ECT The Roman Catholic "Religion"
- Thread starter Old man
- Start date
Is the proof found in the Bible that the Apostle Peter actually came to Rome and founded the Roman catholic church (religion)?
If so, Book, Chapter and Verses please. If just another of the RCC's many fables to reach a claim, forget it.
Hmmmm. Yes, Book, Chapter and Verse. But he can't produce. It is a fable.
Cruciform
New member
Name another religious group in history---besides the Catholic Church--- that actually fits the biblical paradigm of Christ's one historic Church.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Cruciform
New member
Actually, the 16th-century Protestant notion of sola scriptura---upon which his demand for "chapter-and-verse is based---is a fable. Try again.
If it is truth, which it's not, produce Book, Chapter and Verse.
Cruciform
New member
If the basis of your demand is truth, which it's not, produce chapter-and-verse for the assumption that "Everything a Christian believes and does must be spelled out explicitly in the Bible."
Back to Post #45 above.
That is an evading tactic, answering a question with a question. Which means you can not show from the Bible that the Apostle Peter had anything whatsoever to do with the origin of your so called Christ's one historic church.
In the NT it is the "Church of God" that is Christ's one and only historic Church which predates your man made catholic religion.
we have more than just the bible
we have a real church in rome
and
it has been there for nearly 2000 years
it is not imaginary
it is real
Have you ever got that right! You catholics HAVE A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN JUST THE BIBLE, you have created a whole man made religion outside of the Bible which of its self has very little to do with your religion.
As for your 2000 years, no, much longer, catholicism is nothing but Babylonian-ism dressed up in new wrappings and presented as Christian.
Last edited:
Cruciform
New member
Your utter inability to name any valid non-Catholic alternative which fulfills the biblical Church paradigm is noted.
Already answered here. Also see this.
Both the very same Church.
By the way, you "forgot" to provide the info requested in Post #47 above... :think:
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Wrong!
The Apostles of the inspired NT Scriptures were no more catholic than is a gaggle of geese.
You do know what the "inspired" Word of God as written by the Apostles of Christ means I hope.
Why do you catholics place more faith in words of the vatican than in Words of the Holy Bible?
Cruciform
New member
Rather, we place more faith in the authoritative teachings of Christ's one historic Church than we do in your preferred interpretations of God's Word. Big difference there.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
I agree with this man made post
Cruciform
New member
Feel free, then, to actually disprove my statement.
There again, it does no good to ask for Scriptural proof from you catholics.
Like, weekly sunday observance, annual easter and xmass celebrating, no such traditions found in the Scriptures, Christ nor the Apostles show no record of observing your non-Scripture traditions which are all traceable back to pagan origins.
Sunday, the sun-gods-day.
easter, the pagans queen of heaven (your mary) spring equinox.
Dec. 25, xmass the annul rebirth of the sun-god, winter saturnalia.
All pagan to the core!!!
Last edited:
Cruciform
New member
You're the one who needs to provide proof (Post #57).
In fact, Sunday worship is indeed reflected in the New Testament. Also, believers have celebrated both Christ's Nativity (birth) and his Resurrection from the very beginning of the early Church. In any case, none of these is a doctrine of the Christian faith, so your complaint that they (supposedly) aren't taught in Scripture simply falls flat.
Besides simply being wrong, you need to Google the term "Genetic Fallacy," since that is the particular logical error you're committing here.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Last edited:
"Babylonian and pagan roots of the Catholic Church"
The RCC tries to always lead the people to read Catholic history of Christianity, by this they try to testify that they are the same thing as the early church, which they are not in any way.
The RCC church history is mainly written by Catholic and therefore, its emphasis is Catholic and distortions are also of Catholic origin.
www.kotipetripaavola.com/catholicchurchbabylonianpaganroots.html
A man made religion (cult)!
The RCC tries to always lead the people to read Catholic history of Christianity, by this they try to testify that they are the same thing as the early church, which they are not in any way.
The RCC church history is mainly written by Catholic and therefore, its emphasis is Catholic and distortions are also of Catholic origin.
www.kotipetripaavola.com/catholicchurchbabylonianpaganroots.html
A man made religion (cult)!