Sessions met with Russian envoy 2X last year, encounters he later did not disclose!

rexlunae

New member
so why are you willing to give Pelosi the benefit of the doubt and not Sessions, in fact Sessions brief contact was only congratulatory in nature with several ambassadors from other countries?

For several reasons. For one thing, Pelosi didn't make that claim under oath, so even if she did lie, which there is little evidence of, it's not illegal. And the photo of her at a dinner with Kislyak was from years ago, and he wasn't the most senior Russian at the table. Most likely, if she recalled the meeting, she would have recalled a group dinner with Medvedev. It's much harder to believe that Sessions didn't recall any of these recent meetings over the course of this election cycle. And Sessions's responses haven't been to deny remembering the meeting. He's been trying to parse the meaning of the questions down to the bare threads. That may save him from a perjury charge, but just barely, but it sure looks like he was being less than fully honest. And then there's the context of being in an administration which has lied about and understated its contacts with Russian officials.

At bottom, it's a judgement call. But I think it's pretty definitively different.
 

jeffblue101

New member

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...zer-jeff-sessions-meeting-russian-ambassador/
The first came at a conference on “Global Partners in Diplomacy,” where Sessions was the keynote speaker. Sponsored by the U.S. State Department, The Heritage Foundation, and several other organizations, it was held in Cleveland during the Republican National Convention.

The conference was an educational program for ambassadors invited by the Obama State Department to observe the convention. The Obama State Department handled all of the coordination with ambassadors and their staff, of which there were about 100 at the conference.

Apparently, after Sessions finished speaking, a small group of ambassadors—including the Russian ambassador—approached the senator as he left the stage and thanked him for his remarks. That’s the first “meeting.” And it’s hardly an occasion—much less a venue—in when a conspiracy to “interfere” with the November election could be hatched.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/time...nections-russian-ambassador/story?id=45855918
Mid-July, 2016, on the sidelines of the RNC: Sessions spoke at an event hosted by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, held during the Republican National Convention. After his speech, Sessions spoke to a small group of ambassadors after giving a speech and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak was among them.

A DOJ official told ABC News that this second interaction was a brief encounter after a public event attended by a number of ambassadors.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
By emphasizing a side point on the way to the main point, and characterizing it as the whole thing.

I just quoted your words. You said them. You even admit they were a point you made.

Being a side point you admit you made, means i mischaracterized you, by citing only your words?

Ive seen it all now.
 

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Mrs Bill Clinton sold access to the White House as Secretary of State through the Clinton Crime Family Foundation. Open the investigation so get and her rapist husband can be put in prison where they belong.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Here's a pretty evenhanded look at the situation from The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin, speaking with Michael McFaul, President’s Obama's top aide on Russia policy at the National Security Council.

There is nothing inherently wrong with the fact that Flynn, Sessions, and other Trump advisers talked to the Russian Ambassador. With the Kislyak affair, in which multiple conversations between Trump officials and the Ambassador have been concealed, so far, we have a coverup without a crime.

. . . .

And yet there was something about their contacts with Kislyak that caused both Flynn and Sessions to conceal them. McFaul, while cautioning against overreacting, said that the amount of contact was unusual, more than he had in 2008, as an Obama adviser. But the denial of contact was even more unusual. “Why are they being so deceptive about it?” McFaul asked. “That makes no sense to me at all.”
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
And yet there was something about their contacts with Kislyak that caused both Flynn and Sessions to conceal them. McFaul, while cautioning against overreacting, said that the amount of contact was unusual, more than he had in 2008, as an Obama adviser. But the denial of contact was even more unusual. “Why are they being so deceptive about it?” McFaul asked. “That makes no sense to me at all.”
They had to lie to hide their involvement in "fixing" the election. It worked. Trump won and nobody can take that away from him :chuckle:
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
Sessions met with Russian envoy 2X last year, encounters he later did not disclose!

17 American intelligence agencies all agree that the Russians were responsible for hacking the DNC and attempting to influence the 2016 Presidential Election.

So when Sessions recused himself, why didn't he tell the American public that he had admonished the Russian Ambassador for interfering in the Election?

Either he doesn't believe his own intelligence community or he approves of how the Russians have conducted themselves!
 
Top