Matt Barber Pedophiles Coming Out of the Closet
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
And the reason why this paedophile, with access to plenty of girls never touches even 1 of them is because...?....he's a paedophile. It's really not that difficult Jeff.
lain:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Perhaps this can help you.
http://dsadevil.blogspot.com/2006/10/homosexuality-versus-pedophilia.html
I told you so.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
some other dude
New member
Granite and artie, homo lovers and pedophile supporters.
You guys should be shot.
You guys should be shot.
From your link Arthur:
"Groth writes that the fixated offender, or pedophile, tends to select boys more often than girls, but for reasons having nothing to do with homosexuality:
In general, fixated child molesters are drawn to children sexually in that they identify with the child and appear in some ways to want to remain children themselves. It is for this reason that the trend for fixated offenders is to target boys as victims. . . . They see the boy as a projected representation of themselves. They feel themselves to be more child than adult – more boys than men – and therefore find themselves more comfortable (especially sexually) in the company of children. . . ."
Where have we heard that before?
"MARCH 15--Michael Jackson "doesn't really qualify as a pedophile. He's really just this regressed 10-year-old."
That was the surprising evaluation offered to police by Dr. Stanley Katz, the Los Angeles psychologist who interviewed the singer's teenage accuser and the boy's brother--and who is expected to soon testify as a government witness at Jackson's molestation trial.
In a taped June 2003 telephone interview, Katz, 55, gave a Santa Barbara sheriff's investigator his "off the record" opinion of the 46-year-old entertainer. Jackson, Katz told Det. Paul Zelis, "is a guy that's like a 10-year-old child. And, you know, he's doing what a 10-year-old would do with his little buddies. You know, they're gonna jack off, watch movies, drink wine, you know. And, you know, he doesn't even really qualify as a pedophile. He's really just this regressed 10-year-old."
That is a professional opinion not shared by Santa Barbara county detectives and prosecutors, who have spent 18 months building the case that Michael Joe Jackson preys on young boys.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/case-against-michael-jackson
So the question is Arthur, are 46 year old men that do nasty things to 10 year old boys really just repressed little boys, or is that a part of their widespread sexual perversion, homosexuality being part of it?
"When authorities raided Neverland in November 2003, it may not have been surprising that they seized a copy of Bruce Weber’s The Chop Suey Club, a book of art photography of blond, hunky men. But they also found Couples and Club magazines, several Barely Legal DVDs, a documentary called Pimps Up, Ho’s Down, and a book called Poo-Chi, containing highly styled photos of armpits and knees posed to resemble female genitalia. Some wondered whether maybe, underneath the falsetto and arched eyebrows, Jackson was just another porn-perusing straight guy.
In court, his accuser stated that Jackson showed him Internet porn and a copy of Barely Legal. According to Dr. William Granzig, dean of clinical sexology at Maimonides University in Florida, straight porn is a common part of the pedophile arsenal. “If he showed the boys something graphically homosexual, they would be upset,” says Granzig. “If he shows them something straight, it’s a way of bringing up the subject of sex. ‘Looking at (a naked woman) is okay, so looking at my penis is okay.’”
"There is a grooming process they use to get boys to go along with it.”
http://nymag.com/nymetro/nightlife/sex/columns/mating/11610/
some other dude
New member
Rusha seems to be confused about my last post.
(Rusha seems to be confused about a lot of things, actually :chuckle: )
To explain:
Promoting societal acceptance of homosexuality, as Granite and artie are doing, emboldens pedophiles to push their cause, equal rights for "minor-attracted adults".
Accepting the homosexual agenda inevitably leads to the pedophile agenda. In that sense, Granite and artie, by eagerly accepting homosexuals, are opening the door for pedophiles.
For that, they should indeed be shot, or at least horsewhipped and publicly disgraced, their posessions seized, their lands salted, their children ostracized.
Shooting them seems easier.
(Rusha seems to be confused about a lot of things, actually :chuckle: )
To explain:
Promoting societal acceptance of homosexuality, as Granite and artie are doing, emboldens pedophiles to push their cause, equal rights for "minor-attracted adults".
Accepting the homosexual agenda inevitably leads to the pedophile agenda. In that sense, Granite and artie, by eagerly accepting homosexuals, are opening the door for pedophiles.
For that, they should indeed be shot, or at least horsewhipped and publicly disgraced, their posessions seized, their lands salted, their children ostracized.
Shooting them seems easier.
Originally Posted by Granite
I told you so.
Not that either of you care, but the link Arthur provided was written by a Log Cabin Republican.
I told you so.
Not that either of you care, but the link Arthur provided was written by a Log Cabin Republican.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
ASC, I've little interest in getting into the subject of sexuality of any sort after previous fruitless exchanges. Your fixation with homosexuality is not exactly anything new as are the cut n pastes...
lain:
some other dude
New member
In other words, tardlyartie's tiny little liberal pea-brain can't explain why it calls an eighteen year old male in a sexual relationship with a fifteen year old male a pedophile instead of a homosexual.
ASC, I've little interest in getting into the subject of sexuality of any sort after previous fruitless exchanges. Your fixation with homosexuality is not exactly anything new as are the cut n pastes...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VrFV5r8cs0
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Usually I couldn't care less what you think.
So, question: does anyone else here think pornography made Bundy a killer? Or should we actually blame him for the decisions and choices he made?
Nope. Sociopaths don't become that way because they've read Penthouse. Blaming his actions on 'skin flicks' is just pathetic....