Spammers wasteland
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
1. Comrade Marowbe's mission is to flood threads with a "monologue" of "leftist" bashing!
2. Comrade Marowbe is responsible for no less than 31,088 posts - that's equivalent to a full time job!
3. Comrade Marowbe refuses to even read the responses of those trying to engage - that would interfere with his primary mission!
4. Comrade Marowbe limits himself to short one or two line responses!
5. Comrade Marowbe deliberately sows the seeds of anger and distrust - undermining any attempts to reach agreement!
6. Comrade Marowbe's choice of words and phrases are stilted - as if they had been reinterpreted from another language!
7. Comrade Marowbe's choice of topics correspond to those being used by Russian "BOTS"
8. Comrade Marowbe meets all the criteria associated with Russian "BOTS" - whose purpose is to create social unrest in social media leading up to the 2018 Interims!
Last edited:
:angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob:
By now, we know these fake accounts helped influence the latest U.S. presidential election. Automated bot accounts made up 18 percent of Twitter’s traffic related to the 2016 election, according to researchers, and these bots overwhelmingly pushed messages in favor of now President Donald Trump. At least a third of pro-Trump tweets during the election came from bots, and half of Trump’s most engaged Twitter followers are bots.
By using Western ideals of free press and expression against themselves, as an example of how democracy is flawed, bots can sow widespread discord.
“That begins to degrade our ability to communicate with each other. It makes our discourse way more toxic, so we’re frequently more angry, more combative. That plays into Russian goals, which is to facilitate division within the United States,” Bergmann said
It’s also a national security risk. Trump’s White House has a track record of elevating fake news as fact, which has serious consequences for foreign relations and public policy-making. Repeating fake news from the highest seat of U.S. government helps create an alliance with Russia’s agenda.
:angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob:
In his March testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, former FBI agent and counter-terrorism expert Clinton Watts said Trump and his campaign aides have repeatedly “parroted” Russian propaganda. In turn, the state-linked accounts tend to post at “high volumes” when they know Trump is online so that their conspiracy theories will gain traction.
“[Trump] denies the intel from the United States about Russia. He claimed that the election could be rigged; that was the number one theme pushed by RT, Sputnik news,” Watts said. “Until we get a firm basis on fact and fiction in our own country, get some agreement about the facts… we’re going to have a big problem.”
And when a rumor broadcast as fact is repeated by the highest elected government officials, it causes division among the population — some of whom want to believe it and others who know it’s false.
“Even if Trump didn’t win, you were still going to have a guy who during the last two months of the election was all about the election being a rigged system, you would still have this guy who got just under half of the popular vote with a huge platform that would be effective at undercutting a Clinton presidency,” Bergmann said. “For the Russians, they won either way.”
:angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob::angrymob:
“All of us are the target for disinformation,” he said. “Look at the story, look at the statement. Is that person trying to comment on the evidence or are they insulting the witness? If they’re insulting the witness then that’s disinformation.”
https://thinkprogress.org/russian-bots-where-are-they-now-e2674c19017b/
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Is he gonna introduce laws that prohibit any type of "sexual misconduct" do you think?
:think:
:think:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Delete
Last edited:
Delete
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What, you mean like saying he's the greatest president of all time? Bonkers things like that? Hey, for America to be 'great' again would involve severe curtailment of 'sexual impropriety' wouldn't it? Getting laws in place that crack right down on adultery, cohabitation, gay relations, any sex outside marriage?
Delete
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What was uncivil about my inquiry? As Tambora has been very vocal in stating, there should seemingly be strict laws in place that prohibit any form of sexual relations outside of heterosexual marriage. So I asked you as to whether the current president would be likely to put laws in place that reflect that ideal and in turn, supposedly make America great again?
Delete
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Um, no, I'm simply asking you as to whether the president is likely to enact laws of the like that Tambora advocates where it comes to apparent 'sexual misconduct'.
Delete
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You'll do it anyway most likely although why you're shy of addressing the issue is rather telling. I'm presuming you agree with Tambora that any sexual relations outside of marriage should be criminal acts?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Hey, go run off to teacher if you can't handle or address issues GM. It's pretty much expected with you anyway.
Delete
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Not especially but it's kinda funny to see the discrepancies among those who do make it such a big issue...
Delete
Last edited:
Delete
Last edited:
Delete
Last edited:
- Status