Cross Reference
New member
Which one? Yours? Sorry, not interested.
ECT MADists don't follow Paul
- Thread starter tetelestai
- Start date
Which one? Yours? Sorry, not interested.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
You don't know what a "dispensation" is, and you don't what "grace" is. You don't know Paul's gospel. Yours is another.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No, the wolf pack is the Dispo hoard of false Trinitarians. You and your other carnivores devouring the very flesh of God by denying Christ without even knowing it.
Right Divider
Body part
You just LOVE to try to sound smart.
Did I say that I had the Mind of God?
You missed the point, as usual.
P.S. Though the Bible does say that we have the mind of Christ.
1Cor 2:16 (KJV)
(2:16) For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.
heir
TOL Subscriber
"You don't know..."
"You don't know..."
"You don't know..."
According to you, no one knows anything, since according to you: words in the English have no meaning and we can't believe the words on the page of all scripture even though that's what God tells us throughly furnishes us (2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV).
Make up your mind - first you agree with moron Tet's imbecilic post that there is nothing objective in what I post, and then you agree with my post as being objective :chuckle:
What a mess....The gospel/good news of the kingdom, is not equivalent to the gospel/good news Paul to which Paul referred, junkie.
"All of you are biblically illiterate.."-Jeff the junkie
Good one, JJ......You don't even know what the term "gospel" means, and you are going to weigh in on "biblically illiterate?" You can't touch me, biblically, Hoss, so save your disjointed scribble.
"the complete inspiration of God through human authorship "-JJ
You don't even know what inspiration is, JJ-and it is not taking a big bong hit.
"unscooped litterbox."-JJ
And Jeff the junkie is going to "school" us on "the Greek," and English," in proper languauage.
Take your seat, you stoned clown....Big Top marches on...
Last edited:
You gospel is the one your saint Judas preached.
Aletheiophile
New member
Yes, except that the Biblical languages were specially chosen. And the expressive power of individual words requires paragraphs in English. The closest would be something like Erasmus' Paraphrases.
Are people saved, and do they have a life in Christ via an English Bible? Of course. But are they more prone to error due to English? Of course. It's not necessarily an issue of salvation. And God is never bound. He has already revealed Himself...and He chose Greek as the missionary language. Greek has a great metaphysical depth that the surface level translation simply does not express.
That's actually quite simply addressed. The manuscripts agree on the majority of the text, and most discrepancies are not on key doctrinal issues.
But if you are so stubborn about not needing Greek, then this conversation does not need to go further. Have fun with an ambiguous subjective reading of English.
Aletheiophile
New member
Have you considered that I can agree with part of an argument without agreeing with the whole?
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
They can't ever consider any such thing. They have one mode. Search and destroy according their false gospel that Christ is not the all in all.
They cannot see that the physical body of Christ was of the dust of the ground as the promise (anarthrous) fulfilled. If you were a Dispo (as I was for many years), you understand how deceived they are. I was lost. I'm very concerned that they are, too.
Cross Reference
New member
Right Divider
Body part
Where did you get that idea? That must be somewhere in the Hebrew/Greek only version.
Right Divider
Body part
More nonsense and false accusations from the "oh so smarter than everyone else PPS".
We claim the salvation that is in Jesus Christ and you call us unsaved. It might just be the other way around.
Right Divider
Body part
CR, you are seriously one of the dumbest posters on TOL. You can't even quote a post properly.
My perceived arrogance is in your mind. I am not arrogant but direct. It's too bad that you don't like it.
Aletheiophile
New member
....The tradition of the church and biblical Judaism to uphold those textual traditions for thousands of years? Maybe that's where I got it. :duh:
Right Divider
Body part
LOL, you should put "duh" at the end of all of your posts if that's how your "logic" works.
Once again, explain HOW these languages where "specially chosen".
Your reliance on human traditions proves absolutely nothing.
The Hebrews spoke Hebrew. So why would they ever change the language of their scriptures? Why wasn't the so-called NT in Hebrew as well?
Aletheiophile
New member
You are not getting my point. You are nitpicking my word choice like you do scripture. I'm not going to discuss this if you refuse to understand.
There are no doctrinal discrepancies in the King James Bible - You're stoned
Right Divider
Body part
You can't have it both ways. Make up your mind.
You claimed that the languages were "specially chosen". Go ahead and explain what you mean.
You come off as a language snob and then complain when people ask you to support the words that you chose to use.
I guess that it's impossible to communicate in English.