Rather, I consistently advocate for a rational and fact centered approach to issues. On a site where almost all of the threads are created and populated by the right, most of what I have to say will address that perspective. Not that long ago I was accused of being an apologist for the religious right by a poster here who was a solid liberal and saw me and my response to his proffer the way people too far to the right to be reasonable, you for one, do from the other side.
I talk about what's being talked about. But I've also learned it really wouldn't matter. It's always something when you're talking to someone on the fringe. Elsewhere I've made posts with a concerted effort to balance criticism and what inevitably happens is those far enough to one side or the other invent some sense of disparity to decry.
Nah. You mean when it comes to Trump all you see are criticisms. Now think really hard and you'll recall me being as hard on candidate Clinton. Literally asking people not to vote for her.
Rather, I present as someone who opposed putting that monument to a lack of character into the White House. I briefly hoped he'd surprise. He didn't.
