God's Truth
New member
There is a major difference in saying Jesus had a Spirit from God versus Jesus' Spirit is the Spirit of God.It is only different wording; the meaning is the same. The man Jesus who's spirit was of GOD and the Holy Spirit was not the fullness there of as the man grew along with the spirit. If He was in the utter fullness of the Spirit then the spirit would not have been able to grow, nor would it have needed to. His spirit was the Holy Spirit ever as He was boy/man; bit the Spirit was not limited to Him and so He wasn't in the fullness there of to me.
It does not mean the same thing.
Jesus was fully God's Spirit come as a Man.How does a thing at full capacity grow?
If one comes as a human, one must start from a baby in the womb and grow into a Man.
Glad to hear you say that.The spirit of the man Jesus is too the spirit of GOD. I see no real need for further division past that simple pertinent truth.
I cannot say definitively that Jesus as man had a separate spirit than the Holy Spirit.
See that is why you cause confusion on what you believe. You just said the spirit of the Man Jesus is the Spirit of God; but now you say you cannot say. That type of talk causes confusion.
No, it would not be conjecture. It is scripture. Many scriptures show that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Spirit.I could see how, but to surmise such due to mere possibility is, well.... conjecture.
No. It means he did not live to please his FLESH.The spirit of GOD was in Christ leading Him. He denied temptation, yet GOD cannot be tempted. It seems to support that He denied His spirit as it was able to be tempted,
and he followed the Holy Spirit, not falling into temptation giving place for sin.
I really do not see the point in arguing over it.
You can't argue about it because you are not settled in the truth about it.
We see it the same as it pertains to us now at this time. Why fight or debate over what is of no help to any?
Shame on you.
You just said it was conjecture.Christ is the spirit of GOD. Is that not what matters?
His words are life everlasting. Does that not take precedence over who we claim He was as a man 2000 years ago?
You should not judge the topic as unnecessary, or unhelpful, just because you have no idea.