You should probably update your understanding of that one too, but I was answering part of Chair's question. Laws that favor one religion over another are going to run afoul as a litmus.
Citizens? List them.
Checks and balances. Look into it. If a law isn't constitutional it won't survive the Court.
That's one explanation: you're right, see it clearly and most of the Western world is peculiarly unconcerned with their own self-interest.
lain:
I'm not an immigration lawyer, but those I know who are would say: no. The act allowed the deportation of naturalized citizens only, and only in conjunction with subversive activities. There are hard thresholds that mostly involve crimes committed before naturalization or being booted from the military dishonorably within five years of naturalization. You can't deport a U.S. citizen. You have to strip them of that first. It's hard and rare.
Part of that interpretation goes to the Constitutionality of a law. Yours wouldn't make it past the Establishment Clause.
Then boy do I have good news for you.
Everyone thinks that until they try to drink the sand.
I'm not an immigration lawyer, but those I know who are would say: no. The act allowed the deportation of naturalized citizens only, and only in conjunction with subversive activities. There are hard thresholds that mostly involve crimes committed before naturalization or being booted from the military dishonorably within five years of naturalization. You can't deport a U.S. citizen. You have to strip them of that first. It's hard and rare.
Being Muslim isn't a subversive activity. And the act has gone through a few changes. Beyond that the act doesn't touch upon that 30+% of Muslims born here.
Part of that interpretation goes to the Constitutionality of a law. Yours wouldn't make it past the Establishment Clause.
Then boy do I have good news for you.
Everyone thinks that until they try to drink the sand.
Islam has been here, but this isn't about being a fan of Islam.
They're 1% of the population. Should be about 2% by 2050.
Not really, but if you want to talk about religion or empires and how they spread, for a time you can make that statement about any of them. About European powers, about Christianity.
You might want to broaden your study. But again, 2% of the population by the next 33 years. And you've completely stepped around my prior stats on how American Muslims actually feel, and how Islam tends to look in countries with Western traditions. None of any of it supports your contention.
lain:Not if you're good at math and use real facts. Pew used actual data over the last several years to chart a reasonable expectation of population growth along those lines. 2% by 2050 (link).
Which, again, the majority of Islam isn't doing and never did.
Not really, but if you want to talk about religion or empires and how they spread, for a time you can make that statement about any of them. About European powers, about Christianity.
You might want to broaden your study. But again, 2% of the population by the next 33 years. And you've completely stepped around my prior stats on how American Muslims actually feel, and how Islam tends to look in countries with Western traditions. None of any of it supports your contention.
But let's say all of Islam radicalized, not just the relative sliver so many conflate with a rule. Say it happened. If 2 percent of anyone can kick the can of the remaining 98% that 98% doesn't deserve its own country to begin with.
Not if you're good at math and use real facts. Pew used actual data over the last several years to chart a reasonable expectation of population growth along those lines. 2% by 2050 (link).
Which, again, the majority of Islam isn't doing and never did.
When you hear a toilet flush do you get homesick?
:rotfl:
