so, you're the most retarded conservative imaginable
you defend homosexual "marriage"
your support for islam is embarrassing
you support too many liberal causes to mention
the only people who believe your claims of being non-liberal are your liberal buddies like anna, rusha, artie....
you may claim that you're not a liberal, but if so, you're the most retarded conservative imaginable