The Politically Incorrect Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.

[Arthur Brain]

(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person? Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).

Thank you for watching the video zoo. I must have missed where you defended King's plagiarism, communist ties and sexual degeneracy.

Regarding the source behind the video. It's already been established that I have used numerous sources to expose "The Politically Incorrect Truth About Martin Luther King Jr.", one of them being you and your beloved leader's Planned Parenthood (you've heard of them, they sell dead baby parts while munching on salad at lunch).

These "numerous sources" have a running theme throughout. They're done by neo nazi white supremacist crackpots, and considering that poxy thread on 'racism' you started yourself not so long back it's becoming more and more evident that you're just of the same ilk.

I mean, what sort of pea brained, gormless cretin would use such 'sources' to begin with? And not only that, expect them to fly?

Now if you want to be consistent, denounce the racist, anti Semitic/eugenic views of Margaret Sanger, and then you can come back and talk about King's plagiarism, communist ties (which was responsible for the death of 10's of thousands of American GIs) and his sexual deviancy, including that of being a homosexual.

I'll anxiously await your response (and please try to look me in the eye this time).

Dude, nobody takes you seriously, at least nobody sane at any rate...

 

[Arthur Brain]

I see that my stalker biggest fan has joined the thread.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4591351&postcount=445

If you would like for me to reopen WHMBR! Part 3 so that you can add your post about Ted Cruz to my "playbook", just ask.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3922003&postcount=3

(Did I mention that the detractors in this thread have taken my 4 part thread on homosexuality extremely hard?).

Oh boy...

Your homosexuality thread is as much of a joke as the gimp who started it.

Pompous blowhards...ya gotta laugh I suppose...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

...Dude, nobody takes you seriously, at least nobody sane at any rate...

 

[Arthur Brain]

Face it dude, you're just too straw brained for folk to take seriously. Anyone daft enough to use white supremacy sources as "evidence" is as whacked out as they are. Their type of mentality = thick. White supremacists are gormless and you've voiced admiration for what 'Creativity Movement' "stands for".

Schmuck...

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Sigh, more drama...

Face it dude, you're just too straw brained for folk to take seriously...
Schmuck...

You’ve heard of “Save the drama for your Mama,” but this is even better, because why throw all of that stuff into your poor Mama’s lap?

She done birthed you. She tired.

Llamas LIKE drama, that’s why they do all of that random spitting in people’s faces.

Apparently.

 

[WizardofOz]

(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person? Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).

:rotfl: You do this all the time, probably more than anyone on this site. You even make up silly pet names for people you 'debate'.

Other than a hypocrite, what does that make you? Why can't you 'look people in the eye' when you 'talk' to them on an Internet forum?

I'm sure that it's somehow different when you do it.

I see that my stalker biggest fan has joined the thread.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4591351&postcount=445

If you would like for me to reopen WHMBR! Part 3 so that you can add your post about Ted Cruz to my "playbook", just ask.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3922003&postcount=3

(Did I mention that the detractors in this thread have taken my 4 part thread on homosexuality extremely hard?).

Another post, another deflection. Do you wish to discuss Cruz's words on MLK Jr?

 

[Town Heretic]

I'll leave the thread open for another day in the event King's defenders want to try and defend what this very evil person had done.

If not, I'll close it again until this time next year.

Maybe those of us who've already been there and done that should just copy and paste the earlier posts you couldn't address. That's what I did on the ludicrous Sanger bit you trotted out again.

Just a thought for everyone.

(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person?

I can't speak for liberals, but my best guess would be because it's hard to credit you with being all here.

Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).

lain: On the internet.

 

[drbrumley]

Do you wish to discuss Cruz's words on MLK Jr?

:shocked: if he does

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person? Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).

You do this all the time, probably more than anyone on this site. You even make up silly pet names for people you 'debate'.

Other than a hypocrite, what does that make you? Why can't you 'look people in the eye' when you 'talk' to them on an Internet forum? I'm sure that it's somehow different when you do it.

(My my, Aaron is extra angry today. I hope that this passes and that he continues to be my very bestest friend in the whoooole wide world).

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I see that my stalker biggest fan has joined the thread.

If you would like for me to reopen WHMBR! Part 3 so that you can add your post about Ted Cruz to my "playbook", just ask.

(Did I mention that the detractors in this thread have taken my 4 part thread on homosexuality extremely hard?).

Another post, another deflection. Do you wish to discuss Cruz's words on MLK Jr?

No need to, as it will have no impact on the way Ted Cruz will legislate as President.

That being said: Since so many of your friends are very much concerned with me using a white supremacist source as a vehicle to show what was entered into the Congressional Record regarding King's plagiarism, communist ties and sexual degeneracy, perhaps they can counsel you and drbrumley as well when it comes to a certain Libertarian candidate that you've incessantly slobbered over.

Ron Paul posing with Don Black, the founder of neo-Nazi website StormFront and past Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan[1]. The person in the hat is Derek Black[2], Don’s son. The person who is standing behind the camera taking the picture is Jamie Kelso[3].
http://ronpaulsupporters.com/white-power-groups/

 

[Arthur Brain]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person? Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).



(My my, Aaron is extra angry today. I hope that this passes and that he continues to be my very bestest friend in the whoooole wide world).

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I see that my stalker biggest fan has joined the thread.

If you would like for me to reopen WHMBR! Part 3 so that you can add your post about Ted Cruz to my "playbook", just ask.

(Did I mention that the detractors in this thread have taken my 4 part thread on homosexuality extremely hard?).



No need to, as it will have no impact on the way Ted Cruz will legislate as President.

That being said: Since so many of your friends are very much concerned with me using a white supremacist source as a vehicle to show what was entered into the Congressional Record regarding King's plagiarism, communist ties and sexual degeneracy, perhaps they can counsel you and drbrumley as well when it comes to a certain Libertarian candidate that you've incessantly slobbered over.

Ron Paul posing with Don Black, the founder of neo-Nazi website StormFront and past Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan[1]. The person in the hat is Derek Black[2], Don’s son. The person who is standing behind the camera taking the picture is Jamie Kelso[3].
http://ronpaulsupporters.com/white-power-groups/

Just give it up already and admit you're a white supremacist yourself aCW. Your racism is splattered all over this thread and it's blatantly not just MLK you have an issue with. Let's revisit your brainless spew from another one of your 'gems'...:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=111114#top

Crank.

 

[WizardofOz]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
(Why do these liberals always refer to me in the 3rd person? Are they afraid to look a man in the eye when they're talking to him?).

(My my, Aaron is extra angry today. I hope that this passes and that he continues to be my very bestest friend in the whoooole wide world).

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I see that my stalker biggest fan has joined the thread.

If you would like for me to reopen WHMBR! Part 3 so that you can add your post about Ted Cruz to my "playbook", just ask.

(Did I mention that the detractors in this thread have taken my 4 part thread on homosexuality extremely hard?).

No need to, as it will have no impact on the way Ted Cruz will legislate as President.

That being said: Since so many of your friends are very much concerned with me using a white supremacist source as a vehicle to show what was entered into the Congressional Record regarding King's plagiarism, communist ties and sexual degeneracy, perhaps they can counsel you and drbrumley as well when it comes to a certain Libertarian candidate that you've incessantly slobbered over.

Ron Paul posing with Don Black, the founder of neo-Nazi website StormFront and past Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan[1]. The person in the hat is Derek Black[2], Don’s son. The person who is standing behind the camera taking the picture is Jamie Kelso[3].
http://ronpaulsupporters.com/white-power-groups/

Which is it this time? Is Ron Paul a racist? Are you a racist?

'But...but...it's different when I quote racist source material'

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarriorSince so many of your friends are very much concerned with me using a white supremacist source as a vehicle to show what was entered into the Congressional Record regarding King's plagiarism, communist ties and sexual degeneracy, perhaps they can counsel you and drbrumley as well when it comes to a certain Libertarian candidate that you've incessantly slobbered over.

Which is it this time? Is Ron Paul a racist? Are you a racist?

'But...but...it's different when I quote racist source material'

Since no one has even attempted to refute the information provided about King, his ties to Sanger (annabennedetti tried earlier in the thread as did TracerBullet recently), to communists and the fact that he was a sexual degenerate, instead of turning this thread into yet another one of Art Brain and WizardofOz's drama queen fests, tis time to close the "The Politically Incorrect Truth About Martin Luther King Jr." until next January.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

With Martin Luther King Jr. Day coming up soon, I thought that I'd do a quick review of what most Americans don't know about King.

First co-recipient of the Margaret Sanger/Planned Parenthood baby butcher award, violent sexual degenerate, communist sympathizer, plagiarist, fraudulent Christian, you name it, Mike King did it all.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan28.htm

 

[Crucible]

Did you hear about the mob of black people who took a white son and mother hostage in a house? They raped them, made them ingest chemicals to rid the evidence, and then murder them?

No?
That's because the media was too busy philosophizing about the morality of a criminal getting shot by an officer they assaulted.

I'm done hearing the same narrative spouted over and over. Blacks kill whites twice as much as whites kill blacks: black-on-white is 14.8%, compared to white-on-black which is 7.6%.

There is nothing racist about being sick and tired of being deemed something from a bunch of professional liars. MLK would roll over in his grave if he saw these people act they way they have- any integrity that was once there no longer is, and the black community can either stand up and change or fall to the crap the Left has possessed them with.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

MLK would roll over in his grave if he saw these people act they way they have- any integrity that was once there no longer is, and the black community can either stand up and change or fall to the crap the Left has possessed them with.

As I recall, you claimed in another thread that Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were republicans.
Up until the Donald Trump Presidency, pro homosexual, pro abortion, pro socialist, fake Christians never called themselves republican.

 

[Crucible]

As I recall, you claimed in another thread that Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were republicans.

They were both registered republicans, as were many black people. It's no secret, they all went democrat in the 70's and now it's almost taboo for a black person to be a republican.

I never thought too much about why and how that happened, I simply just call it a social phenomenon.
The Left has done them no favors.
Returning to your old slave masters in calling the Right racist is a bit odd

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
As I recall, you claimed in another thread that Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were republicans.
Up until the Donald Trump Presidency, pro homosexual, pro abortion, pro socialist, fake Christians never called themselves republican.

They were both registered republicans, as were many black people. It's no secret, they all went democrat in the 70's and now it's almost taboo for a black person to be a republican.

If it's "no secret", than you can supply documentation (MLK Sr. was a registered republican, not Jr.).

I never thought too much about why and how that happened, I simply just call it a social phenomenon.
The Left has done them no favors.
Returning to your old slave masters in calling the Right racist is a bit odd

Thoughts on MLK Jr. receiving the Margaret Sanger/Planned Parenthood award?

How about his close ties with communists, socialists and the openly homosexual Bayard Rustin?

https://amirhbahati.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/bayard-rustin-arrest.jpg

 

[Arthur Brain]

Better close the thread quick before this gets more embarrassing for you.

I think he kinda thrives on it...

lain:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by WizardofOz

Better close the thread quick before this gets more embarrassing for you.

I think he kinda thrives on it...

lain:

I started this years post off with talk about MLK Jr. and his homosexual lover ahem... associate Bayard Rustin just so that you and WizardofOz would feel at home.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I started this years post off with talk about MLK Jr. and his homosexual lover ahem... associate Bayard Rustin just so that you and WizardofOz would feel at home.

Yeah, I think you did that just to make yourself feel...*ahem*...'comfy' CCW...