Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[alwight]

Randomly enforced at best (why was Harvey Milk not prosecuted for having sex with underage teens?).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/17/harvey-milk-stamp-matt-barber-_n_4117311.html

Indoctrinating the minds of innocent children and exposing them to lewd behavior once was illegal too Al (I've shown enough pictures of exhibitionists exposing themselves to children at gay pride parades).

As I've mentioned many times before: Almost every single objective in the original 1972 homosexual agenda has been enacted, except for this one:

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent. (1972 State-7)
http://afaofpa.org/archives/1972-gay-rights-platform/

Then your fight is with certain gay activists and the enforcers of existing laws, not generally with consenting homosexual adults, who don't deserve to be criminalised for what they may do together in private.

 

[GFR7]

aCW, I see you are deliberately ignoring what this ex-gay counselor and Sunday school teacher from Kentucky did to this boy: :AMR1:

The pastor at Polly Ann Church of God insisted to WKYT that Murphy had only been a Sunday school teacher, and that the boy was a student in his class. The pastor said that the church was dealing with the situation internally. He also argued that there was no reason to believe that any abuse occurred on church grounds.

Murphy was arrested on Monday on charges of first-degree sexual abuse, use of a minor under 18 in a sexual performance, and third-degree sodomy.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/...talks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

 

[alwight]

There may be some claiming to be "ex-gay" but there are rather more "ex-ex-gays" it seems.

 

[GFR7]

There may be some claiming to be "ex-gay" but there are rather more "ex-ex-gays" it seems.

NOT a good track record. And this man took advantage of the whole concept.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior View Post
Randomly enforced at best (why was Harvey Milk not prosecuted for having sex with underage teens?).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4117311.html

Indoctrinating the minds of innocent children and exposing them to lewd behavior once was illegal too Al (I've shown enough pictures of exhibitionists exposing themselves to children at gay pride parades).

As I've mentioned many times before: Almost every single objective in the original 1972 homosexual agenda has been enacted, except for this one:

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent. (1972 State-7)
http://afaofpa.org/archives/1972-gay-rights-platform/

Then your fight is with certain gay activists and the enforcers of existing laws, not generally with consenting homosexual adults, who don't deserve to be criminalised for what they may do together in private.

Remember Al that since homosexuality was decriminalized, those who engage in homosexual behavior (and sexual anarchists in general, i.e. abortionists and pornographers) became organized and formed a "collective" where they vote in politicians that represent their perverted and immoral interests. Indoctrinating children to accept homosexuality (and sexual perversion in general) as something 'normal' is of great value to the sodomite movement, as they are the future generation that will keep this movement going strong.

We've been over this numerous times Al, so quit playing naïve.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

aCW, I see you are deliberately ignoring what this ex-gay counselor and Sunday school teacher from Kentucky did to this boy: :AMR1:



http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/...talks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook

Since he still has a taste for little boys, I guess there is nothing "ex gay" about him is there?

Thanks for making my point that homosexuality and pedophilia/pederasty go hand in hand (even though that was not your intention).

 

[aCultureWarrior]

In redneck Christian engagement news:

John Luke Robertson, 19, the grandson of Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson, is engaged to 12 year old Mary Kate McEacharn.

Ok, she's not 12, but it was fun messing with Art Brain.

While Ms. McEacharn's age isn't revealed, she does appear to be of legal age to wed.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...-luke-engaged-19th-birthday-article-1.1972533

What's so disturbing about this story is that they're so young! Doesn't John Luke know that he should spend a few years sowing his wild oats, i.e. go out and get a few girls pregnant, have a few chillens out of wedlock, before he decides to settle down?

Doesn't Mary Kate know that it's better for her to sleep around with a few different guys, have an abortion or 3, shack up with a guy or two and then decide if marriage is right for her?

Sheesh, redneck Christians theses days. What's the world coming to?

 

[GFR7]

In redneck Christian engagement news:

John Luke Robertson, 19, the grandson of Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson, is engaged to 12 year old Mary Kate McEacharn.

Ok, she's not 12, but it was fun messing with Art Brain.

While Ms. McEacharn's age isn't revealed, she does appear to be of legal age to wed.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...-luke-engaged-19th-birthday-article-1.1972533

What's so disturbing about this story is that they're so young! Doesn't John Luke know that he should spend a few years sowing his wild oats, i.e. go out and get a few girls pregnant, have a few chillens out of wedlock, before he decides to settle down?

Doesn't Mary Kate know that it's better for her to sleep around with a few different guys, have an abortion or 3, shack up with a guy or two and then decide if marriage is right for her?

Sheesh, redneck Christians theses days. What's the world coming to?

I think it's good that they're marrying young. :AMR1:

 

[alwight]

Remember Al that since homosexuality was decriminalized, those who engage in homosexual behavior (and sexual anarchists in general, i.e. abortionists and pornographers) became organized and formed a "collective" where they vote in politicians that represent their perverted and immoral interests. Indoctrinating children to accept homosexuality (and sexual perversion in general) as something 'normal' is of great value to the sodomite movement, as they are the future generation that will keep this movement going strong.

We've been over this numerous times Al, so quit playing naïve.

You repeating stuff doesn't make it any more correct aCW.
Right wing Christians were already well organised against gays in the old days, in this life now and perhaps, who knows, even the next, so quit bleating when they give back what they get and it sticks in your craw. lain:

 

[GFR7]

Since he still has a taste for little boys, I guess there is nothing "ex gay" about him is there?

Thanks for making my point that homosexuality and pedophilia/pederasty go hand in hand (even though that was not your intention).

I don't think it was right for this man to wrap himself in the cloak of Christianity and ex-gay therapy to violate this minor. That was the point I was making.

 

[GFR7]

What do you think of this, aCW? :think:

This is why using the disease model is not the best strategy - and the focus on gay marriage having harmful secondary effects on society and future generations may be a stronger one.

This drug has been tested in both the UK and the US, and would allow even gay men engaging in risky sex to vastly reduce their risk of getting HIV, simply by taking this one preventative pill - called 'Prep' by its commercial name - daily:

U.S. trials found taking Truvada daily reduced the risk of HIV by 92%


'Wonder drug' which can reduce HIV risk by 92% could be offered on the NHS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...nhs-landmark-trial-sped-up.html#ixzz3GPjAAABZ


http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/prep/

http://i-base.info/uk-proud-study-to-provide-prep-earlier-than-expected/

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since he still has a taste for little boys, I guess there is nothing "ex gay" about him is there?

Thanks for making my point that homosexuality and pedophilia/pederasty go hand in hand (even though that was not your intention).

I don't think it was right for this man to wrap himself in the cloak of Christianity and ex-gay therapy to violate this minor. That was the point I was making.

Being that the homosexual pedophile/pederast wasn't an "ex-gay counselor" like you gave people the impression that he was in your above post:

(Originally Posted by GFR7
aCW, I see you are deliberately ignoring what this ex-gay counselor..)

but in fact is a homosexual who was "counseling" a child who was struggling with homosexual desires (i.e. grooming a young boy like homosexual pedophiles/pederasts do), once again you were being misleading.

But then that's what homosexualists like you do.

 

[GFR7]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since he still has a taste for little boys, I guess there is nothing "ex gay" about him is there?

Thanks for making my point that homosexuality and pedophilia/pederasty go hand in hand (even though that was not your intention).




Being that the homosexual pedophile/pederast wasn't an "ex-gay counselor" like you gave people the impression that he was in your above post:

(Originally Posted by GFR7
aCW, I see you are deliberately ignoring what this ex-gay counselor..)

but in fact is a homosexual who was "counseling" a child who was struggling with homosexual desires (i.e. grooming a young boy like homosexual pedophiles/pederasts do), once again you were being misleading.

But then that's what homosexualists like you do.

Well, he was affiliated with a Christian church and doing so under the guise of helping. If anyone was misleading, it was the gay news site, whose original title said that an "ex-gay counselor" has sodomized a boy in Kentucky. I see now that they have changed their title. I would agree they are a slippery bunch, but you are a fool to lump me in with them.
I was in no way trying to mislead. And you better not be implying anything else, either. .......... You should have seen the rant I just erased, as I read too fast and thought you had accused me of being like this perpetrator.....One never knows, though, with your double entendres..... :think:

And look at this title:

'Ex-Gay' Sunday School Teacher Confesses To Raping 16 Year Old Gay Boy He Told He Could 'Cure'

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/...ing-16-Year-Old-Gay-Boy-He-Told-He-Could-Cure

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Well, he was affiliated with a Christian church and doing so under the guise of helping.

Newsflash: Pedophiles/pederasts go where the children are.

If anyone was misleading, it was the gay news site, whose original title said that an "ex-gay counselor" has sodomized a boy in Kentucky.

Try reading the articles that you link.

I see now that they have changed their title. I would agree they are a slippery bunch, but you are a fool to lump me in with them.

Then I'll just keep on being a fool pumpkin.

I was in no way trying to mislead. And you better not be implying anything else, either. ..........

Or you're going to go on yet another one of your violent rampages?

 

[GFR7]

Newsflash: Pedophiles/pederasts go where the children are.



Try reading the articles that you link.



Then I'll just keep on being a fool pumpkin.



Or you're going to go on yet another one of your violent rampages?

I read most of them. :AMR1:

How violent? How can one be violent online? :think: ......... :AMR1:

In any case, someone make aCW stop with his false accusations!!!!!

And look at this title:

'Ex-Gay' Sunday School Teacher Confesses To Raping 16 Year Old Gay Boy He Told He Could 'Cure'

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/...ing-16-Year-Old-Gay-Boy-He-Told-He-Could-Cure

 

[GFR7]

I see you have NO comment on PRIDE Prep :AMR1: And I DID read that one

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Remember Al that since homosexuality was decriminalized, those who engage in homosexual behavior (and sexual anarchists in general, i.e. abortionists and pornographers) became organized and formed a "collective" where they vote in politicians that represent their perverted and immoral interests. Indoctrinating children to accept homosexuality (and sexual perversion in general) as something 'normal' is of great value to the sodomite movement, as they are the future generation that will keep this movement going strong.

We've been over this numerous times Al, so quit playing naïve.

You repeating stuff doesn't make it any more correct aCW. Right wing Christians were already well organised against gays in the old days, in this life now and perhaps, who knows, even the next, so quit bleating when they give back what they get and it sticks in your craw.

People and groups of people ("collectives") vote for politicians and political party platforms that match their ideology and often times their lifestyle.

It took a couple of posts (this time), but once again you are admitting it (aCW gives Al a patronizing pat on the head).

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Did I mention that the legalization of kiddy sex is the next thing on the homosexual/sexual anarchist agenda?

Watch child porn? That doesn't make you a pedophile, claims author John Grisham in astonishing attack on US judicial system.
The novelist and lawyer, 59, believes many men have been wrongly sent to prison after watching child porn online

Claims they 'would never touch a child' and have 'never harmed anybody'
References a friend of his who drunkenly watched child porn one night but was sent to prison after a FBI sting
Statements made in an extended interview with The Telegraph
Grisham maintained he has 'no sympathy for real pedophiles'

Oct. 15, 2014

Celebrated crime-fiction writer John Grisham has attacked America's judicial system for wrongly locking up men he believes 'accidentally' watched child pornography.
The best-selling author and lawyer - who penned novels like The Rainmaker, The Firm and The Pelican Brief - has given an astonishing interview to The Telegraph defending some child sex offenders, saying they have become victims of a legal system that has 'gone crazy'.
The 59-year-old then called for lighter sentences for those caught downloading images and videos of children being sexually abused.
'We have prisons now filled with guys my age. Sixty-year-old white men in prison who've never harmed anybody, would never touch a child,' Grisham told The Telegraph.
'But they got online one night and started surfing around, probably had too much to drink or whatever, and pushed the wrong buttons, went too far and got into child porn.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...hiles-astonishing-attack-judicial-system.html

Knowing that book sales could plummet if he gets the reputation of being a defender of pedophilia/pederasty, Johnny boy issues an apology:

John Grisham apologizes for remarks on child porn

Oct. 16, 2014

...Those comments and the nature in which Grisham discussed the very serious issue of child pornography incited a flood of hurt, disappointed and angry reactions from fans.

"The day that you came out in an interview and said that watchers of child porn get too stiff of a penalty for it (you said 10 years was too much) makes you someone that I cannot support nor no longer want to read," a reader named Kendra Benefield Lausman shared on Grisham's Facebook page; another posted that she's taken her entire Grisham library to her "burn barrel" with the intent to set the books on fire.

"How do you think child porn is made?" a poster named John Kelly asked on Grisham's page. "Someone is still getting hurt you imbecile. I'm sad to say that I will never purchase, nor consume, one of your books ever again. I am disgusted."

After the uproar began, Grisham issued an apology.

"Anyone who harms a child for profit or pleasure, or who in any way participates in child pornography -- online or otherwise -- should be punished to the fullest extent of the law," the author said in a statement. "My comments made two days ago during an interview with the British newspaper The Telegraph were in no way intended to show sympathy for those convicted of sex crimes, especially the sexual molestation of children. I can think of nothing more despicable. I regret having made these comments, and apologize to all."

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/16/showb...sip/john-grisham-child-pornography/index.html

Grisham is almost as good at backpedaling as our own GFR7 is.

 

[GFR7]

:think: Good GIF! :thumb:

HOWEVER:

Notice that Grisham had clearly referred to drunk old guys, who did not know what they were doing, clicked on the wrong links, unaware......

We know that the truly evil thing is the using of minors to produce porn.

I think that was his point: Let's lock up the roots of this thing, not drunken and confused people looking once (there should be nothing at all to look at in this venue).I cannot see where he was in any way excusing the making of child porn, nor the deliberate, sober acquisition of it. Not in any way.....

 

[alwight]

People and groups of people ("collectives") vote for politicians and political party platforms that match their ideology and often times their lifestyle.

It took a couple of posts (this time), but once again you are admitting it (aCW gives Al a patronizing pat on the head).

Just because there are right wing, apparently Christian based organisations for homophobic bigots to affiliate themselves with aCW, doesn't make all Christians homophobic bigots does it? Or perhaps you think that Christians too are a "collective"?