Once again, an article that proves John Nelson Darby invented Dispensationalism.....
Yet, just about every Dispensationalist on TOL lives in denial. They all refuse to acknowledge that Darby invented Dispensationalism.
You devious punk, you, with your "invented" spam, which is sophistry, part of your "trifecta"-"You follow men/You follow fallible men"
Again-his spam "argument" on every thread, that allegedly closes the deal on the dispensationalism approach to understanding the book.
Are not all falsehoods, "'invented," you devious punk, by "men?" How does your devious, deceiftful qualifier, "invented," do anything for your "belief system" and discredit another's, regardless of whether it's the dispensational approach, or JW's, or.................?
Prove that your Preterism is "un invented," punk. Just how would you do that, child of the devil?
Your "belief system," I suppose, is "un invented," direct from the LORD God, is infallible, punk? it is "without error?" You know that?
AD 70-ism/Preterism, is "invented."
Prove that it is not, Craigie.
He won't touch that.
Fraud.
1. "You follow the teachings of men.............."-hundreds of times on TOL. Thus, he claims what He has are the infallible teachings of God, never has been taught to him by men, never has followed "men" teachings." Which leads to...
2.Craigie Tet., besides his "Darby" stumper, which he spams on every thread, as one of his "arguments" against the dispensational approach in interpreting the book, also asserts that dispensationalism is false, because it is taught by "fallible men," i.e., he claims that his "AD 70-ism," Preterism, was taught to him by infallible men. To wit:
"Yes Mr. Whalen, they were
fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago. Mr. Whalen, you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?"-Craigie Tet.
"A secret parenthetical time period is a false theory made up by
fallible men.”-Preterist con man Craigie
"MAD is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by
fallable men."-Preterist Craigee Tet.
Just show us, Craigie, the infallible men that we should follow, since you, of course, have the truth, the "not false" belief system, taught to you by infalible men.
Just point out these infallible teachers, so that we will not:
follow the teachings of these fallible men?
Are not all false doctrines, taught by fallible men, Craigie? Why do you add "fallble?" How does that support your "belief system" and annul others?
And why do you add "men," to your "argument" against the dispenstional approach? Whom should we follow? You? Strike that-you are not a man. Women? Aliens? Your father, the devil?
Why do you delete the scripture, in Romans-Philemon, that provides for "teachers...teaching" within the boc? Satan taught you that-the LORD God never did.
It is a deceptive, satanic debating tactic of his, from the pits of hell, sophistry, instigated by this habitual liar, on almost every thread, due to his satanic obsession.
Craigie:
As silent as a turkey farm, on the third Thursday, of November.
He is the habitual liar, of TOL.
