Why are liberals less happy than conservatives?

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Why are liberals less happy than conservatives?

Ambivalence about marriage and the family is bad for mental health​

Liberals, especially liberal women, are significantly less likely to be happy with their lives and satisfied with their “mental health”, compared to their conservative peers aged from 18-55.

This is the big takeaway from the 2022 American Family Survey, a striking new poll from YouGov and the Deseret News, which found that liberals are about 15 percentage points less likely to be “completely satisfied” with their lives.

1.jpeg


The survey goes on to find that liberals are about 18 percentage points less likely to be “completely satisfied” with their “mental health” than conservatives. But the problem appears to be especially acute for liberal women, who register the lowest levels of satisfaction with their lives and mental health. Indeed, only 15% of liberal women in the age group surveyed are “completely satisfied” with their lives, compared to 31% of conservative women; likewise, only 15% of liberal women are “completely satisfied” with their mental health, compared to 36% of conservative women.

2.jpeg


Two family factors have a lot to do with this ideological gap: marital status and family satisfaction. Given that conservatives aged 18-55 are about 20 percentage points more likely to be married, as well as 18 percentage points more likely to be satisfied with their families, the lesson here is obvious. Marriage and family are strongly linked to happiness and to personal mental health in particular.

3.jpeg


On the family front, conservative Americans (not politicians, admittedly) have a major advantage, in large part because they are more likely to embrace the family-first values and virtues that steer them towards wedlock and fulfilling family lives. This appears to be especially true here for conservative women, who report the highest levels of satisfaction with their family lives.

The problem facing liberals, then, is that too many of them have embraced the false narrative that the path to happiness runs counter to marriage and family life, not towards it. They think independence, freedom and work will make them happy, which is why significant portions of the popular media are filled these days with stories celebrating divorce and singleness. A recent story by Molly Smith in Bloomberg, for instance, falsely claimed that “Women Who Stay Single and Don’t Have Kids Are Getting Richer” (in reality, married mothers are richest) and spotlighted childless, single women who claim personal happiness: in the words of one, “I love my life and feel very fulfilled.”

The challenge for progressives is to understand and appreciate that these women are outliers. The secret to happiness, for most men and women, involves marriage and a life based around the family. The challenge for conservatives, of course, is to find new cultural platforms to communicate the value of marriage and family life to a young adult audience fleeing from the very way of life most likely to increase their odds of happiness.
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Because conservatives are content to shrug their shoulders and say they are happy with the way things are

You mean, for instance, like how conservatives are clearly happy and content having grifter-POTATUS Joseph Robbingus Blinden occupying/disgracing the White House and never want to see him leave? Isn't that "the way things are": Biden occupies the White House?

Are they not conservatives whom you Biden cheerleaders like to accuse of
insurrection, sedition and an attempted coup
while out of the other side of your mouth telling us "they are happy with the way things are"? Those two statements about conservatives don't jibe together, so what kind of sleight would you use to try to get people to think they can be harmonized together?

insurrection, sedition and an attempted coup = contentment with the present??​

liberals long for progress and change for the better.

Leftists (whom you like to call "liberals") only long for what they call "progress and change for the better," most if not all of which, being thus miscalled by them, is nothing any rationally-thinking, moral people could ever long for or be happy/content with or think to call "the better".
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
If by "progress" you mean progressing towards Sodom and Gomorrah I agree with you. The Groomer Party is surely achieving that.

I don't go for all of the gender and sexuality stuff myself but I can see why you'd like to blow up those issues as if that's all there is to being liberal. Gay, queer, trans, etc--my own view is that it's all of their business and none of mine. I'd rather not even know about it, but they're out there and will demand their rights just as surely as you or anyone else will. The hardest part of being a right-winger must be learning how to live and let live I guess.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
I don't go for all of the gender and sexuality stuff myself but I can see why you'd like to blow up those issues as if that's all there is to being liberal.
You forgot about sexually grooming children.

Gay, queer, trans, etc--my own view is that it's all of their business and none of mine.
It's none of your business if they want to sexually groom kids?

I'd rather not even know about it, but they're out there and will demand their rights just as surely as you or anyone else will.
Including their right to sexually groom kids, got it.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Last edited:

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
:sneaky: You can do better than that.
It was the Republican Party that created the "military-industrial complex," and it is Republicans who have led the drive to fund it to no end. Republicans gave us major wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Furthermore, the majority of people who comprise the military-industrial complex tend to be overwhelmingly pro-Republican in their politics.

It has become fashionable lately among those in the MAGA wing of the Republican Party to claim to be "antiwar," but nothing could be more ironic. MAGAts claim to be antiwar, but meanwhile, they assaulted the Capitol because a previous election did not go their way, and they are currently breathing threats of civil war if future elections don't go their way. "Anti-war" indeed!
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
It was the Republican Party that created the "military-industrial complex," and it is Republicans who have led the drive to fund it to no end. Republicans gave us major wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Furthermore, the majority of people who comprise the military-industrial complex tend to be overwhelmingly pro-Republican in their politics.

It has become fashionable lately among those in the MAGA wing of the Republican Party to claim to be "antiwar," but nothing could be more ironic. MAGAts claim to be antiwar, but meanwhile, they assaulted the Capitol because a previous election did not go their way, and they are currently breathing threats of civil war if future elections don't go their way. "Anti-war" indeed!
Quite. Given the amount of whining that's still going on with MAGA! nuts regarding the 2020 election results it's hard to imagine any of them being happy at all...
 

TomO

Get used to it.
Hall of Fame
It was the Republican Party that created the "military-industrial complex," and it is Republicans who have led the drive to fund it to no end. Republicans gave us major wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. Furthermore, the majority of people who comprise the military-industrial complex tend to be overwhelmingly pro-Republican in their politics.

It has become fashionable lately among those in the MAGA wing of the Republican Party to claim to be "antiwar," but nothing could be more ironic. MAGAts claim to be antiwar, but meanwhile, they assaulted the Capitol because a previous election did not go their way, and they are currently breathing threats of civil war if future elections don't go their way. "Anti-war" indeed!
:rolleyes: Please...I'm not even referring to any posturing by MAGA...I'm talking about the fact that the MIC owns the Democrats just as well. Your boy up there drooling into his bib in the Oval Office has never seen a war he wasn't totally stoked on engaging in.

The Republicans "created" the MIC?...Do you mean because Ike warned us about it?...Besides the whole MIC is run through Congress...Really?...Just dem war-mongering Republicans Huh? :ROFLMAO:

Give me a break...This isn't 1980, only an idiot or someone being facetious would use the "war-monger" label to try to draw a distinction between these two parties.

I guess you're right Doser.
😐
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
The Democrats are pushing for WW3, not the Republicans. They are the Groomer Party and the War Party, both.
Tulsi Gabbard Leaves The Democrat Party — “Elitist Cabal Of Warmongers”

Among other things, the Democrats are the warmonger party against children both in and out of the womb. Oh, also, aren't they the party of Little Boy and Fat Man—the party of the deployment of nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, to kill 135,000 Japanese people unnecessarily?
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
I'm talking about the fact that the MIC owns the Democrats just as well.
But everyone knows that. Everyone also knows that "peaceniks" are more likely to be found among liberals than among conservatives. Come to think of it, not at all among conservatives.

The Republicans "created" the MIC?...Do you mean because Ike warned us about it?...
Ike warned us about it because Ike created it. It was necessary at the time.

Besides the whole MIC is run through Congress...Really?...
Historically, Republicans have loved them some military funding, more than Democrats.

Just dem war-mongering Republicans Huh? :ROFLMAO:
Not hardly. But the history is undeniable.

Give me a break...This isn't 1980, only an idiot or someone being facetious would use the "war-monger" label to try to draw a distinction between these two parties.
History. Look it up.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
But everyone knows that. Everyone also knows that "peaceniks" are more likely to be found among liberals than among conservatives. Come to think of it, not at all among conservatives.
When the US voted to send $40 billion in weaponry to Ukraine, every single ‘no’ vote – 11 in the Senate and 57 in the House – came from a Republican. Not a single "peacenik" was a Democrat.
 
Last edited:
Top