Poll question for TOL's leftists

[Rusha]

Voted "no", almost voted for the third option because the question doesn't hinge on the religion of the attackers. That's an important caveat, which the construction of the question tries to package deceptively.

:chuckle: Which is why I voted for the third option. The question was answered in the same spirit is was asked.

 

[rexlunae]

:chuckle: Which is why I voted for the third option. The question was answered in the same spirit is was asked.

Yup. I can see doing that.

 

[musterion]

Voted "no", almost voted for the third option because the question doesn't hinge on the religion of the attackers.

In the context of modern Europe, it damn well does.

 

[rexlunae]

Whats complicated about this question?

Are these women racist for defending themselves against rapist Muslims?

The fact that the last word does nothing but make a dubious suggestion. As if there aren't enough non-Muslim rapists to make the question just as relevant without that addition.

 

[ok doser]

would they be racist if they defended themselves against black rapists?

 

[musterion]

As if there aren't enough non-Muslim rapists to make the question just as relevant without that addition.

Over 90% of reported rapes in some cities have been committed by Muslim invaders. But you already know that.

 

[Angel4Truth]

The fact that the last word does nothing but make a dubious suggestion. As if there aren't enough non-Muslim rapists to make the question just as relevant without that addition.

So if i said i needed to defend myself against rapist white men, i would be racist?

There are rapists in all races, but in islam specifically it seems to be ok legally to take the women of others and specifically to rape them if they arent garbed up. That should bother you.

 

[Rusha]

Sigh. I am going to go out on a limb here and state one of the options of the poll should be:

I think that any person regardless of their religion, gender, sexuality, race, occupation, etc. who is about to be preyed on by a rapist has the right and my support to use any means available to stop them. Cold in their tracks.

Clear enough.

 

[rexlunae]

So if i said i needed to defend myself against rapist white men, i would be racist?

There are rapists in all races, but in islam specifically it seems to be ok legally to take the women of others and specifically to rape them if they arent garbed up. That should bother you.

Lets save some time. You can fill in anything as a noun at the end of the sentence, and it comes out the same way.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Sigh. I am going to go out on a limb here and state one of the options of the poll should be:

I think that any person regardless of their religion, gender, sexuality, race, occupation, etc. who is about to be preyed on by a rapist has the right and my support to use any means available to stop them. Cold in their tracks.

Clear enough.

Agree!

 

[Angel4Truth]

Lets save some time. You can fill in anything as a noun at the end of the sentence, and it comes out the same way.

In other words not racist to see it that way.

See how easy that was?

 

[rexlunae]

In other words not racist to see it that way.

See how easy that was?

In other words, exactly what I said in my first post.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Whats complicated about this question?

Are these women racist for defending themselves against rapist Muslims?

The question isn't simply concerned about women having the right to take whatever measures necessary to defend themselves against rapists, Muslims or otherwise as you fine well know. If this were simply about rape itself then you also know that everyone (nutballs aside) from left to right on here would support women using anything to overcome their attacker including lethal force if it came to it.

This thread is not about that. This thread is based on some unsupported news article that Musty read somewhere and is more about his delusional and crackpot notions that Europe will be under some sort of Sharia law somewhere down the line. If you can't read between the OP's lines then I suggest you start.

 

[Arthur Brain]

In the context of modern Europe, it damn well does.

No, it doesn't. You got a cite for this 'news article' you read yet?

 

[Angel4Truth]

The question isn't simply concerned about women having the right to take whatever measures necessary to defend themselves against rapists, Muslims or otherwise as you fine well know. If this were simply about rape itself then you also know that everyone (nutballs aside) from left to right on here would support women using anything to overcome their attacker including lethal force if it came to it.

This thread is not about that. This thread is based on some unsupported news article that Musty read somewhere and is more about his delusional and crackpot notions that Europe will be under some sort of Sharia law somewhere down the line. If you can't read between the OP's lines then I suggest you start.

You do know that its ok to rape women in the countries those men come from right? Especially if they are secular women, and or not dressed as they deem fit. Its a fact, ignore it at ones peril.

Hide your kids hide your wife, that kind of thing. They are raping everyone up in there. (Germany)

Context is where i suggest you start.

 

[Nick M]

Whats complicated about this question?

She is evil and hates America. Islam is her ally in that regard and it is tough to juggle their oppression of women with silencing the gospel.

 

[Rusha]

She is evil and hates America. Islam is her ally in that regard and it is tough to juggle their oppression of women with silencing the gospel.

:yawn: Your nose had to grow with that whopper.