Rightly divide = chopping the Bible to pieces.
They wouldn't have to divide anything if they just took the 5% of the Bible they believe and made it into a book
ECT Do those who believe MAD have no problem disregarding what Jesus actually taught ?
- Thread starter dodge
- Start date
Rightly divide = chopping the Bible to pieces.
They wouldn't have to divide anything if they just took the 5% of the Bible they believe and made it into a book
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
So Paul was a Satanist?
Romans 5:14
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
1 Corinthians 4:6
And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.
I'm not the Darby follower.
All I'm doing is pointing out the influence of men on Dispensationalists (Darby followers).
True. He sure HATES that dead guy, huh?
That's because all these threads are full of Darby followers.
Have you ever been to a Reformed Forum? Calvin's name comes up all the time.
Without Darby there would be no MAD or A28.
Would it make you happier if I called you a Bullingerite?
You talk exactly like heir.
Gee.....I wonder what the connection is.........?
Do you happen to also be a King James Onlyist?
"All dispensationalists are Darby followers."-Tellalie
The punk couldn't prove that, even if his alleged infallible, according to him, pope Frankie, told him.
Which proves again that he is a habitual liar, engaging in sophistry, on TOL. That is this weasels' "ministry."
Last edited:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Nope.
Why would I beat her?
2 Corinthians 12:9
And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
John Darby is the founder of all the nonsense MADism ultimately is- Pauline extremist 'rapture' folk :idunno:
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Darby's the great granddaddy.
You're one of those little pests that never can think of anything meaningful to say so you just float around and annoy people. Every forum has them.
I would much, much rather be associated with E.W. Bullinger than Darby. Before Bullinger, no one preached the 2nd Coming. His lecture series at Oxford was the first on the subject, as far as I know. On the other hand, Darby's claim to fame is that he was the first to preach the heretical pre-trib rapture theory.
Acts 2 dispensationalism is essentially fundamentalism without the Gospels. Very milky.
Without Josephus/Russell, there would be no "Full Preterism....Partial Preterism....(fill in the blank of its numerous flavors)."
Since you fraud Preterists cannot agree, it is a false, fraud, "invented" "doctrine.
QED. You taught us that, little arms Craigie. We learned that from you.
Let us know when you Buddhist mystic Preterists, and closet Catholics, have your act together.
How long have you been a bible rejecting "Errors Only-ist?"