No, but it's assumptive of you to think so...and you missed a smile in there too.
No, an evasion is being asked a yes or no question and failing to answer yes or no. Or answering on another point.
Why it's so hard for you to speak your heresy plainly in denial is a curious thing. Jesus is or isn't fully God. I'm in the "is" camp.
You don't appear to be.
Your problem, I think, is that you don't understand something Hebrews 2:9 should have taught you, capped with Philippians 2:5-11
We still aren't talking about whether he is the Father, only whether he is fully God. That's what seems to gall you. It's absolutely what galls meshak.
Of course he would, because the teaching doesn't change God. What changed is how we can relate to him. Because after the cross, something important changed.
Straw flying everywhere. Windmills tilting full blast.
Of course not, but I wasn't speaking to scripture, as you know, but to what you were doing and, more importantly, what you weren't doing.
Where I'm not even a little surprised that you keep trying to do this now.
That's a goofy and dishonest insult. But it isn't surprising. I'll omit the repetition and its like.
Not God then. Okay heretic. I understand your defense of meshak now about as well as I need to.
No, again answering this peculiarly twisted habit of yours, I said those who don't acknowledge the authority behind the name are reducing it.
People like you and meshak. Heretics.
The rest of your insult and straw throwing aren't of particular interest to me. You could have saved us both a great deal of time and simply declared Christ to be a man granted power by God but not fully God and ended this ages ago. I was clear enough on the point.
EDIT: you should add your name to the tally. Meshak was bold enough: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=1312
Last edited:
lain: The high today? A fall like 87.