Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
...can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?

Are you repeating a bad question because its tough to type when running with your tail between your legs?

Care to discuss the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS ...Dante?

Although Ex-President Clinton declared AIDS, particularly in Africa, to be a national security threat to the U.S., it turns out that AIDS in Africa -- which doesn't even require an HIV test to diagnose -- may be a very different condition than AIDS in America.
Evidence shows that "AIDS" in Africa is just a new description of many age-old diseases common to nations in misery and war with starvation, wrecked economies and ruined public health services. HIV tests, essential to any diagnosis of AIDS in the United States, aren't even given in Africa, except to tiny samples of the population.

For Africa, there is the "Bangui Definition." Decided upon at a World Health Organization meeting in October, 1985, it's almost never mentioned in major media alarms about exploding AIDS cases.

The meeting was organized by an official of the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Joseph McCormick. He explains in his book, "Level 4, Virus Hunters of the CDC," "... no virus tests suited to widespread use, yet existed. ... We needed a set of guidelines ... The definition has proven useful in areas where no testing is available."

Indeed, the definition served to explode the number of "AIDS cases." Panic stories began to abound of entire populations at risk with 30 or 40 percent rates of infection and "22.5 million victims now infected with HIV." (Boston Globe, Oct. 10, 1999)

To have AIDS, according to the Bengui Definition, the patient must have two of these three symptoms: "prolonged fevers for a month or more, weight loss over 10 percent, or prolonged diarrhea," combined with any one of several minor symptoms -- chronically swollen lymph nodes, persistent cough for more than a month, persistent herpes, itching skin inflammation or several others.

But many of these symptoms show up from other African diseases, now vastly spread because of the political chaos. Poor sanitation, poverty, malnutrition and parasitic diseases were always common and are now endemic. In America, AIDS is a name for 30-odd diseases found together with a positive test for HIV antibodies. Consequently, being HIV positive is the requirement for a diagnosis of AIDS in the U.S.

In addition, there's even a credibility problem with such HIV testing as it is done. The U.S. Government's CDC report, "HIV, AIDS, and Reproductive Health," explains on page 99 "the high rate of false-positive screening tests" and the need for subsequent confirmatory tests. It also states, "All HIV testing is subject to error and laboratory workers with less experience have high rates of false results."

False positive test results with the common HIV ELISA tests can come from many causes, including pregnancy and diseases endemic to poverty-stricken Africa, such as malaria, tuberculosis and leprosy. The Western Blot is a more precise follow-up test, but expensive and rarely done in Africa.

Test results derived from small, infected groups are extrapolated to include whole populations in Africa. In 1994, an article in the Journal of Infectious Diseases concluded that HIV tests were useless in central Africa because the prevalence of these microbes caused a 70 percent false positive rate.

Read more: http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/africa.html

17.gif

http://www.altheal.org/statistics/slides/17.gif
 

MrDante

New member
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
...can you explain why westernized societies which embrace pornography, out of wedlock sex, adultery and abortion aren't infected by HIV/AIDS, and African countries whose laws and cultural mores' don't glorify the above are?



Care to discuss the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS ...Dante?
Why? I mean other than a sad attempt on your part to use a 20 year old clipping to try to keep up the pretense that your lie is still somehow viable?
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
A note to JudgeRightly:

I see that you reported ...Dante for posting a picture that is "pornographic in nature". Granted, this is a Christian website, but also remember that you're in a thread that deals with the reality of sexual perversion and immoral sexual practices, so unsavory subjects will be shown and discussed.

The left (liberal and Libertarian) are notorious for silencing their opposition. I silence the opposition via the truth, not banning them.

Please respect my wishes and allow open debate.

Thanks,
aCW

Of course.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Care to discuss the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS ...Dante?

Why? I mean other than a sad attempt on your part to use a 20 year old clipping to try to keep up the pretense that your lie is still somehow viable?

I'm not aware of any revisions made to the Banqui Definition. If there have been, please enlighten the followers of this thread with that information.

If not, I guess I'll just have to put "my tail between my legs" and...

move on.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I'd shown in earlier posts during the Presidential primaries how some Trump supporters would rough up people who spoke out against their beloved moral degenerate leader (Donald the Degenerate even offered to pay the legal fees of at least one such individual).

It appears that a couple of Trump supporters took that violence to another level:

Gay rights activist claims he was raped by an American man in Marseille who shouted: 'You French people hate Trump'*
Man, 35,*says he was drugged at a bar on Friday by two men
He says they then took him to a hotel in Marseille
He claims his wrists and ankles were tied with ripped up bedsheets*

March 14, 2017

A gay rights activist, who moved to France to escape persecution, claims he was raped by an American man in Marseille who said 'you French people hate Trump'.
The 35-year-old says he was drugged at a bar on Friday by two men who were American and English, who then took him to a hotel room.
The LGBT activist claims the American said: 'You French people…you hate Trump. And you listen to black and Arabic music.'
He told a news website his alleged attackers beat him and tied his wrists and ankles with ripped up bedsheets...
Speaking of the attack he said: 'One of them went out and the other gave me a punch in the face, then raped me.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vist-claims-raped-American.html#ixzz4bVE8301n

download-658x357.jpg

http://biznet.co.tz/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/download-658x357.jpg

I wonder if rock em sock em Donald will offer to pay these two boyz legal fees?
 

MrDante

New member
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Care to discuss the "Bangui Definition" of AIDS ...Dante?



I'm not aware of any revisions made to the Banqui Definition. If there have been, please enlighten the followers of this thread with that information.

If not, I guess I'll just have to put "my tail between my legs" and...

move on.

well considering you couldn't get the diagnostic criteria or the usage protocols correct that is hardly surprising.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly

Of course.

So you report the posting of an actual book cover but obscene Photoshops pictures supposedly of pride events...meh? Once again you demonstrate your personal integrity or lack thereof.

In all fairness to JudgeRightly: In a righteous, God-fearing society, those who promote immoral behavior and sexual perversion would be silenced through the criminal justice system (i.e. you wouldn't have the so-called 'freedom' to promote your sexual anarchist agenda).

But since we're not living in a righteous, God-fearing society, I've asked him to hold off on having promoters of sexual deviancy banned so that people who believe in God and decency can see what they're up against.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm not aware of any revisions made to the Banqui Definition. If there have been, please enlighten the followers of this thread with that information.

well considering you couldn't get the diagnostic criteria or the usage protocols correct that is hardly surprising.

Unless any revision(s) made to the Banqui Defintion were hidden somewhere in that sentence, I'm going assume that the 1985 definition for AIDS still stands.

17.gif

http://www.altheal.org/statistics/slides/17.gif
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly

Of course.



In all fairness to JudgeRightly: In a righteous, God-fearing society, those who promote immoral behavior and sexual perversion would be silenced through the criminal justice system (i.e. you wouldn't have the so-called 'freedom' to promote your sexual anarchist agenda).

But since we're not living in a righteous, God-fearing society, I've asked him to hold off on having promoters of sexual deviancy banned so that people who believe in God and decency can see what they're up against.
You may be interested in this:

https://tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=...&share_tid=122834&share_fid=4230&share_type=t
An Advocation of Government

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
In all fairness to JudgeRightly: In a righteous, God-fearing society, those who promote immoral behavior and sexual perversion would be silenced through the criminal justice system (i.e. you wouldn't have the so-called 'freedom' to promote your sexual anarchist agenda).

But since we're not living in a righteous, God-fearing society, I've asked him to hold off on having promoters of sexual deviancy banned so that people who believe in God and decency can see what they're up against.

You may be interested in this:

An Advocation of Government
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?122834-An-Advocation-of-Government

I don't know if you recall, but you and I had a pretty extensive debate on that subject in another thread, which I believe motivated you to start the one above.

I made a post on page 6, which I don't believe you responded to.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...f-Government&p=4920050&viewfull=1#post4920050

It doesn't get any better than a biblical based representative constitutional republic where it's citizens' rights come from God.
 

MrDante

New member
Quote Originally Posted by JudgeRightly

Of course.



In all fairness to JudgeRightly: In a righteous, God-fearing society, those who promote immoral behavior and sexual perversion would be silenced through the criminal justice system (i.e. you wouldn't have the so-called 'freedom' to promote your sexual anarchist agenda).

But since we're not living in a righteous, God-fearing society, I've asked him to hold off on having promoters of sexual deviancy banned so that people who believe in God and decency can see what they're up against.
It's nice to think that there is a possible world where you are silenced.
 

MrDante

New member
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm not aware of any revisions made to the Banqui Definition. If there have been, please enlighten the followers of this thread with that information.



Unless any revision(s) made to the Banqui Defintion were hidden somewhere in that sentence, I'm going assume that the 1985 definition for AIDS still stands.

17.gif

http://www.altheal.org/statistics/slides/17.gif

this isn't the Banqui Definition.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
In all fairness to JudgeRightly: In a righteous, God-fearing society, those who promote immoral behavior and sexual perversion would be silenced through the criminal justice system (i.e. you wouldn't have the so-called 'freedom' to promote your sexual anarchist agenda).

But since we're not living in a righteous, God-fearing society, I've asked him to hold off on having promoters of sexual deviancy banned so that people who believe in God and decency can see what they're up against.



I don't know if you recall, but you and I had a pretty extensive debate on that subject in another thread, which I believe motivated you to start the one above.

I made a post on page 6, which I don't believe you responded to.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...f-Government&p=4920050&viewfull=1#post4920050

It doesn't get any better than a biblical based representative constitutional republic where it's citizens' rights come from God.
Replied. I think I was going to reply, but never got around to it.

Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
It doesn't get any better than a biblical based representative constitutional republic where it's citizens' rights come from God.

Replied. I think I was going to reply, but never got around to it.

I'll show the flaws of your proposed monarchy in your thread.

That being said: Since I've exposed the African AIDS hoax without anyone coming forward to show that it isn't, I'll leave that subject behind andI delve into another topic that I've been holding off on:

The history of American (public) education.

With you being homeschooled, I look forward to your input. Be forewarned though, it wasn't homeschooling that made America great, it was a specific book that was used and referenced so very often that did.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Liberal/Libertarian policies are coming back to haunt those who embrace them, but unfortunately, they won't admit to it.

Case in point (from the ultra liberal Seattle periodical 'The Stranger') :

Golden Gardens Jogger Demands Anti-Trans Group Retract Fundraising Effort Using Her Story

March 14, 2017

Anti-trans activists in Washington State have been trying to tell cisgender women for more than a year that we ought to be afraid of transgender people using the bathroom. This is the main marketing behind I-1552, a proposed ballot initiative from anti-trans group Just Want Privacy that attempts to repeal state anti-discrimination protections for trans people and mandate that public schools keep trans students out of bathrooms that correspond with their gender.

But it appears that Just Want Privacy's latest fear-mongering effort has backfired. Last week, the group tried to use the story of Kelly Herron, a local marathoner who was allegedly attacked by a man in a Golden Gardens bathroom, to promote their anti-trans ballot measure in a fundraising e-mail and on Facebook. Unfortunately for Just Want Privacy, Herron has now spoken out against their campaign.

"To the people behind I-1552, I say 'not today,...,'" Herron said in a public statement today about Just Want Privacy's attempts to use her story, repeating the words she says she screamed at her attacker. "I refuse to allow anyone to use me and my horrific sexual assault to cause harm and discrimination to others."

According to charges filed last week by King County prosecutors, Herron was attacked in a public Golden Gardens bathroom on March 5 by Gary Steiner, a 40-year-old registered sex offender from Arizona. Herron, who had recently taken a self-defense class, was successfully able to fight off her attacker and lock him in the bathroom until police arrived, the charges say.

"I fought for my life screaming("Not today,...!"), clawing his face, punching back, and desperately trying to escape his grip- never giving up," Herron wrote in an Instagram post following the alleged attack.

On March 9, Just Want Privacy sent an e-mail to its supporters with a picture of Herron's bloody face. "Sadly, what happened to Kelly is hardly rare," Just Want Privacy's communications director Kaeley Triller Haver wrote. "Each week yields new stories of deviant men who found ways to access female's vulnerable spaces in order to exploit them."

The e-mail continued: "The current rule in Washington grants males unrestricted access to women's spaces, provided they use just four words: 'I identify as non-binary.' Or fluid. Or demigender. Or pangender. Or gender gifted. Or anything they want to declare themselves other than male. Anything goes."

Read more: http://www.thestranger.com/slog/201...up-retract-fundraising-effort-using-her-story

timthumb.php

http://indilens.com/wp-content/them...ea-433c-accd-a1d91627252b.jpg&q=90&w=619&zc=1

Here's an important question for transgender activists (the "T" in the LGBTQ acronym) :

Wouldn't it be considered 'policing a women's restroom/locker room/fitting room' if when someone who observed what they thought was a male enter a women's restroom, locker room or fitting room, confronted him and asked:

"Do you identify as non-binary, or fluid, or demigender, or pangender or gender gifted?"


I haven't been able to find anything in the Revised Code of Washington or at the Washington State Human Rights Commission where it's states that people of the opposite sex have to use a disclaimer when entering the restroom, locker room or fitting room different than that of their biological sex, in fact the pro LGBTQ Lambda Legal writes this:

Transgender refers to people whose gender identity, one’s inner sense of being male, female or something else, differs from their assigned or presumed sex at birth (cisgender refers to people whose gender identity is the same as their assigned or presumed sex at birth). Gender-nonconforming people don’t meet society’s expectations of gender roles. For transgender and gender-nonconforming people, even just walking through the door of a public restroom can be a stressful, scary experience. The mere possibility of hostile remarks from other restroom goers, questions from store owners or mall security or arbitrary restrictions from employers can be so frightening that many just “hold it.”

TGNC people get harassed in other situations too, but public restrooms tend to invite extra scrutiny based on comparisons to stereotypes about how men and women are supposed to look or act.

The solution is quite simple, in theory: Everyone should use the restroom that matches who they are, regardless of whether they are making a gender transition or appear gendernonconforming
.
http://www.lambdalegal.org/know-your-rights/article/trans-restroom-access-rights

According to Lambda Legal, just asking a male entering a women's restroom a question about his gender identity could be extremely offensive (and in today's society we wouldn't want to offend anyone).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top