ECT There is only one Gospel

[Grosnick Marowbe]

So you think there is more than one name?

IDIOT. :rotfl:

You look like a "throwback" to the 60s and you have the audacity to call ME an idiot? :rotfl:

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Buzz off, wasted space.

:drum:

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Is that all you have "Whiskers?"

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

Is that all you have "Whiskers?"

Nope.

There's always the ignorance that proceeds from yer mouth.

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

:drum:

Nope.

Yer off the beat, boy.

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

You look like a "throwback" to the 60s and you have the audacity to call ME an idiot? :rotfl:

I'm wearin' my gun now, which means you'll hide under yer bed. :beanboy:

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

I'm wearin' my gun now, which means you'll hide under yer bed. :beanboy:

In both worlds,boy.

Unless you put a price on it.

 

[1Mind1Spirit]

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Damn the flies.:crackup:

 

[Lazy afternoon]

This is superstition, not faith.

Invoking the cross has no power to save. Only by having faith in the Person of Jesus Christ who died on the cross, has the power to save.

Yes.

Moses had to destroy the brass serpent on the stake because the Israelites played the harlot with it.

Madists do the same with 1cor.ch 15:3.

They do not realize that unless they obey Acts 2:38 as Peter preached, and Paul did and taught, that they are still dead in their sins.

which is saying the obvious.

LA

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

I'm wearin' my gun now, which means you'll hide under yer bed. :beanboy:

Nah. I'm not afraid of 1950s Roy Rogers plastic guns complete with plastic holster and badge.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Nope.

There's always the ignorance that proceeds from yer mouth.

You might just suffer from a rare "Hair Follicle" disease, where your unkept overly long "Blackbeard the Pirate" whiskers suddenly become ingrown and reach your spinal cord and continue to grow up into your brain and block your thought processes. It may be already too late?

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Damn the flies.:crackup:

Watch your language Whiskers.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

In both worlds,boy.

Unless you put a price on it.

Didn't quite understand this here post of yours Pops? Better get some well-deserved sleep and try your best to make sense in the morning? Consider a nice warm bath and a shave. Don't forget to spray on some cheap Cologne for your families sake, if not for your own. Look around your cave, you may find some old "007 Cologne" from 1965 or so.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

Nope.

Yer off the beat, boy.

Well, with all that hair/beard you no doubt, "March to a different Drummer." A really DIFFERENT drummer.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Nang: Always and forever, the actress.

Yes, the false piety bleeds through in every post.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Why do you want things fragmented?

God made them different for a reason.
I am not qualified to mix them and make them one. Neither are you.

 

[Interplanner]

God made them different for a reason.
I am not qualified to mix them and make them one. Neither are you.

You're not qualified to fragment, you mean. How can you possibly read the account of Gal 1-2 and fragment, when the whole force of the passage is that the unity was the resolution and Peter's capitulation was the problem? You don't know what you are looking at.

THERE IS NO OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN BY WHICH MEN ARE SAVED is the same Gospel that was started back in the Prophets, oops, Genesis. There were other shadow-episodes with Israel but none were of this magnitude of the Reality that is in Christ, with whom the end of the ages came.

Please deal in reasons, not "positions" or "conclusions". All it it amounts to is firing discredits at me, which is not the work of theology, which is actual exegetical reasons.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

You're not qualified to fragment, you mean.

God made them different. Let them be.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

You're not qualified to fragment, you mean. How can you possibly read the account of Gal 1-2 and fragment, when the whole force of the passage is that the unity was the resolution and Peter's capitulation was the problem? You don't know what you are looking at.

THERE IS NO OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN BY WHICH MEN ARE SAVED is the same Gospel that was started back in the Prophets, oops, Genesis. There were other shadow-episodes with Israel but none were of this magnitude of the Reality that is in Christ, with whom the end of the ages came.

Please deal in reasons, not "positions" or "conclusions". All it it amounts to is firing discredits at me, which is not the work of theology, which is actual exegetical reasons.

1. Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.
2. Jesus Christ died for your sins, was buried, and rose again for your justification.

These are not the exact same good news. One is who Jesus is. The other is what he did for you.

When Paul preached the faith he once destroyed, it was #1. I showed you the scripture. It is not complex.

 

[Grosnick Marowbe]

You're not qualified to fragment, you mean. How can you possibly read the account of Gal 1-2 and fragment, when the whole force of the passage is that the unity was the resolution and Peter's capitulation was the problem? You don't know what you are looking at.

THERE IS NO OTHER NAME UNDER HEAVEN BY WHICH MEN ARE SAVED is the same Gospel that was started back in the Prophets, oops, Genesis. There were other shadow-episodes with Israel but none were of this magnitude of the Reality that is in Christ, with whom the end of the ages came.

Please deal in reasons, not "positions" or "conclusions". All it it amounts to is firing discredits at me, which is not the work of theology, which is actual exegetical reasons.

So, what's wrong with "firing discredits" at YOU if you're wrong at times? Just a simple question.