God's Truth
New member
You thought your false Catholic religion brought something wonderful to the world with the false trinity doctrine.
Your Catholic church is a haunt for evil spirits.
ECT Why shouldn't I convert from Evangelical Protestant to Catholic?
- Thread starter RichRock
- Start date
You thought your false Catholic religion brought something wonderful to the world with the false trinity doctrine.
Your Catholic church is a haunt for evil spirits.
A warning for you has been requested to the mods. I wont tolerate your filthy mouth any longer lady.
To everyone else, please feel free to complain to the mods also, three warnings results in a ban I believe.
Go to her post, top right of her post is a red button, click and input reason, send, done.
Last edited:
Saved.One.by.Grace
New member
I'd rather put people on Ignore than have them banned. Banning is taking away their first amendment rights. I have the person in question on Ignore.
The perpetual virginity dogma was a lie.
Augustine did not teach eternal damnation; that was Aquinas' job. The Latin and Greek documents do not describe unending punishment in hell without mistranslation.
No, post yours without laming out. The catholic church does also teach both limbo and unending torment. You guys are aren't consistent enough to pretend or rather usurp the older East Orthodox church.
That same site has common Roman Catholic lies about the masonic lodge. Considering how the Catholic and British elite used the masons to provoke a civil war, they don't [want] their membership in there.
Last edited:
Cruciform
New member
- Your complete inability to provide any substantive response to Post #953 is noted.
- Also, as they come from a non-Christian, your opinions here amount to exactly nothing.
Cruciform
New member
So, then, you have no actual proof whatsoever. That's what I thought.
Post your proof.
So, then, you have no actual proof whatsoever. That's what I thought.
Limbo, no; eternal punishment, yes. Get your facts straight.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Cruciform
New member
:darwinsm:... Thanks, I really needed that.
Just so we're all clear, the following is what you're calling evil, correct?
1626 The Church holds the exchange of consent between the spouses to be the indispensable element that makes the marriage. If consent is lacking there is no marriage.
1628 The consent must be an act of the will of each of the contracting parties, free of coercion or grave external fear. No human power can substitute for this consent. If this freedom is lacking the marriage is invalid.
1629 For this reason (or for other reasons that render the marriage null and void) the Church, after an examination of the situation by the competent ecclesiastical tribunal, can declare the nullity of a marriage, i.e., that the marriage never existed.
Catechism of the Catholic Church
1628 The consent must be an act of the will of each of the contracting parties, free of coercion or grave external fear. No human power can substitute for this consent. If this freedom is lacking the marriage is invalid.
1629 For this reason (or for other reasons that render the marriage null and void) the Church, after an examination of the situation by the competent ecclesiastical tribunal, can declare the nullity of a marriage, i.e., that the marriage never existed.
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Fail.
Jehovah's Witness' history lessons based on FACT never were their strong point lol. :dunce:
journey
New member
TOL is a privately owned and operated forum, and there is no right to be here. Further, there are no first amendment rights here. Continued membership and posting here is contingent on obeying the forum rules. I doubt this specific case will result in a warning, but I don't speak for the administration of TOL.
You need to refresh yourself on the rules here. Your not liking what someone says is not a banable offense.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=55933
Ok. Sure. Wouldn't want to see a repeat of you and GT though (ducks head)...
....or maybe I would opcorn:http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93176&page=225
Ok. Sure. Wouldn't want to see a repeat of you and GT though (ducks head)...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93176&page=225
Your point with a post from over a year ago with a woman i placed on ignore and remains there to this day? I was offering you advice, since you can be banned yourself for making reports that are not violations of the rules and you were asking others to do the same. So please continue since you dont need any help
Sheila B
Member
Perhaps I am saying that Jesus never promised me or you or anyone else the Keys to the Kingdom.
So please continue since you dont need any help
I see irony was lost on you.
For your reference it was at the end of GT's thread.
Your permission for me to continue with the thread is not really necessary, but thanks none the less.
I dont care what you do with a year old thread where i put the person on ignore and left them there, and apparently you dont want to do that, but ive noted not to give you any advice in the future
I am seeking and finding the truth, thank you.