PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
It's the inverse, schismatic non-heir. Words mean exactly what they say, not what you infer them to mean and say.
ECT Grace is unconditional but not universal
- Thread starter Nang
- Start date
- Status
It's the inverse, schismatic non-heir. Words mean exactly what they say, not what you infer them to mean and say.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
No, it is you who spits on it; and you don't even know it.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
The anarthrous nouns in scripture are the final authority. Not you (or your deluded peers) OR me. It's simple. You have departed from the simplicity that is in Christ for the false complexity of what appears to be English simplicity.
heir
TOL Subscriber
There is nothing in your posts that is of use in the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ. I'm done with your insults, too. I have better things to do with God's time.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
You're not a saint or doing the work of ministry or the body of Christ, so you wouldn't know. They weren't insults, they were fact. You are a rank heretic, just like your peers.
You change the basic nouns of scripture into another noun form or into verbs to suit your 19th-century heresies, and you constantly condescend to actual Believers.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
The Covenant of Grace was first revealed to Eve in Genesis 3:15 when a Seed was promised who would crush Satan. All of the Covenant promises to the OT saints, such as Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, etc and al the NT saints is confirmed, revealed, was performed, and taught in the Epistle to the Hebrews . . Which Scriptures you MADists refuse to read and attempt to take away from others edification.
Your loss . . .
Sonnet
New member
Right - last time you asked me to read a whole lot of material and I responded you didn't reply.
(http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?117559-Refuting-Limited-Atonement/page3) - scroll down...
So your:
falls flat and would appear to be directed at yourself.
Sonnet
New member
Paul says - 'this is what we preach' - not 'this what we preach to believers.'
The Calvinist says - 'this what we preach...to believers.'
Who would risk preaching a different Gospel after reading Galatians 1:8-9? It would be obviously be wise to keep the Gospel for believers and unbelievers the same.
As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you (believers) a gospel other than what you accepted (when they were unbelievers), let them be under God’s curse!
And what could be more fundamental than the extent of Christ's death and resurrection? The Calvinist tells unbelievers that it was not necessarily for THEM. Astonishing.
A different gospel.
The Calvinist says - 'this what we preach...to believers.'
Who would risk preaching a different Gospel after reading Galatians 1:8-9? It would be obviously be wise to keep the Gospel for believers and unbelievers the same.
As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you (believers) a gospel other than what you accepted (when they were unbelievers), let them be under God’s curse!
And what could be more fundamental than the extent of Christ's death and resurrection? The Calvinist tells unbelievers that it was not necessarily for THEM. Astonishing.
A different gospel.
Sonnet
New member
Did Paul preach Christ's resurrection to unbelievers?
You got banned for good reason. Are you anti-female or what? You just keep getting worse as time goes by.
I'm a card carrying "Maddest" and I read and study the entire Old and New Testament. So, there goes your generalization Nang. It shows you can be wrong. The problem is, you're just about completely wrong about everything you post. It would be best for you to do more reading and studying and less time bellyaching and being grumpy. You're the grouchiest Calvinist I've ever encountered. Not a good advertisement for Calvinism.
heir
TOL Subscriber
It doesn't say "covenant of grace". You made that term up. Where and what is the good news of Christ to you?
Amen. PPS just has a bag full of words, phrases, and comments that practically nobody can decipher. He brings attention to himself by showing off his supposed higher education. Grant it, he's a bit of a "Wordsmith" however, he uses that as a weapon against the average posters around TOL. He's arrogant, demeaning and self-centered.
Alas, he now has time for self-reflection. Hopefully, he'll use that time wisely and come back a better poster/person?
:rotfl:
Hey, LA, keep trying to make a good point. That way, maybe you'll make one by accident someday? :crackup:
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
You consider pithy one-liners as being responsive? You are quite taken by yourself, I see. Sigh.
AMR
Sonnet
New member
You got more than one line - but one liners are fine.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ed-Atonement&p=4684481&viewfull=1#post4684481
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ed-Atonement&p=4684481&viewfull=1#post4684481
Sonnet
New member
I made a response and you just left the debate and then came back criticizing me for not interacting. Would be better to stick to actually attempting to refute the charge.
Just one scripture that explicitly teaches limited atonement would help...but you can't because there aren't any.
- Status