You haven't looked like that since...what...1865?
toldailytopic: Do you think TOL bans members too frequently, or not frequently enough
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
You haven't looked like that since...what...1865?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It is not a strawman. :doh: You've been shown the context in which a deliberate misquote was illustrated. If you can't see the difference between an example and actual practice then it rests on you....
:dizzy:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
She knows it, AB. It's just a show because she can't produce the authority to support her peculiar notion about misquotation.
SD, it's like someone accusing you of lying and you say, "No, you're the President of the Moon!" to illustrate the absurdity of the claim. Then the other person says, "Aha! See, you're lying!"
Let the reader decide.
each:Right.
Um hmm.
Got it.
[SD: I don't dispute the fact that I have been banned.]
TH: "...[Y]ou can't dispute it."
[SD: I don't dispute it. :hammer:]
TH: "You can't."
Anything else?
summary
You endorse his "deliberate misquote" (your words not mine). I do not. He misquoted me before the example :freak: you believe we all needed. :dizzy: He made it clear at that time that has no intention of changing his behavior.
WizardofOz
New member
No. Produce the quote or you're a liar. It's really that simple.Let the reader decide.
Right.
Why announce that? It isn't a virtue to do what you must.
Sure. Produce the grammatical authority that agrees with your use of misquotation or withdraw it.Anything else?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yes I do given his reasoning and context for doing so. You were (and bafflingly still are) ignorant of what a misquote actually is, so what better way to provide an example where TH deliberately takes your own words and alters your intent entirely to show just what one is? Omitting a scripture reference isn't a misquote SD. It's simply an omission and in your case they're not relevant to the discussion at the best of times.
Geez SD, if omission counts as misquote then how many times have you snipped other peoples responses to you??!!
You've done it time and again when 'responding' to me! Yet have I accused you of misquoting me? No, that would only happen if you spun/altered my words into an altogether different meaning than intended. Clear now?
:doh:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
:yawn: Let the reader decide (Eph 4:14).
This one already has :yawn:
Addressed ad nauseam. Why you think this does your argument any favors grows yet more ridiculous.
Oh good.
lain: I didn't say you had, though frankly what you outright cut out and refuse to even attempt to address, along with transparent deflection about 'leftists' instead of answering on actual point is no better.
WizardofOz
New member
serpentdove - Can we get examples of when "the moderators cozy up to God-haters"?
Thanks
Thanks
oatmeal
Well-known member
It's your website, and I don't pay to be on it.
If you want to ban people for any reason,that is your choice.
The rules are rather subjective.
If I correct what I consider to be a non Christian pagan concept that others consider to be Christian, well, that is the risk I take.
However, even a football team in scrimmage, in practice has opposition.
oatmeal
If you want to ban people for any reason,that is your choice.
The rules are rather subjective.
If I correct what I consider to be a non Christian pagan concept that others consider to be Christian, well, that is the risk I take.
However, even a football team in scrimmage, in practice has opposition.
oatmeal
Some administrators seem too friendly with members who are antagonistic toward God's word (Hos 3:1, Ps 26:5, Jas 4:4). Do you mean name names of members that I personally would not call "friend"? I don't care to do that. I prefer to discuss issues.
each:
The Wiz asks:
serpentdove - Can we get examples of when "the moderators cozy up to God-haters"?
Thanks
Serpent replies:
Innuendo is so much more her style, after all.
serpentdove - Can we get examples of when "the moderators cozy up to God-haters"?
Thanks
Serpent replies:
Innuendo is so much more her style, after all.
Why are you looking for specifics? I prefer to keep a short memory for our purposes here. Every day is a new day (1 Cor 13:7). One never knows when a member will be saved (Jn 3:7). When that is the case, his worldview changes.
Understand the spirit of antichrist (1 Jn 4:2-6).
See:
The Jesus test, the gospel test, and the fruit test
I won't respond to each and every point you've made. :dizzy: If I think it's an important point, I'll address it. If I think the issue has been covered sufficiently, I won't. :mario: In general, people state their most important point first. Usually I respond to this.