ECT Are we born sinless? Pelagianism and semi-pelagianism

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Are you certain? If Jesus is the same today, yesterday and forever... wouldn't it be fair to say that His statement that "Only God is good" reaches into eternity?

That is the only thing that statement is getting at, his nature. Because he did change. He became flesh, he died, he was raised up into a glorified body. His nature during all was only righteous. He always abhors evil. etc etc.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Haven't read all prior posts, so forgive me if this has been touched upon (I'm going largely off the recent scripture compendium given for both sides)

What of the fact given that God is no respecter of persons? Paul hammerd the point home at various points. Don't children fall under the supertype of persons?

Of course the LORD treats all men the same way. Adam did not die spiritually until he sinned and therefore no one is dead spiritually until they sin. In order for all to die spiritually all must first be alive spiritually.

The only way that could possible happen is because all emerge from the womb spiritually alive.

Thanks for reminding us that the LORD is no respecter of persons.
 

Shasta

Well-known member
Again, let us look at this verse and wecan see that "all men" die spiritually when they sin:

All righteous people before and after the Cross have been born again. They will all enter the kingdom and no one can enter the kingdom unless they are born again.

Before I start with those other matters let us look at this. To be clear, you are saying that righteous individuals like Abraham were born again by the Spirit during the time they were on earth.

If this is what you are saying what is the textual basis for such a claim?
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Before I start with those other matters let us look at this. To be clear, you are saying that righteous individuals like Abraham were born again by the Spirit during the time they were on earth.

If this is what you are saying what is the textual basis for such a claim?

According to the Lord Jesus no one will enter the kingdom unless they are born again. The Scriptures reveal that Abraham will indeed enter the kingdom so common sense dictates that he was born again.

In fact, while Abraham walked the earth he received the imputed righteousness which is of God (Ro.4:3) so it is ridiculous to imagine that he remained dead spiritually at that time.

Or perhaps you want to argue that Abraham was righteous in the eyes of the LORD at the same time when he was dead spiritually?
 

Shasta

Well-known member
According to the Lord Jesus no one will enter the kingdom unless they are born again. The Scriptures reveal that Abraham will indeed enter the kingdom so common sense dictates that he was born again.

In fact, while Abraham walked the earth he received the imputed righteousness which is of God (Ro.4:3) so it is ridiculous to imagine that he remained dead spiritually at that time.

Or perhaps you want to argue that Abraham was righteous in the eyes of the LORD at the same time when he was dead spiritually?

So there is no textual evidence in the OT that anyone was born again by the Spirit. You have just assumed that because it seems to you like it ought to have been that way.

Your assumption then is that everyone who would enter the Kingdom in the future must have been ready to do so during their lifetime on earth...but the scriptures say many looked to future realities they did not experience:

13 All these people died in faith, without having received the things they were promised. However, they saw them and welcomed them from afar. And they acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth (Hebrews 11:13).

Another assumption you are making is that Abraham walked with God in the exact way as a New Testament believer. Evidently the gift of the Spirit to believers was not a direct result of the death burial and resurrection of Jesus. Rather, the Spirit had always been available for anyone who was righteous enough to walk with God even without their first having to be made clean through the blood of the Lamb.

When you speak of "imputed righteousness" it sounds like modern "justification theology?" Isn't that scripture just saying God saw Abraham's faith as a good thing? Also, Abraham had obedient faith. That is what James pointed out.
 

Evil.Eye.<(I)>

BANNED
Banned
Good question, obviously I must clarify what I said. As I John clearly points out, we do sin, but, do we sin to the degree and frequency that we did before? That is, can we lie to one another less? Can we quit stealing? Ephesians 4:28 and replace that stealing with something else? Can we learn to be more spiritually minded and less carnally minded? Can we do what Romans 12:11 says, not slothful in business, fervent in spirit, serving the Lord? If we can, and God's word states clearly that we can, we should get busy doing theses things and attend to doing God's word and will instead of man's word and will.

We most certainly can learn to walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing for God's word exhorts us to do so.

Yet we will not reach a state of sinless perfection until

I Thessalonians 4:13-18,

But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.

14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.

15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.

I Corinthians 13:10-12

But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.,

and I John 3:1-3

Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.

Can we purify ourselves? Yes we can.

Will we achieve total purity by our efforts? No, but as I John 3:2b states,

but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

So, we will sin, but will we decide to remain carnally minded and sin as before or will be work to become spiritually minded and improve our lives according to what God desires for us to do?

Generally, we can handle one major issue at a time, in one moment. Maybe we are working on Ephesians 4:28, we can concentrate on that because we see that is a real issue in our lives, but can we concentrate on that and do all the other truths we should be doing all at the same moment? No, we must prioritize and work on the big issues, as we are improving in that area, we will find ourselves still messing up in some other areas.

But we take heart for light dispels darkness and we can lighten up the dark corners of our hearts and lives though we may only be able to do so one corner at at time, (doing it well and throughly)

I am a rabid dog when it come to any form of works intertwined with salvation and I am "merciless" at identifying people who utilize Christ's imputed Righteousness as a tool to hide the fact that we all "sin". I forever acknowledge the trade and know that Jesus declares me "sinless" by faith and the removal of the law from my life.

Well... Oats... I can't disagree with a word you have written here and find it edifying on a massive level.

All of Christ's Love, Grace and Guidence in all of your life, studies and relationships!

All gratitude for your sincerity,

- EE
 

Evil.Eye.<(I)>

BANNED
Banned
That is the only thing that statement is getting at, his nature. Because he did change. He became flesh, he died, he was raised up into a glorified body. His nature during all was only righteous. He always abhors evil. etc etc.

And oh what a Perfect, Loving, Just, Merciful... insert a trillion descriptive words of wonder... Nature He Has!
 

Shasta

Well-known member
I wasn't referring to where we disagree. I was talking about your "speculations" of what Jerry might claim next. It was those that made you look ignorant.

I think some of his premises inevitably lead to conclusions that he himself would probably not agree with. Taking a premise to its logical conclusion is one way of testing the validity of the premise. Many times people have tested my beliefs this way and, when they do, I try to answer as best I can. I have been having extensive discussions with Jerry and am not completely in the dark about what he will say. If he disagrees he is capable of explaining himself
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
“For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment;”
??2 Peter? ?2:4? ?ESV??
http://bible.com/59/2pe.2.4.esv


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

Yes, I know what you think that means. It's actually talking about how even the angels are subject to God's judgment. Do you think no angels rebelled before they saw those beauties on earth? Sorry, that's just conjecture....nothing more.
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
I think some of his premises inevitably lead to conclusions that he himself would probably not agree with. Taking a premise to its logical conclusion is one way of testing the validity of the premise. Many times people have tested my beliefs this way and, when they do, I try to answer as best I can. I have been having extensive discussions with Jerry and am not completely in the dark about what he will say. If he disagrees he is capable of explaining himself

Yes he can, and I can point out when I see you making assumptions before you even understand what he's saying. For instance, he asked you if you knew the difference between being spiritually alive and being indwelt by the Holy Spirit. I thought that was the perfect opportunity for you to respond to what he was actually saying, but you appeared to ignore it.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
Evidently the gift of the Spirit to believers was not a direct result of the death burial and resurrection of Jesus. Rather, the Spirit had always been available for anyone who was righteous enough to walk with God even without their first having to be made clean through the blood of the Lamb.

People were being made alive spiritually at the time the Lord Jesus walked the earth, as witnessed by His words here:

"It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life" (Jn.6:63).​

Those who heard and believed His words received eternal life the moment when they believed and they were passed from death unto life (Jn.5:24). And they were made alive by the Spirit. The promise was realized at the time when a person believed His words. The Greek words translated "speak" and "they are" and "they are" are all in the "present" tense. The believers received spiritual life at the moment when they believed. And that completely destroys your idea that no one received spiritual life until after the Cross.

Your assumption then is that everyone who would enter the Kingdom in the future must have been ready to do so during their lifetime on earth...but the scriptures say many looked to future realities they did not experience

Are you so uninformed that you do not even realize that men are "born of God" when they believe?:

"Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God...And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you"
(1 Pet.1:23,25).​

it is those who believe God who are born again. And Paul makes it plain that Abraham believed God:

"For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness" (Ro.4:3-50.​

According to your ideas even though Abraham's faith was counted for righteousness he remained dead spiritually. Instead of accepting this truth you say this about Abraham:

When you speak of "imputed righteousness" it sounds like modern "justification theology?" Isn't that scripture just saying God saw Abraham's faith as a good thing? Also, Abraham had obedient faith. That is what James pointed out.

No, that is not what the Scriptures are saying. Have you never read the following words of Paul in regard to Abraham's imputed righteousness?:

"And therefore it was imputed to him (Abraham) for righteousness. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification"
(Ro.4:22-25).​

Does that not "sound" like modern "justification theology"? Of course it is!

But according to your ideas Abraham received the imputed righteousness which is of God but he remained spiritually dead!
 
Top