The Trinity

[God's Truth]

Correct. Her thoughts are confused..

The Bible says that Jesus reveal's his Truth to those who obey him.

"The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will reveal myself to him."

 

[Bright Raven]

The Bible says that Jesus reveal's his Truth to those who obey him.

"The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will reveal myself to him."

He reveals his truth to those who love Him.

 

[God's Truth]

He reveals his truth to those who love Him.

Those who love Him are those who obey. We love Him by obeying Him.

John 14:21 The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me.

2 John 1:6 And this is love: that we walk in obedience to his commands.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Those who love Him are those who obey. We love Him by obeying Him.

Correction: we obey BECAUSE we love Him.

John 14:21 The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me.

2 John 1:6 And this is love: that we walk in obedience to his commands.

 

[God's Truth]

Correction: we obey BECAUSE we love Him.

John 14:21 The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me.

2 John 1:6 And this is love: that we walk in obedience to his commands.

Love IS obeying Him.

THAT IS WHAT GOD SAYS. Can you read?

2 John 1:6 And this is love: that we walk in obedience to his commands. As you have heard from the beginning, his command is that you walk in love.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Love IS obeying Him.

2 John 1:6 And this is love: that we walk in obedience to his commands. As you have heard from the beginning, his command is that you walk in love.

"Command" = Law

But what does the law tend to do? It puffs up, it makes people boast. Love does not boast.

 

[God's Truth]

"Command" = Law

But what does the law tend to do? It puffs up, it makes people boast. Love does not boast.

We have a new law. You are trying to shame people for obeying Jesus.

No such thing as being shameful that you obey.

Paul boasts in those who obey.

Angels rejoice.

Paul boasts in himself and that tells us we can boast in obeying.

The things no one can boast in anymore are the purification works.

That is circumcision and the like.

Romans 2:23 You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law?


The Jews had the ceremonial works to boast in, they boasted in those they circumcised too.


Galatians 6:13 Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh.

You took in the false teachings of those who tickled your ears.

You picked and choose the best sounding teacher that you liked.

That is not God's Truth.

That is not how we find God's Truth.

 

[JudgeRightly]

We have a new law. You are trying to shame people for obeying Jesus.

No such thing as being shameful that you obey.

Paul boasts in those who obey.

Angels rejoice.

Paul boasts in himself and that tells us we can boast in obeying.

The things no one can boast in anymore are the purification works.

That is circumcision and the like.

Romans 2:23 You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law?


The Jews had the ceremonial works to boast in, they boasted in those they circumcised too.


Galatians 6:13 Not even those who are circumcised keep the law, yet they want you to be circumcised that they may boast about your circumcision in the flesh.

You took in the false teachings of those who tickled your ears.

You picked and choose the best sounding teacher that you liked.

That is not God's Truth.

That is not how we find God's Truth.

GT, are you aware that there are doctrinal disputes in the Bible?

 

[God's Truth]

GT, are you aware that there are doctrinal disputes in the Bible?

There is NEVER, EVER, EVER a doctrinal dispute about obeying.

Who has so confused you?

 

[JudgeRightly]

There is NEVER, EVER, EVER a doctrinal dispute about obeying.

Who has so confused you?

I'm talking about doctrinal disputes in general.

Are you aware that they exist in the Bible?

 

[God's Truth]

I'm talking about doctrinal disputes in general.

Are you aware that they exist in the Bible?

What would you like to say?

Again, there is never a time when obeying is disputed.

Only people who misunderstand Paul thought we did not have to obey.

See 2 Peter 3:16 and 17. Read how Peter warns us to obey.

 

[JudgeRightly]

What would you like to say?

Again, there is never a time when obeying is disputed.

Only people who misunderstand Paul thought we did not have to obey.

See 2 Peter 3:16 and 17. Read how Peter warns us to obey.

Delete

 

[JudgeRightly]

What would you like to say?

Again, there is never a time when obeying is disputed.

Only people who misunderstand Paul thought we did not have to obey.

See 2 Peter 3:16 and 17. Read how Peter warns us to obey.

Are you aware that paul and the 12 Apostles had disputes on doctrine and what should be taught?

 

[JudgeRightly]

You are really twisting it now.

No, they did not.

They didn't? So Galatians 2 shouldn't be in the Bible? Specifically:

*Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; - Galatians 2:11 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians2:11&version=NKJV

"I withstood him to his face, for he was to be blamed". Pretty harsh, considering Peter is one of the twelve.

*Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. *And I went up by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. - Galatians 2:1-2 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians2:1-2&version=NKJV

Why the secrecy? Do you know?

You should listen to the Galatians Bible study by Pastor Enyart.

 

[God's Truth]

They didn't? So Galatians 2 shouldn't be in the Bible? Specifically:

*Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; - Galatians 2:11 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians2:11&version=NKJV

"I withstood him to his face, for he was to be blamed". Pretty harsh, considering Peter is one of the twelve.

*Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. *And I went up by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in vain. - Galatians 2:1-2 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians2:1-2&version=NKJV

Why the secrecy? Do you know?

You should listen to the Galatians Bible study by Pastor Enyart.

You are in serious trouble if you think Paul and Peter had doctrinal differences.

Peter acted out of LINE WITH THE TRUTH because he was AFRAID of the Jews.

That is not a doctrinal discrepancy.

 

[JudgeRightly]

You are in serious trouble if you think Paul and Peter had doctrinal differences.

Peter acted out of LINE WITH THE TRUTH because he was AFRAID of the Jews.

That is not a doctrinal discrepancy.

You don't know the Bible very well if you think there weren't any doctrinal disputes between Paul and the twelve.

 

[God's Truth]

You don't know the Bible very well if you don't think there weren't any doctrinal disputes between Paul and the twelve.

hahahahahahahaha There weren't any doctrinal discrepancies.

 

[JudgeRightly]

hahahahahahahaha Three weren't any doctrinal discrepancies.

So were the Christians who were saved under Paul's ministry supposed to circumsize?

 

[God's Truth]

So were the Christians who were saved under Paul's ministry supposed to circumsize?

Circumcision did not mean anything anymore.

Why do you think that Paul was prosecuted?

 

[JudgeRightly]

Circumcision did not mean anything anymore.

Why do you think that Paul was prosecuted?

It didn't mean anything? Tell that to the Jews.

Also, prosecution? That seems to me to be an indicator of doctrinal tension.