another "95 million year old" non de-evolved fossil found

Status
Not open for further replies.

Toast

New member
I thought this post was appropriate considering that this goes hand in hand with Bob's post about the shark fossil.

Here is the link and some interesting key excerpts. Enjoy!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090318/sc_livescience/rarefossiloctopusesfound

"What most surprised Fuchs and his colleagues Giacomo Bracchi and Robert Weis was how similar the specimens are to modern octopus. "These things are 95 million years old, yet one of the fossils is almost indistinguishable from living species," Fuchs said."

"It's hard enough to find fossils of hard things like dinosaur bones. Now scientists have found evidence of 95 million-year-old octopuses, among the rarest and unlikeliest of fossils, complete with ink and suckers.

The body of an octopus is composed almost entirely of muscle and skin. When an octopus dies, it quickly decays and liquefies into a slimy blob. After just a few days there will be nothing left at all. And that assumes that the fresh carcass is not consumed almost immediately by scavengers.

The result is that preservation of an octopus as a fossil is about as unlikely as finding a fossil sneeze, and none of the 200 to 300 species of octopus known today had ever been found in fossilized form, said Dirk Fuchs of the Freie University Berlin, lead author of the report."

" Both the anoxy [absence of oxygen] and a rapid sedimentation rate prevented decay."
 

Jukia

New member
It might be helpful if someone could post a link to the actual paper rather than a Yahoo article.

And, so what? Oh yeah, per Pastor Bob it would appear that scientists should never be surprised.

Next question, how old do you think this fossil is? And why? Science please, no reference to Genesis.
 

Southgarden

BANNED
Banned
So what? If the environment is stable and the creature well enough adapted, you won't see much change. It kinda seems like you think that the ultimate goal of evolution is to make every living thing as similar to yourself as possible.
 

Nick M

Black Rifles Matter
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
So what? If the environment is stable and the creature well enough adapted, you won't see much change. It kinda seems like you think that the ultimate goal of evolution is to make every living thing as similar to yourself as possible.

Then why do mice, ants, and people often live in the same place? :king:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top