I will not vote for trump

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned

Hillary’s Hotline to Moscow

As Democrats try to link Trump to Putin, new Clinton connections to Kremlin emerge
by Kathryn Blackhurst | Updated 01 Aug 2016 at 12:39 PM
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/hillarys-hotline-moscow/

QUOTE:
Just as the Democrats closed out their convention week by painting Donald Trump as firmly intertwined with Russian President Vladimir Putin, new details emerged exposing Hillary Clinton’s actual cozy Russian relationship.

During her tenure as secretary of state, Clinton was charged with helping to oversee a major “reset” of relations with Russia, primarily by exchanging technological information.

The highly trumpeted shift in policy was manifest in the creation of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission in 2009 that made Clinton the chief American representative, alongside Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. The commission’s mission was to identify “areas of cooperation and [pursue] joint projects” between Silicon Valley and its Russian counterpart in Skolkovo.

“Soon, dozens of U.S. tech firms, including top Clinton Foundation donors like Google, Intel, and Cisco, made major financial contributions to Skolkovo, with Cisco committing a cool $1 billion,” Peter Schweizer, the author of “Clinton Cash,” wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday. “By 2012 the vice president of the Skolkovo Foundation, Conor Lenihan — who had previously partnered with the Clinton Foundation — recorded that Skolkovo had assembled 28 Russian, American, and European ‘Key Partners.’ Of the 28 ‘partners,’ 17, or 60 percent, have made financial commitments to the Clinton Foundation, totaling tens of millions of dollars, or sponsored speeches by Bill Clinton.”

But it wasn’t only U.S. firms who benefited from the official policy that contributed to the Clinton Foundation.

Russians involved in the Skolkovo thaw also sent in whopping donations to the Clinton catch-all depository for wealth and influence.

Security experts raised alarms that the transfer jeopardized national security in favor of temporary global financial interests.

Research from the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at For Leavenworth stated Skolkovo is a "vehicle for worldwide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology."

"The FBI believes the true motives of the Russian partners, who are often funded by their government, is to gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies," Lucia Ziobro, an assistant special agent at the FBI's Boston office, wrote in an op-ed in 2014. "The [Skolkovo] foundation may be a means for the Russian government to access our nation's sensitive or classified research development facilities and dual-use technologies with military and commercial application."

The takeaway is Clinton intentionally opened up access to U.S. technology and secrets to Russian actors and made herself the fulcrum of the transaction — while American-based global corporations and the Russians contributed to her family's foundation. Yet the media has allowed her allies to link unknown hackers, possibly of Russian nationality, to some myth that Donald Trump is Putin's pick for president.

Of course the self-preserving spin isn't surprising from the Democrats since so much damning material was contained in the over 19,000 emails leaked from the Democratic National Committee.

"We know that Russian intelligence services, which is part of the Russian government which is under the firm control of Vladimir Putin, hacked into the DNC. And we know that he arranged for a lot of those emails to be released," Clinton told "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace over the weekend, adding that "we know that Donald Trump has shown a very troubling willingness to back up Putin, to support Putin."

When Wallace pressed Clinton over whether or not she thought Putin and the Russians theoretically acted on behalf of Trump's presidential campaign, the former secretary of state balked a bit – but only a tiny bit.

"Well, I'm not going to jump to that conclusion, but I think laying out the facts raises issues about Russian interference in our elections, in our democracy," Clinton responded. "And for Trump to both encourage that and to praise Putin despite what appears to be a deliberate effort to try to affect the election I think raises national security issues."
 

Catholic Crusader

Kyrie Eleison
Banned

Like Bill, like Hillary: LYING RIGHT IN YOUR FACE

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ecked-on-truthful-claim-in-email-scandal.html

Hillary Clinton is getting hammered for saying on “Fox News Sunday” that FBI Director James Comey confirmed her statements on her email scandal were “truthful” – with one prominent fact-checker giving the claim four “Pinocchios.”

The former secretary of state cited Comey when asked to account for her repeated claims that she never sent or received material marked classified on her personal email account. When host Chris Wallace noted that Comey said those things were not true, Clinton disagreed.

“That's not what I heard Director Comey say … Director Comey said that my answers were truthful and what I've said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails,” she said.

The Washington Post Fact Checker picked apart that statement, ultimately giving it four “Pinocchios,” its worst rating for truthfulness.

“Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation,” the Post wrote, noting that she was relying on Comey’s statement to Congress: “We have no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI.”

However, the FBI director did not say the same about her statements to the American public. And during testimony before a House committee, Comey said it was “not true” that nothing Clinton sent or received was marked classified. To the contrary, he said, “there was classified material emailed.

The Post concluded: “While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

“And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.”

Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., also called out Clinton on Twitter for the claims.

The campaign has stressed, with regard to the emails apparently marked classified, that Comey acknowledged during the hearing in question the markings themselves were not properly marked. The State Department also has suggested those markings shouldn’t have been there.

Comey, though, also challenged other statements by Clinton during his testimony. On her claim that she used one device, Comey said, “She used multiple devices.” And on her claim that she turned over all work-related emails, he said, “No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned."

Clinton, meanwhile, acknowledged again on “Fox News Sunday” that she made a “mistake,” while appearing to spread the blame around.

“I take classification seriously. I relied on and had every reason to rely on the judgments of the professionals with whom I worked. And so, in retrospect, maybe some people are saying, ‘Well, … among those 300 people, they made the wrong call,’” Clinton said. “At the time, there was no reason, in my view, to doubt the professionalism and the determination by the people who work every single day on behalf of our country.”


 

Interplanner

Well-known member
...and if you vote for Hilary, you are part of this:

BLM is a dictatorial organization funded by George Soros who helped the Nazi movement liquidate thousands of people in Hungary in WW2. Obama could have stopped the fraud of Hands Up... but of course did not. And has now paid terrorists $400M to free hostages.

The method of "treatment" of the person saying ALM at the U of Houston is EXACTLY how concentration camps worked in the Nazi period. That's all you need to know.



Here is the source material from Starnes Newsletter, dated 8-2-16:

Student Punished for saying All Lives Matter

Politically correct tyranny is afoot at the University of Houston.

A student government association leader was severely punished over a comment she made on Twitter.

"Forget Black Lives Matter - more like All lives Matter"- that's what SGA Vice President Rohini Sethi posted online.

She wrote those words just after the assassination of five Dallas police officers.

The tweet caused an uproar among her fellow collegiate lawmakers as well as - the Black Student Union.

Miss Sethi was suspended from government activities for 50 days. She was also ordered to undergo mandatory diversity training. It's akin to a form of ideological conversion therapy. And I thought liberals were opposed to conversion therapy?

What happened to this young lady is despicable -- she was publically shamed because she believes every life has value.

But such opinions are no longer allowed on public university campuses - where free speech has been strung up by a politically correct lynch mob.



May God give strength and peace to all the members of the Dallas police and families afflicted by their loss, and expose the brutality of BLM with overwhelming force.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
you think it is ugly now -
it could get worse even if trump loses big in november -
some are saying he won't go away -
after all the system is rigged -
the idiots are buying into this and they won't go away either -
I am not optimistic
 
I'm telling you spiritually challenged, scoundrels and reprobates, it's Daffy Duck, all the way, in 2016!

"Change you can get a laugh out of, if nothing else."

Vote Daffy!

img.php


I rest my case.

 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
you think it is ugly now -
it could get worse even if trump loses big in november -
some are saying he won't go away -
after all the system is rigged -
the idiots are buying into this and they won't go away either -
I am not optimistic
If Trump doesn't win, this country is doomed -
 
it is hard to laugh when we have to choose between a baby killer and someone who can't be trusted with the nuclear button

which one will kill the most?

Don't approach me with such questions! I've been clear and unambiguous all along, but they didn't nominate a baboon, now neither Daffy. I've been disenfranchised since birth, that is, since second birth, ergo, discuss it among yourselves.

On the other hand, I would then ask a further question, at least one I deem much weightier, that is, which one will send more people to hell: Hillary, Donald or Francis?

Luke 12:4-5 And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.
 
if you go to hell, you have no one to blame but yourself -
where did you get your theology? -
from daffy?

Forgive me for pointing this out, but you're in no position to criticize even Daffy's theology:

Pope_Satanic_hand_sign.jpg


Matthew 21:16 And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?

article-2603146-1BD9408200000578-292_636x430.jpg


Your biggest problem is that you spend too much time on TOL, and you'll probably also miss the next Quran reading at the Vatican.
 
Jesus said we are to love our enemies -
and that is what the church teaches -
and that means improving our understanding of them

Look, I'm not here to argue with you, will be the first to admit the long, bloody history of Roman Catholicism serving Satan, hands down have no argument that reading antichrist "scripture" from hell isn't consistent. (You'd probably even learn from Daffy we live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God, not antichrists, not Muhammad, not Allah, aka Satan. So, I'm good with Daffy.)

Like your "Vicars of Christ," who join in much Satanic symbolism and deceptive pronouncements, John 8:44, 2 Corinthians 11:14, how they are somehow not, also, despicable, I do, therefore, struggle to get your point about killing. You can't be criticizing murder, given the centuries of Roman Catholicism's crimes against humanity and your allegiance to it. Matthew 7:15-20. Repeat: John 8:44. I'm just trying to understand. I also struggle with the novel approach to loving your enemies being, when in Satan land, do like the Satanists. What next? Sacrifice a goat in St. Peter's Square, to show your love for disciples of Aleister Crowley? What are all these gospels of breakfast with God, and sleep with Satan? James 1:8.

Anyway, back to this killing thing. Are you saying Trump won't kill enough for your tastes? I'm not expecting Christian consistency, nobody's expecting you to go there. And Francis can read from a Batman comic over there in spaghetti land, for all I care. All I'm asking is for some consistency. Is that too much to ask?
 
this is about trump and you are attacking my church -
I don't get it

You see, this is a classic example of what is wearing out my shoes. Let's then try a different approach.

"Trump killing bad. Catholic killing good." "Trump Satan hand bad. Pope Satan hand good." "Trump despicable. Pope God." "See Spot run."

Just never mind. Carry on. Matthew 23:24.
 
Top